Paper · 2017 · International Journal of Agricultural Research

Role of Silicon Dioxide Nano Fertilizer in Mitigating Salt Stress on Growth, Yield and Chemical Composition of Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)

Abdelazim Yassen; Emam Abdallah; Maybelle Gaballah; et al.

5
claims
12
verbatim quotes
130
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Background and Objective: Salinity either saline water of irrigation or saline soil is considered a major factor in limiting plant growth. Nano fertilizers are used to reduce drastic effect of salinity. This study was performed to limit salinity drastic effect on plant productivity and to study the effect of SiO 2 nano fertilizers foliar spray on growth parameter, yield, chemical composition of cucumber (Cucumis sativa) grown under agricultural drainage water. Materials and Methods: A field experiment was carried out in Kasr Rashwan village at Tameya province, Fayoum Governorate, Egypt during season (2015) to study the effect of SiO 2 nano fertilizers foliar spray at a rates of (0, 15, 30, 60 and 120 mg LG 1 ) on growth parameters, yield and chemical composition of cucumber (Cucumis sativa) under (agricultural drainage water). All data were subjected to an analysis of variance (One-way ANOVA) for a split-plot design, after testing for the homogeneity of error variances. Statistically significant differences between means were compared at p<0.05. Results: The outcome data revealed an increase in plant height (cm), number of leaves/plant, fresh and dry weights of leaves/plant (g), number of fruits/plant, mean weight of fruit, fruit length and yield kg/plant total yield t haG 1 as compared with the untreated plants under agricultural drainage water. Data also, demonstrated that application a foliar spray of SiO 2 nanoparticle at rate of 60 mg LG 1 gave a significant increase LSD<0.05 for most of growth parameter as compared to other treatments (15, 30 and 120 mg LG 1 ). Conclusion: Accordingly, results indicated increase in nitrogen and phosphorus, content and uptake and decrease in Na content and uptake when adding SiO 2 nano fertilizer. This study has identified that Silicon dioxide nano fertilizer can have a positive effect on the growth of plant and yield of cucumber.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon dioxide nanofertilizer increased cucumber plant height, leaf number, and fresh and dry leaf weights relative to untreated plants.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse2
Treatment
SiO 2 nano fertilizers foliar spraye0
Outcome
plant height (cm), number of leaves/plant, fresh and dry weights of leaves/plant (g)e1
Direction
increasee1
Comparator
untreated plantse1
Setting
agricultural drainage watere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SiO 2 nano fertilizers foliar spray at a rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–683 · show in text ↑
e1

“an increase in plant height (cm), number of leaves/plant, fresh and dry weights of leaves/plant (g), number of fruits/plant, mean weight of fruit, fruit length and yield kg/plant total yield t haG 1 as compared with the untreated plants under agricultural drainage water.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1368 · show in text ↑
e2

“growth parameter, yield, chemical composition of cucumber (Cucumis sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–423 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon dioxide nanofertilizer increased cucumber fruit number, weight, length and yield relative to untreated plants.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse2
Treatment
SiO 2 nano fertilizers foliar spraye0
Outcome
number of fruits/plant, mean weight of fruit, fruit length and yield kg/plant total yield t haG 1e1
Direction
increasee1
Comparator
untreated plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SiO 2 nano fertilizers foliar spray at a rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–683 · show in text ↑
e1

“an increase in plant height (cm), number of leaves/plant, fresh and dry weights of leaves/plant (g), number of fruits/plant, mean weight of fruit, fruit length and yield kg/plant total yield t haG 1 as compared with the untreated plants under agricultural drainage water.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1368 · show in text ↑
e2

“growth parameter, yield, chemical composition of cucumber (Cucumis sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–423 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A 60 mg LG 1 foliar spray significantly increased most growth parameters relative to the other stated rates.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
a foliar spray of SiO 2 nanoparticle at rate of 60 mg LG 1e0
Outcome
most of growth parametere0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
other treatments (15, 30 and 120 mg LG 1 )e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application a foliar spray of SiO 2 nanoparticle at rate of 60 mg LG 1 gave a significant increase LSD<0.05 for most of growth parameter as compared to other treatments (15, 30 and 120 mg LG 1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1398–1592 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth parameter, yield, chemical composition of cucumber (Cucumis sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–423 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon dioxide nanofertilizer increased cucumber nitrogen and phosphorus content and uptake.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
SiO 2 nano fertilizere0
Outcome
nitrogen and phosphorus, content and uptakee0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increase in nitrogen and phosphorus, content and uptake and decrease in Na content and uptake when adding SiO 2 nano fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1637–1764 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth parameter, yield, chemical composition of cucumber (Cucumis sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–423 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicon dioxide nanofertilizer decreased cucumber sodium content and uptake.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
SiO 2 nano fertilizere0
Outcome
Na content and uptakee0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decrease in Na content and uptake when adding SiO 2 nano fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1697–1764 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth parameter, yield, chemical composition of cucumber (Cucumis sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–423 · show in text ↑

silicon dioxide · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results differ

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

silicon dioxide · nutrient: content · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

silicon dioxide · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

nanoparticle · nutrient: content · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 14 positive, 2 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 24 positive, 2 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

application · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

73 papers: 66 positive, 7 negative or no effect

65 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

application · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

73 papers: 65 positive, 8 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

94 papers: 78 positive, 16 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

90 papers more in this group

See all 94 papers →

8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.