Paper · 2025 · Indian Journal of Entomology

Efficacy of Insecticides Against Green Apple Aphid aphis Pomi De Geer

Mohd Abas Shah; Sheikh Aafreen Rehman; Hafsa Ajaz Tramboo

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The efficacy of neonicotinoid insecticides was evaluated for managing green apple aphid (GAA), Aphis pomi, in apple orchards, compared to traditional organophosphates. Organophosphates showed limited knockdown effects (51.51–68.12% reduction over control) and dropped below 50% efficacy by 7 and 14 days after treatment (DAT). In contrast, imidacloprid 17.8 SL @ 0.04% reduced GAA populations by 87.30– 91.18% at 7 DAT and 73.59–74.76% at 14 DAT. Thiamethoxam 25 WG @ 0.02% achieved 79.69–79.95% and 69.76–72.02% reductions at 7 and 14 DAT, respectively. Thiacloprid 240 SC @ 0.04% showed neither significant knockdown nor residual effect. Bifenthrin 8% SC @ 0.075% showed moderate efficacy against GAA, with better initial knockdown than sustained control. Neem oil 1500 ppm @ 0.25% gave good initial control but lacked persistence at 14 DAT (52.34–58.90%). Among combination products, thiamethoxam + lambda-cyhalothrin (12.6% + 9.5% ZC @ 0.04%) and imidacloprid + lambda-cyhalothrin (6% + 4% @ 0.06%) maintained significant control up to 14 DAT. The results support replacing organophosphates with newer chemistries like neonicotinoids. Therefore, it is concluded that the use of organophosphate insecticides should be discontinued and switch over to insecticides like neonicotinoids etc. is recommended.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organophosphates gave 51.51–68.12% initial aphid reduction and fell below 50% efficacy by 7 and 14 days.

Treatment
Organophosphatese0
Interactor
Aphis pomiAphis pomie1pest
Outcome
green apple aphide1
Direction
reductione0
Value
51.51–68.12%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphis pomi
Aphis pomi · InteractorRhetos · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Organophosphates showed limited knockdown effects (51.51–68.12% reduction over control) and dropped below 50% efficacy by 7 and 14 days after treatment (DAT).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 168–326 · show in text ↑
e1

“green apple aphid (GAA), Aphis pomi, in apple orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 70–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid reduced aphid populations by 87.30– 91.18% at 7 DAT.

Treatment
imidacloprid 17.8 SL @ 0.04%e0
Interactor
Aphis pomiAphis pomie1pest
Outcome
GAA populationse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
87.30– 91.18%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphis pomi
Aphis pomi · InteractorRhetos · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“imidacloprid 17.8 SL @ 0.04% reduced GAA populations by 87.30– 91.18% at 7 DAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–418 · show in text ↑
e1

“green apple aphid (GAA), Aphis pomi, in apple orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 70–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid reduced aphid populations by 73.59–74.76% at 14 DAT.

Treatment
imidacloprid 17.8 SL @ 0.04%e0
Interactor
Aphis pomiAphis pomie1pest
Outcome
GAA populationse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
73.59–74.76%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphis pomi
Aphis pomi · InteractorRhetos · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“imidacloprid 17.8 SL @ 0.04% reduced GAA populations by 87.30– 91.18% at 7 DAT and 73.59–74.76% at 14 DAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–445 · show in text ↑
e1

“green apple aphid (GAA), Aphis pomi, in apple orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 70–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiamethoxam reduced aphids by 79.69–79.95% at 7 DAT.

Treatment
Thiamethoxam 25 WG @ 0.02%e0
Interactor
Aphis pomiAphis pomie1pest
Outcome
green apple aphide1
Direction
reductionse0
Value
79.69–79.95%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphis pomi
Aphis pomi · InteractorRhetos · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thiamethoxam 25 WG @ 0.02% achieved 79.69–79.95% and 69.76–72.02% reductions at 7 and 14 DAT, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 447–554 · show in text ↑
e1

“green apple aphid (GAA), Aphis pomi, in apple orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 70–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiamethoxam reduced aphids by 69.76–72.02% at 14 DAT.

Treatment
Thiamethoxam 25 WG @ 0.02%e0
Interactor
Aphis pomiAphis pomie1pest
Outcome
green apple aphide1
Direction
reductionse0
Value
69.76–72.02%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphis pomi
Aphis pomi · InteractorRhetos · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thiamethoxam 25 WG @ 0.02% achieved 79.69–79.95% and 69.76–72.02% reductions at 7 and 14 DAT, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 447–554 · show in text ↑
e1

“green apple aphid (GAA), Aphis pomi, in apple orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 70–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiacloprid had neither significant knockdown nor residual effect.

Treatment
Thiacloprid 240 SC @ 0.04%e0
Interactor
Aphis pomiAphis pomie1pest
Outcome
knockdown nor residual effecte0
Direction
neithere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphis pomi
Aphis pomi · InteractorRhetos · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thiacloprid 240 SC @ 0.04% showed neither significant knockdown nor residual effect.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 555–639 · show in text ↑
e1

“green apple aphid (GAA), Aphis pomi, in apple orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 70–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bifenthrin gave moderate aphid control with stronger initial than sustained knockdown.

Treatment
Bifenthrin 8% SC @ 0.075%e0
Interactor
Aphis pomiAphis pomie1pest
Outcome
efficacy against GAAe0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
sustained controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphis pomi
Aphis pomi · InteractorRhetos · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bifenthrin 8% SC @ 0.075% showed moderate efficacy against GAA, with better initial knockdown than sustained control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–757 · show in text ↑
e1

“green apple aphid (GAA), Aphis pomi, in apple orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 70–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem oil gave initial control but weak persistence at 14 DAT, with 52.34–58.90% efficacy.

Treatment
Neem oil 1500 ppm @ 0.25%e0
Interactor
Aphis pomiAphis pomie1pest
Outcome
controle0
Direction
lacked persistencee0
Value
52.34–58.90%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphis pomi
Aphis pomi · InteractorRhetos · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neem oil 1500 ppm @ 0.25% gave good initial control but lacked persistence at 14 DAT (52.34–58.90%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–858 · show in text ↑
e1

“green apple aphid (GAA), Aphis pomi, in apple orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 70–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiamethoxam plus lambda-cyhalothrin maintained significant aphid control to 14 DAT.

Treatment
thiamethoxam + lambda-cyhalothrin (12.6% + 9.5% ZC @ 0.04%)e0
Interactor
Aphis pomiAphis pomie1pest
Outcome
controle0
Direction
maintainede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphis pomi
Aphis pomi · InteractorRhetos · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“thiamethoxam + lambda-cyhalothrin (12.6% + 9.5% ZC @ 0.04%) and imidacloprid + lambda-cyhalothrin (6% + 4% @ 0.06%) maintained significant control up to 14 DAT.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–1047 · show in text ↑
e1

“green apple aphid (GAA), Aphis pomi, in apple orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 70–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Imidacloprid plus lambda-cyhalothrin maintained significant aphid control to 14 DAT.

Treatment
imidacloprid + lambda-cyhalothrin (6% + 4% @ 0.06%)e0
Interactor
Aphis pomiAphis pomie1pest
Outcome
controle0
Direction
maintainede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aphis pomi
Aphis pomi · InteractorRhetos · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“thiamethoxam + lambda-cyhalothrin (12.6% + 9.5% ZC @ 0.04%) and imidacloprid + lambda-cyhalothrin (6% + 4% @ 0.06%) maintained significant control up to 14 DAT.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–1047 · show in text ↑
e1

“green apple aphid (GAA), Aphis pomi, in apple orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 70–124 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend discontinuing organophosphates and switching to neonicotinoids.

Outcome
the use of organophosphate insecticides should be discontinued and switch over to insecticides like neonicotinoidse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of organophosphate insecticides should be discontinued and switch over to insecticides like neonicotinoids etc. is recommended.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1306 · show in text ↑
e1

“green apple aphid (GAA), Aphis pomi, in apple orchards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 70–124 · show in text ↑

imidacloprid · Aphis pomi · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.