Paper · 2025 · ACS Omega

Impact of Thiourea on Wheat’s Morpho-Physiological and Ionic Attributes (Triticum aestivum L.) under Lead Stress: Reducing the Translocation of Lead from Soil to Roots, Shoots, and Grains

Sanam Maqbool; Tahrim Ramzan; Arslan Haider; et al.

17
claims
32
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) is a key cereal crop broadly consumed across the earth. Nonetheless, abiotic stressor influences such as toxic metals severely limit its production. Thiourea (TU) is a sulfur-rich organic molecule that reduces the negative effects of environmental stresses such as heavy metals, including lead (Pb). Thus, the ongoing experiment was designed to assess the impact of thiourea amendment through soil (0 and 100 mg/L) on wheat cultivars Akbar 19 (V 1 ) and Ghazi 11 (V 2 ) under lead stress (0 mM and 15 mM Pb). The morphological features of the two cultivars (V 1 and V 2 ), comprising the fresh weight of shoots (17 and 23%), fresh weight of roots (31 and 26%), leaf area (22 and 10.9%), and total chlorophyll content (16%), were all decreased due to the toxic effects of stress caused by heavy metals. However, treatment of thiourea through soil allowed counteracting the decrease in biomass caused by heavy metals. It improved the initial weight of the shoots upto (12.5 and 14.2%), roots by (37.5 and 24%), leaf surface area upto (17.6 and 7.9%), and total chlorophyll contents (18 and 9.9%) while decreasing the MDA levels by (16.9 and 22.3%) and the activities of H 2 O 2 upto (16 and 11.5%), root Pb activity upto (8.9 and 35%) and shoot Pb activity by (12.9 and 23.8%), grain concentration upto (25 and 7.56%), soil Pb content were reduced by(17 and 16%), in both varieties (V 1 as well as V 2 ). Overall results indicate that treating wheat crops cultivated in pots with external thiourea decreased the damage from oxidation caused by lead and enhanced the antioxidant activity and ionic concentrations. Furthermore, all morpho-physiological parameters exhibited that Ghazi 11 (V 2 ) performed better relative to Akbar 19 (V 1 ). Nevertheless, note that research on wheat by application of thiourea-triggered changes in cultivation under heavy metal stress is still in its earliest stages, requiring more investigation to apply in wide fields.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lead stress decreased wheat shoot fresh weight by 17 and 23% in the two cultivars.

Treatment
stress caused by heavy metalse0
Outcome
fresh weight of shootse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
17 and 23%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fresh weight of shoots (17 and 23%), fresh weight of roots (31 and 26%), leaf area (22 and 10.9%), and total chlorophyll content (16%), were all decreased due to the toxic effects of stress caused by heavy metals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–881 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lead stress decreased wheat root fresh weight by 31 and 26%.

Treatment
stress caused by heavy metalse0
Outcome
fresh weight of rootse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
31 and 26%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fresh weight of shoots (17 and 23%), fresh weight of roots (31 and 26%), leaf area (22 and 10.9%), and total chlorophyll content (16%), were all decreased due to the toxic effects of stress caused by heavy metals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 669–881 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lead stress decreased wheat leaf area by 22 and 10.9%.

Treatment
stress caused by heavy metalse0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
22 and 10.9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leaf area (22 and 10.9%), and total chlorophyll content (16%), were all decreased due to the toxic effects of stress caused by heavy metals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–881 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lead stress decreased wheat total chlorophyll content by 16%.

Treatment
stress caused by heavy metalse0
Outcome
total chlorophyll contente0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
16%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total chlorophyll content (16%), were all decreased due to the toxic effects of stress caused by heavy metals”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 772–881 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiourea increased shoot weight by 12.5 and 14.2% under heavy metal stress.

Treatment
thiourea through soile0
Outcome
initial weight of the shootse0
Direction
improvede0
Value
12.5 and 14.2%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment of thiourea through soil allowed counteracting the decrease in biomass caused by heavy metals. It improved the initial weight of the shoots upto (12.5 and 14.2%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1063 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiourea increased root weight by 37.5 and 24%.

Treatment
thioureat0
Outcome
rootse0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
37.5 and 24%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“roots by (37.5 and 24%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1088 · show in text ↑
t0

“Thiourea on Wheat’s”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiourea increased leaf surface area by 17.6 and 7.9%.

Treatment
thioureat0
Outcome
leaf surface areae0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
17.6 and 7.9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leaf surface area upto (17.6 and 7.9%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1090–1128 · show in text ↑
t0

“Thiourea on Wheat’s”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiourea increased total chlorophyll content by 18 and 9.9%.

Treatment
thioureat0
Outcome
total chlorophyll contentse0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
18 and 9.9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total chlorophyll contents (18 and 9.9%) while decreasing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1191 · show in text ↑
t0

“Thiourea on Wheat’s”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiourea decreased MDA levels by 16.9 and 22.3%.

Treatment
thioureat0
Outcome
MDA levelse0
Direction
decreasinge0
Value
16.9 and 22.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decreasing the MDA levels by (16.9 and 22.3%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1226 · show in text ↑
t0

“Thiourea on Wheat’s”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiourea decreased H 2 O 2 activities by 16 and 11.5%.

Treatment
thioureat0
Outcome
activities of H 2 O 2e0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
16 and 11.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“activities of H 2 O 2 upto (16 and 11.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1276 · show in text ↑
t0

“Thiourea on Wheat’s”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiourea decreased root Pb activity by 8.9 and 35%.

Treatment
thioureat0
Outcome
root Pb activitye0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
8.9 and 35%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root Pb activity upto (8.9 and 35%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1313 · show in text ↑
t0

“Thiourea on Wheat’s”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiourea decreased shoot Pb activity by 12.9 and 23.8%.

Treatment
thioureat0
Outcome
shoot Pb activitye0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
12.9 and 23.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoot Pb activity by (12.9 and 23.8%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1318–1355 · show in text ↑
t0

“Thiourea on Wheat’s”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiourea decreased grain lead concentration by 25 and 7.56%.

Treatment
thioureat0
Outcome
grain concentratione0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0
Value
25 and 7.56%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain concentration upto (25 and 7.56%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1357–1396 · show in text ↑
t0

“Thiourea on Wheat’s”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiourea decreased soil Pb content by 17 and 16%.

Treatment
thioureat0
Outcome
soil Pb contente0
Direction
reducede0
Value
17 and 16%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“soil Pb content were reduced by(17 and 16%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1398–1441 · show in text ↑
t0

“Thiourea on Wheat’s”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiourea decreased oxidation damage from lead in potted wheat.

Treatment
external thioureae0
Outcome
damage from oxidation caused by leade0
Direction
decreasede0
Setting
potse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treating wheat crops cultivated in pots with external thiourea decreased the damage from oxidation caused by lead”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1514–1627 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiourea enhanced antioxidant activity and ionic concentrations in potted wheat.

Treatment
external thioureae0
Outcome
antioxidant activity and ionic concentrationse0
Direction
enhancede0
Setting
potse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treating wheat crops cultivated in pots with external thiourea decreased the damage from oxidation caused by lead and enhanced the antioxidant activity and ionic concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1514–1690 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ghazi 11 performed better than Akbar 19 across morpho-physiological parameters.

Material
Ghazi 11e0
Outcome
morpho-physiological parameterse0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
Akbar 19e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all morpho-physiological parameters exhibited that Ghazi 11 (V 2 ) performed better relative to Akbar 19 (V 1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1705–1816 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–27 · show in text ↑

thiourea · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

thiourea · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

thiourea · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

thiourea · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

thiourea · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

heavy metal · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

53 papers: 8 positive, 45 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

heavy metal · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 2 positive, 25 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.