Paper · 2025 · Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science

Enhancing Japonica Rice Yield Under Elevated CO2: Addressing Limitations and Strategies

Weilu Wang; Xiaowu Yan; Yu Wei; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Elevated CO 2 enhances photosynthesis and yield in rice, with indica rice generally displaying a stronger yield response than japonica . However, uncertainty remains about the key yield components driving this difference, which limits breeding strategies for enhancing japonica rice yield. To identify critical factors in yield responses to elevated CO 2 and to explore potential improvements in japonica rice yield, we conducted a meta‐analysis of FACE (Free‐Air Carbon dioxide Enrichment) data from China and Japan to examine yield component contributions. Additionally, we investigated whether rice lines with enlarged root systems could enhance yield response to elevated CO 2 (+200 μmol mol −1 ). Our results indicated that, under elevated CO 2 , Chinese indica rice genotypes achieved a substantial grain yield increase, averaging around 31.1%. On the other hand, the Chinese and Japanese japonica along with the Japanese indica demonstrated more moderate increases, measuring about 10.3%, 13.7% and 12.5%, respectively. Among yield components, spikelets per panicle (SPP), often a lagging indicator, was identified as a crucial factor in further increasing yield potential. OsERF3 ‐overexpressing rice lines not only expanded root growth but also stimulated root vigour under elevated CO 2 conditions. These enlarged‐root lines demonstrated improved nutrient uptake, nitrogen‐content stability, increased photosynthesis rates and greater grain weight, effectively avoiding the SPP reductions typically seen in Chinese japonica under elevated CO 2 . As a result, these lines achieved a 38.6% yield increase under elevated CO 2 , outperforming wild‐type japonica responses. These findings suggest that enlarged‐root rice lines could be a promising breeding platform for enhancing rice production and developing climate‐resilient rice cultivars.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chinese indica grain yield rose around 31.1% under elevated carbon dioxide.

Material
Chinese indica rice genotypese0
Treatment
elevated CO 2e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
31.1%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under elevated CO 2 , Chinese indica rice genotypes achieved a substantial grain yield increase, averaging around 31.1%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–858 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chinese japonica yield increased about 10.3% under elevated carbon dioxide.

Material
Chinese and Japanese japonicae0
Treatment
elevated CO 2e1
Outcome
increasese0
Direction
increasese0
Value
10.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Chinese and Japanese japonica along with the Japanese indica demonstrated more moderate increases, measuring about 10.3%, 13.7% and 12.5%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–1034 · show in text ↑
e1

“under elevated CO 2 , Chinese indica rice genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–790 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Japanese japonica yield increased about 13.7% under elevated carbon dioxide.

Material
Japanese japonicae0
Treatment
elevated CO 2e1
Outcome
increasese0
Direction
increasese0
Value
13.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Chinese and Japanese japonica along with the Japanese indica demonstrated more moderate increases, measuring about 10.3%, 13.7% and 12.5%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–1034 · show in text ↑
e1

“under elevated CO 2 , Chinese indica rice genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–790 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Japanese indica yield increased about 12.5% under elevated carbon dioxide.

Material
Japanese indicae0
Treatment
elevated CO 2e1
Outcome
increasese0
Direction
increasese0
Value
12.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Chinese and Japanese japonica along with the Japanese indica demonstrated more moderate increases, measuring about 10.3%, 13.7% and 12.5%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–1034 · show in text ↑
e1

“under elevated CO 2 , Chinese indica rice genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–790 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–23 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spikelets per panicle was identified as crucial to further yield gains.

Organ / stage
spikelets per panicle (SPP)e0
Outcome
yield potentiale0
Direction
increasinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spikelets per panicle (SPP), often a lagging indicator, was identified as a crucial factor in further increasing yield potential”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1188 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

OsERF3 overexpressing lines expanded root growth and vigour under elevated carbon dioxide.

Material
OsERF3 ‐overexpressing rice linese0
Treatment
elevated CO 2e0
Gene
OsERF3e0
Outcome
root growthe0
Direction
expandede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“OsERF3 ‐overexpressing rice lines not only expanded root growth but also stimulated root vigour under elevated CO 2 conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1316 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enlarged-root lines improved nutrient uptake, nitrogen stability and photosynthesis.

Material
enlarged‐root linese0
Outcome
nutrient uptake, nitrogen‐content stability, increased photosynthesis ratese0
Direction
improvede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These enlarged‐root lines demonstrated improved nutrient uptake, nitrogen‐content stability, increased photosynthesis rates and greater grain weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1318–1466 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–23 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enlarged-root lines had greater grain weight.

Material
enlarged‐root linese0
Outcome
grain weighte0
Direction
greatere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These enlarged‐root lines demonstrated improved nutrient uptake, nitrogen‐content stability, increased photosynthesis rates and greater grain weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1318–1466 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–23 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enlarged-root lines avoided spikelet-per-panicle reductions typical of Chinese japonica under elevated carbon dioxide.

Material
Chinese japonicae0
Outcome
SPP reductionse0
Direction
avoidinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effectively avoiding the SPP reductions typically seen in Chinese japonica under elevated CO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1468–1562 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enlarged-root lines achieved a 38.6% yield increase under elevated carbon dioxide, exceeding wild-type japonica.

Material
these linese0
Treatment
elevated CO 2e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
38.6%e0
Comparator
wild‐type japonicae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these lines achieved a 38.6% yield increase under elevated CO 2 , outperforming wild‐type japonica responses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1578–1686 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–23 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors suggest enlarged-root lines as a breeding platform for rice production.

Material
enlarged‐root rice linese0
Outcome
promising breeding platforme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“enlarged‐root rice lines could be a promising breeding platform for enhancing rice production and developing climate‐resilient rice cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1716–1857 · show in text ↑

co2 · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

159 papers: 131 positive, 28 negative or no effect

130 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

155 papers more in this group

See all 159 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.