Paper · 2025 · Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca

Evaluating salt tolerance of chickpea genotypes based on morpho-physiological and biochemical parameters

Mawia SOBH; Tahoora B. ZARGAR; Oqba BASAL; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Screening for salinity stress is complicated due to variations in response and sensitivity at different developmental stages of the chickpea crop life cycle. Evaluation of the performance of chickpea in response to NaCl-induced salinity stress at the initial vegetative phase is a quick and cost-effective method for assessing tolerance and survival compared to traditional field approaches. An experiment was carried out under hydroponic conditions to evaluate the performance of two chickpea genotypes (‘Elmo’ and ‘Orion’), under different salinity stress levels (25, 50 and 75 mM NaCl). Increased levels of NaCl in the growing medium caused a significant decrease in leaf relative water content, where the percentage of reduction at the highest salt level was approximately 16.9% compared to the control. ‘Orion’ was able to produce and accumulate a higher amount of proline (3.45 µmol g dwt.-1), compared to the ‘Elmo’ (2.95 µmol g dwt.-1), which enabled plants to absorb a greater quantity of water and maintain a higher relative water content in the ‘Orion’ (88%) compared to ‘Elmo’ (84.1%), and accordingly the percentage of solutes leakage and MDA content were significantly higher in ‘Elmo’ (72.2% and 49.7 µmol g dwt.-1, respectively) compared to ‘Orion’ (60.3% and 29.5 µmol g dwt. -1, respectively). The results indicate the importance of the osmotic adjustment mechanism in maintaining protoplast hydration and membrane stability under salinity stress. Based on the investigated parameters, genotypic differences were found in the response to salt treatments. ‘Orion’ genotype was found to be more salt-tolerant compared to ‘Elmo’ one.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher NaCl significantly reduced chickpea leaf relative water content by approximately 16.9% at the highest dose.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Increased levels of NaCle0
Outcome
leaf relative water contente0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
approximately 16.9%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increased levels of NaCl in the growing medium caused a significant decrease in leaf relative water content, where the percentage of reduction at the highest salt level was approximately 16.9% compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–807 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Orion accumulated more proline than Elmo, 3.45 versus 2.95 µmol g dwt.-1.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
‘Orion’e0
Outcome
prolinee0
Direction
highere0
Value
3.45 µmol g dwt.-1e0
Qualifier
2.95 µmol g dwt.-1e0
Comparator
‘Elmo’e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘Orion’ was able to produce and accumulate a higher amount of proline (3.45 µmol g dwt.-1), compared to the ‘Elmo’ (2.95 µmol g dwt.-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–943 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Orion had higher relative water content than Elmo, 88% versus 84.1%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
‘Orion’e0
Outcome
relative water contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
88%e0
Qualifier
84.1%e0
Comparator
‘Elmo’e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher relative water content in the ‘Orion’ (88%) compared to ‘Elmo’ (84.1%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1096 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Elmo had higher solute leakage than Orion, 72.2% versus 60.3%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
‘Elmo’e0
Outcome
solutes leakagee0
Direction
highere0
Value
72.2%e0
Qualifier
60.3%e0
Comparator
‘Orion’e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the percentage of solutes leakage and MDA content were significantly higher in ‘Elmo’ (72.2% and 49.7 µmol g dwt.-1, respectively) compared to ‘Orion’ (60.3% and 29.5 µmol g dwt. -1, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1310 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Elmo had higher MDA content than Orion, 49.7 versus 29.5 µmol g dwt.-1.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
‘Elmo’e0
Outcome
MDA contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
49.7 µmol g dwt.-1e0
Qualifier
29.5 µmol g dwt. -1e0
Comparator
‘Orion’e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the percentage of solutes leakage and MDA content were significantly higher in ‘Elmo’ (72.2% and 49.7 µmol g dwt.-1, respectively) compared to ‘Orion’ (60.3% and 29.5 µmol g dwt. -1, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1310 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–37 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Osmotic adjustment was implicated in protoplast hydration and membrane stability under salinity.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
protoplast hydration and membrane stabilitye0
Qualifier
osmotic adjustment mechanisme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results indicate the importance of the osmotic adjustment mechanism in maintaining protoplast hydration and membrane stability under salinity stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1312–1465 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypes differed in their response to salt treatments.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
genotypic differencese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“genotypic differences were found in the response to salt treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1504–1572 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–37 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Orion was more salt tolerant than Elmo.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
‘Orion’e0
Outcome
salt-tolerante0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
‘Elmo’e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘Orion’ genotype was found to be more salt-tolerant compared to ‘Elmo’ one.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1573–1648 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–37 · show in text ↑