Paper · 2025 · Journal of soil science and plant nutrition

Application of Thiourea Alleviates Adverse Effects of Heavy Metals Stress in Wheat

Reza Ahmadi; Farid Shekari; Afshin Tavakoli; et al.

12
claims
25
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract This research examined the role of thiourea (TU) in alleviating the adverse effects of heavy metal stress on the growth and physiological traits of wheat, cv. Azar 2 under greenhouse conditions. The pots were contaminated with metal plant smelting waste. Thiourea was also applied by two methods: seed priming and foliar spraying. Thiourea treatments were applied at seven levels, which included no application of TU, seed priming at concentrations of 500, 1000, and 1500 mg L −1 , and foliar spraying at tillering stage at the same concentrations. Soil contamination with heavy metals has detrimental effects on plant functions. Under contamination conditions, the first day of seedling emergence was delayed (157%), and emergence percent (42.4%), survived seedling (24.4%), seedling’s leaf area (53.6%) and number (43.8%) and its dry weight (36.2%) decreased significantly compared to non-contaminated soil. In contrast, seed priming with TU, especially at concentrations of 1000 and 1500 mg L −1 , increased seedling function and performance. Heavy metal stress also caused damage to the plant at the pre-stem elongation stage. Under stress conditions, total soluble sugars (28.6%), proline content (174.7%), electrolyte leakage(169.6%), leaf temperature (205.9%), root density (53.1%), lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), and zinc (Zn) (229.5%) concentration were increased; while the relative water content (23.9%), leaf area (47.1%), plant tissues dry weight, root volume (14.3%), photosynthetic pigments and chlorophyll stability index (52.0%), nitrogen (N) (37.9%), phosphorus (P) (53.0%) and potassium (K) (56.4%) content decreased. Similar to seedling stage, the higher concentrations of TU had more effects on plant functions than 500 mg L −1 . In most of the measured traits, foliar spraying showed better effects than to priming method. Surprisingly, root dry weight and volume had higher values with 500 mg L −1 treatment compared to higher concentrations of TU. Also, seed priming was more effective than foliar spraying for these two traits. It seems that treatments that caused more aerial development had fewer effects on the development of the underground part. Therefore, different concentrations of TU changed the photoassimilates allocation. The application of TU enhanced mineral nutrition both under stressed and non-stressed conditions, while decreasing heavy metal content in treated plants. This effect was noticeable for Zn content. The Zn content was increased by TU application with both methods under non-stress conditions, while decreased under stress conditions compared to non- application of TU treatment. Overall, thiourea (TU) enhanced wheat resistance to stress by regulating nutrient uptake and improving physiological characteristics. Our data showed that the higher concentrations of TU, especially 1000 mg L −1 and by foliar spraying method, are more effective than other concentrations and seed priming method. In addition, the results show that thiourea is a compound that, at different concentrations, has multiple effects on plant physiological performance and allometric relationships. These effects can be observed by changing the partitioning of photoassimilates into root and aerial parts, regulating the accumulation of essential elements and heavy metals in leaves, and changing the density and volume of roots. Ultimately, this research concluded that the application of TU as a growth regulator can be an effective strategy for improving wheat's resistance to heavy metal stress and increasing crop quality in contaminated soils. These findings will help farmers and researchers find better ways to address the challenges posed by heavy metal contamination in wheat and other field crops.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Metal contamination delayed wheat seedling emergence by 157%.

Treatment
contamination conditionse0
Outcome
first day of seedling emergencee0
Direction
delayede0
Value
157%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under contamination conditions, the first day of seedling emergence was delayed (157%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–725 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Metal contamination significantly reduced wheat emergence, survival, leaf traits and dry weight.

Treatment
contaminatione1
Outcome
emergence percente0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
42.4%e0
Comparator
non-contaminated soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“emergence percent (42.4%), survived seedling (24.4%), seedling’s leaf area (53.6%) and number (43.8%) and its dry weight (36.2%) decreased significantly compared to non-contaminated soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–917 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–82 · show in text ↑
e1

“Under contamination conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–669 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiourea seed priming at 1000 and 1500 mg L −1 improved wheat seedling performance.

Treatment
seed priming with TU, especially at concentrations of 1000 and 1500 mg L −1e0
Outcome
seedling function and performancee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed priming with TU, especially at concentrations of 1000 and 1500 mg L −1 , increased seedling function and performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–1053 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under heavy metal stress, wheat soluble sugars, proline, electrolyte leakage, leaf temperature and root density increased.

Treatment
stress conditionse0
Outcome
total soluble sugarse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
28.6%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under stress conditions, total soluble sugars (28.6%), proline content (174.7%), electrolyte leakage(169.6%), leaf temperature (205.9%), root density (53.1%), lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd), and zinc (Zn) (229.5%) concentration were increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1375 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under stress, wheat relative water content, leaf area, dry weight, root volume, pigments and nutrient contents declined.

Outcome
relative water contente0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
23.9%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while the relative water content (23.9%), leaf area (47.1%), plant tissues dry weight, root volume (14.3%), photosynthetic pigments and chlorophyll stability index (52.0%), nitrogen (N) (37.9%), phosphorus (P) (53.0%) and potassium (K) (56.4%) content decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1638 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar thiourea generally benefited wheat traits more than seed priming.

Treatment
foliar sprayinge0
Outcome
measured traitse0
Direction
better effectse0
Comparator
priming methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In most of the measured traits, foliar spraying showed better effects than to priming method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1754–1846 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat root dry weight and volume were higher with 500 mg L −1 thiourea than at higher doses.

Treatment
500 mg L −1 treatmente0
Outcome
root dry weight and volumee0
Direction
higher valuese0
Comparator
higher concentrations of TUe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root dry weight and volume had higher values with 500 mg L −1 treatment compared to higher concentrations of TU”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1862–1973 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed priming outperformed foliar spraying for wheat root dry weight and volume.

Treatment
seed priminge0
Outcome
these two traitse0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
foliar sprayinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Also, seed priming was more effective than foliar spraying for these two traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1975–2054 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiourea improved wheat mineral nutrition under both stress conditions.

Treatment
TUe0
Outcome
mineral nutritione0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
both under stressed and non-stressed conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of TU enhanced mineral nutrition both under stressed and non-stressed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2262–2358 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiourea lowered heavy metal content in treated wheat.

Treatment
TUe1
Outcome
heavy metal contente0
Direction
decreasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while decreasing heavy metal content in treated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2360–2414 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–82 · show in text ↑
e1

“The application of TU enhanced mineral nutrition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2262–2310 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiourea raised wheat zinc content without metal stress and reduced it under stress.

Treatment
TU applicatione0
Outcome
Zn contente0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
under non-stress conditionse0
Comparator
non- application of TU treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Zn content was increased by TU application with both methods under non-stress conditions, while decreased under stress conditions compared to non- application of TU treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2459–2637 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–82 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Thiourea, especially 1000 mg L −1 foliar application, is recommended to improve wheat resistance and quality in contaminated soil.

Treatment
TUe0
Outcome
improving wheat's resistance to heavy metal stress and increasing crop quality in contaminated soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of TU as a growth regulator can be an effective strategy for improving wheat's resistance to heavy metal stress and increasing crop quality in contaminated soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3403–3580 · show in text ↑

thiourea · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.