Paper · 2025 · The future of Horticulture

Role of Mycorrhizal Fungi in Reducing the Harmful Effects of Salinity on Grapevines Seedlings Grown Hydroponically

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The effect of salinity stress on ‘Flame Seedless’ and ‘Superior Seedless’ grapevines seedlings (Vitis vinifera L.) grown hydroponically under salinity stress conditions, as well as the effectiveness of inoculation with Arbuscular Mycorrhizae Fungi (AMF) in reducing the harmful effects of salinity stress were investigated during 2022 and 2023 seasons. The investigation was carried out under Laboratory conditions, whereas the temperature was fixed at 25 ± 3 and relative humidity at 80 ± 5, referenced nutrient solution adapted with grapevines needs was used. The obtained results confirmed that, all vegetative parameters, fresh and dry weight of shoot and root systems, eaves main pigments and mineral status of both cultivars were negatively affected by increasing the salinity level in the nutrient solution. However, inoculated the seedlings with AMF significantly reduced these harmful effects of both cultivars. During both experimental seasons, the response of Flame Seedless seedlings to AMF inoculations was more perspicuous rather than those of Superior Seedless seedlings, these findings were true in most studied traits.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity negatively affected vegetative parameters of both grapevine cultivars.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
Treatment
increasing the salinity level in the nutrient solutione1
Outcome
vegetative parameterse1
Direction
negatively affectede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grapevines seedlings (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 74–114 · show in text ↑
e1

“all vegetative parameters, fresh and dry weight of shoot and root systems, eaves main pigments and mineral status of both cultivars were negatively affected by increasing the salinity level in the nutrient solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–813 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity negatively affected fresh and dry weight of shoot and root systems of both grapevine cultivars.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
Treatment
increasing the salinity level in the nutrient solutione1
Outcome
fresh and dry weight of shoot and root systemse1
Direction
negatively affectede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grapevines seedlings (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 74–114 · show in text ↑
e1

“all vegetative parameters, fresh and dry weight of shoot and root systems, eaves main pigments and mineral status of both cultivars were negatively affected by increasing the salinity level in the nutrient solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–813 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity negatively affected leaf main pigments and mineral status of both grapevine cultivars.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
Treatment
increasing the salinity level in the nutrient solutione1
Outcome
main pigments and mineral statuse1
Direction
negatively affectede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grapevines seedlings (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 74–114 · show in text ↑
e1

“all vegetative parameters, fresh and dry weight of shoot and root systems, eaves main pigments and mineral status of both cultivars were negatively affected by increasing the salinity level in the nutrient solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–813 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi significantly reduced the harmful effects of salinity on both grapevine cultivars.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
Treatment
inoculated the seedlings with AMFe1
Interactor
AMFe1symbiont
Outcome
harmful effectse1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grapevines seedlings (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 74–114 · show in text ↑
e1

“inoculated the seedlings with AMF significantly reduced these harmful effects of both cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–919 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flame Seedless responded more strongly than Superior Seedless to AMF inoculation under salinity.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae0
Material
Flame Seedlesse1
Treatment
AMF inoculationse1
Interactor
AMFe1symbiont
Outcome
responsee1
Direction
more perspicuouse1
Comparator
Superior Seedless seedlingse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grapevines seedlings (Vitis vinifera L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 74–114 · show in text ↑
e1

“the response of Flame Seedless seedlings to AMF inoculations was more perspicuous rather than those of Superior Seedless seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1085 · show in text ↑

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

salinity · growth · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fertilization · growth · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.