Paper · 2024 · Indian Journal of Arid Horticulture

Performance of parthenocarpic cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) under polyhouse condition as influenced by organic amendments

Piyusha Sharma; K D Ameta; R B Dubey; et al.

4
claims
7
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The study revealed that various treatment combinations of biodynamic, silica and Dashparni imparted significant effects on growth, yield and quality parameters of cucumber grown under protected cultivation. Out of various treatments and treatment combinations, treatment T10 (BD 500 @75g/ha + BD 501 @2.5g/ha+ Silica @1% + Dashparni @10%) was found superior for most of parameters studied i.e. vine length at 30 DAS (m), 60 DAS (m), final harvest (m), leaf area (cm²), days to first anthesis, days to first harvest, fruit weight (g), fruit volume (cc), fruit length (cm), fruit diameter (cm), number of branches, yield per vine (kg), yield per square meter (kg),and yield per acre (t),whereas least performing treatment was T1 (control).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The amendment combinations significantly affected cucumber growth, yield and quality.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
biodynamic, silica and Dashparnie0
Outcome
growth, yield and quality parameterse0
Setting
protected cultivatione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“various treatment combinations of biodynamic, silica and Dashparni imparted significant effects on growth, yield and quality parameters of cucumber grown under protected cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 24–205 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T10 was superior for cucumber vine length, leaf area, branch number and flowering and harvest timing, whereas T1 performed least.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
T10 (BD 500 @75g/ha + BD 501 @2.5g/ha+ Silica @1% + Dashparni @10%)e0
Outcome
vine length at 30 DAS (m), 60 DAS (m), final harvest (m)e0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
T1 (control)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment T10 (BD 500 @75g/ha + BD 501 @2.5g/ha+ Silica @1% + Dashparni @10%) was found superior for most of parameters studied i.e. vine length at 30 DAS (m), 60 DAS (m), final harvest (m), leaf area (cm²), days to first anthesis, days to first harvest, fruit weight (g), fruit volume (cc), fruit length (cm), fruit diameter (cm), number of branches, yield per vine (kg), yield per square meter (kg),and yield per acre (t),whereas least performing treatment was T1 (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–736 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T10 was superior for cucumber fruit weight, volume, length and diameter versus T1.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
T10 (BD 500 @75g/ha + BD 501 @2.5g/ha+ Silica @1% + Dashparni @10%)e0
Outcome
fruit weight (g), fruit volume (cc), fruit length (cm)e0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
T1 (control)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment T10 (BD 500 @75g/ha + BD 501 @2.5g/ha+ Silica @1% + Dashparni @10%) was found superior for most of parameters studied i.e. vine length at 30 DAS (m), 60 DAS (m), final harvest (m), leaf area (cm²), days to first anthesis, days to first harvest, fruit weight (g), fruit volume (cc), fruit length (cm), fruit diameter (cm), number of branches, yield per vine (kg), yield per square meter (kg),and yield per acre (t),whereas least performing treatment was T1 (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–736 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T10 was superior for cucumber yield per vine, square meter and acre versus T1.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
T10 (BD 500 @75g/ha + BD 501 @2.5g/ha+ Silica @1% + Dashparni @10%)e0
Outcome
yield per vine (kg), yield per square meter (kg),and yield per acre (t)e0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
T1 (control)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment T10 (BD 500 @75g/ha + BD 501 @2.5g/ha+ Silica @1% + Dashparni @10%) was found superior for most of parameters studied i.e. vine length at 30 DAS (m), 60 DAS (m), final harvest (m), leaf area (cm²), days to first anthesis, days to first harvest, fruit weight (g), fruit volume (cc), fruit length (cm), fruit diameter (cm), number of branches, yield per vine (kg), yield per square meter (kg),and yield per acre (t),whereas least performing treatment was T1 (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–736 · show in text ↑
t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–38 · show in text ↑

silicon dioxide · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results differ

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.