Claim · model-written summary
Pruning induced 33% grapevine budbreak after eight days.
VitisNot reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingDirectionQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“budbreak rates induced by pruning (P), hydrogen cyanamide (HC), pruning plus hydrogen cyanamide (PHC) and water (control) after 8 days were 33, 53, 95, and 0 %, respectively”
e1“buds of grapevine”
Title
Boonyawat Sudawan; Chih-Sheng Chang; Hsiu-fung Chao; et al. BMC Plant Biology 2016. doi:10.1186/s12870-016-0889-y
Other claims from this paper (11)
- Intervention effect Hydrogen cyanamide induced 53% budbreak after eight days.
- Intervention effect Combined pruning and hydrogen cyanamide induced 95% budbreak after eight days.
- Observation Water control showed zero budbreak after eight days.
- Intervention effect Combined treatment accumulated high ROS and nitric oxide in buds after 12 hours versus either treatment alone.
- Association ROS and NO accumulation correlated strongly with budbreak rates.
- Intervention effect Combined treatment altered the largest number of genes relative to control.
- Intervention effect Pruning affected the fewest genes.
- Intervention effect Combined treatment produced greater transcriptional activation of the genes.
- Observation Twelve ROS-related genes showed transient expression during 48 hours of combined treatment.
- Mechanism ROS-related gene-expression changes were proposed as a major factor in budbreak.
- Mechanism Early sublethal ROS/RNS accumulation was proposed to induce cell-wall loosening and expansion for sprouting.