silicon dioxide · Yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)
9 claims from these papers.
Papers whose results differ, checked claim by claim 1
1 pair of papers on this question report results that differ: an effect in one paper, the opposite effect or no effect in the other. Two model reviewers reading both claims accepted each pair.
- SILICIO COMO BIOESTIMULANTE EN EL CULTIVO DE PEPINO (Cucumis sativus L.) (2024)
increase0.27 g SiO2 per plant increased cucumber yield per hectare in a greenhouse.
Nanoparticle-Elicited Eustress Intensifies Cucumber Plant Adaptation to Water Deficit (2025)no changeSilica seed priming did not reduce cucumber yield.
What separates themSituation: not stated · seed primingCompare the two papers →
How these papers cite each other
None of these papers cites another one here.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 5
- positive
Effects of bio-stimulants on the yield of cucumber fruits and on nutrient content · 2019
- positive
Assessment of Two Calcium Silicate Sources on Cucumber Under Water Restriction · 2023
- positive
SILICIO COMO BIOESTIMULANTE EN EL CULTIVO DE PEPINO (Cucumis sativus L.) · 2024
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 1
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.