Paper · 2025 · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science

Effect of Pruning and Fertilization with Bio Fertilizer (Mycorrhiza) on Some Growth Characteristics and Yield of Grape Vines (Vitis vinifera L.) CV. Francy

Suzan Ali Hussein; Mahmood Fadhil Al-Doori

17
claims
50
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract The experiment was conducted in the grape field of the Department of Horticulture and Landscape Engineering/Tikrit University, Iraq, during the growing season 0202 on 6-year old Francy grape vines, to study the effect of pruning at three levels (4.5 and 6) canes vine −1 with 12 eyes per cane and fertilizing with Mycorrhiza biofertilizer at three levels (0, 15 and 30) gm vine −1 once immediately after pruning on 16/2/2024 on some vegetative growth characteristics and quantitative and qualitative yield characteristics. The experiment was designed according to a complete randomized block design as a factorial experiment with three replicates and two vines per experimental unit. The total number of vines included in the study was 54 vines. The results obtained were summarized as follows: Pruning at the level of 4 canes vine −1 at a rate of (48 eyes vine −1 ) led to a significant increase in the relative chlorophyll rate of leaves, cluster weight, percentage of soluble solids, total sugars, and anthocyanin rate in fruits, and a decrease in the total acidity rate in fruits, while pruning at the level of 6 canes vine −1 led to a significant increase in the average number of clusters, which reached 25.62 gm, the two pruning treatments at the level of 4 and 5 canes vine −1 resulted in a significant superiority in leaf area and yield per grapevine. Fertilization at a level of 30 gm vine −1 of the biofertilizer led to a significant increase in leaf area, relative chlorophyll content of leaves, average number of clusters, percentage of soluble solids, total sugars and fruit content of anthocyanin, which reached (78.11 cm 2 , 19.45 CCI, 25.11 clusters vine −1 , 16.84%, 15.42%, 0.67 mg 100g −1 ) respectively. The two traits of cluster weight and grape yield were significantly affected by two levels of biofertilizer, 15 and 30 gm vine −1 , both levels of biofertilizer also led to a reduction in the total acidity of the fruits, which reaches 0.38%. The two-way interaction between the levels of pruning and bio-fertilization with mycorrhiza fertilizer had a clear significant effect on the vegetative characteristics and quantitative and qualitative yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning at 4 canes per vine significantly increased the relative chlorophyll rate of leaves.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Material
Francyt0
Organ / stage
leavese1
Treatment
Pruning at the level of 4 canese1
Outcome
relative chlorophyll rate of leavese1
Direction
increasee1
Setting
Tikrit University, Iraqe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of Pruning and Fertilization with Bio Fertilizer (Mycorrhiza) on Some Growth Characteristics and Yield of Grape Vines (Vitis vinifera L.) CV. Francy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–155 · show in text ↑
e0

“Department of Horticulture and Landscape Engineering/Tikrit University, Iraq”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 64–140 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pruning at the level of 4 canes vine −1 at a rate of (48 eyes vine −1 ) led to a significant increase in the relative chlorophyll rate of leaves, cluster weight, percentage of soluble solids, total sugars, and anthocyanin rate in fruits, and a decrease in the total acidity rate in fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–1092 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning at 4 canes per vine significantly increased cluster weight.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Material
Francyt0
Treatment
Pruning at the level of 4 canese1
Outcome
cluster weighte1
Direction
increasee1
Setting
Tikrit University, Iraqe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of Pruning and Fertilization with Bio Fertilizer (Mycorrhiza) on Some Growth Characteristics and Yield of Grape Vines (Vitis vinifera L.) CV. Francy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–155 · show in text ↑
e0

“Department of Horticulture and Landscape Engineering/Tikrit University, Iraq”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 64–140 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pruning at the level of 4 canes vine −1 at a rate of (48 eyes vine −1 ) led to a significant increase in the relative chlorophyll rate of leaves, cluster weight, percentage of soluble solids, total sugars, and anthocyanin rate in fruits, and a decrease in the total acidity rate in fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–1092 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning at 4 canes per vine significantly increased soluble solids, total sugars and anthocyanin rate in fruits.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Material
Francyt0
Organ / stage
fruitse1
Treatment
Pruning at the level of 4 canese1
Outcome
percentage of soluble solids, total sugars, and anthocyanin ratee1
Direction
increasee1
Setting
Tikrit University, Iraqe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of Pruning and Fertilization with Bio Fertilizer (Mycorrhiza) on Some Growth Characteristics and Yield of Grape Vines (Vitis vinifera L.) CV. Francy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–155 · show in text ↑
e0

“Department of Horticulture and Landscape Engineering/Tikrit University, Iraq”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 64–140 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pruning at the level of 4 canes vine −1 at a rate of (48 eyes vine −1 ) led to a significant increase in the relative chlorophyll rate of leaves, cluster weight, percentage of soluble solids, total sugars, and anthocyanin rate in fruits, and a decrease in the total acidity rate in fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–1092 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning at 4 canes per vine decreased total acidity rate in fruits.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Material
Francyt0
Organ / stage
fruitse1
Treatment
Pruning at the level of 4 canese1
Outcome
total acidity ratee1
Direction
decreasee1
Setting
Tikrit University, Iraqe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of Pruning and Fertilization with Bio Fertilizer (Mycorrhiza) on Some Growth Characteristics and Yield of Grape Vines (Vitis vinifera L.) CV. Francy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–155 · show in text ↑
e0

“Department of Horticulture and Landscape Engineering/Tikrit University, Iraq”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 64–140 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pruning at the level of 4 canes vine −1 at a rate of (48 eyes vine −1 ) led to a significant increase in the relative chlorophyll rate of leaves, cluster weight, percentage of soluble solids, total sugars, and anthocyanin rate in fruits, and a decrease in the total acidity rate in fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–1092 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning at 6 canes per vine significantly increased the average number of clusters, reaching 25.62 gm.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Material
Francyt0
Treatment
pruning at the level of 6 canese2
Outcome
average number of clusterse2
Direction
increasee2
Value
25.62 gme2
Setting
Tikrit University, Iraqe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of Pruning and Fertilization with Bio Fertilizer (Mycorrhiza) on Some Growth Characteristics and Yield of Grape Vines (Vitis vinifera L.) CV. Francy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–155 · show in text ↑
e0

“Department of Horticulture and Landscape Engineering/Tikrit University, Iraq”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 64–140 · show in text ↑
e2

“while pruning at the level of 6 canes vine −1 led to a significant increase in the average number of clusters, which reached 25.62 gm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1227 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning at 4 and 5 canes per vine gave a significant superiority in leaf area.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Material
Francyt0
Treatment
4 and 5 canese3
Outcome
leaf areae3
Direction
superioritye3
Setting
Tikrit University, Iraqe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of Pruning and Fertilization with Bio Fertilizer (Mycorrhiza) on Some Growth Characteristics and Yield of Grape Vines (Vitis vinifera L.) CV. Francy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–155 · show in text ↑
e0

“Department of Horticulture and Landscape Engineering/Tikrit University, Iraq”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 64–140 · show in text ↑
e3

“the two pruning treatments at the level of 4 and 5 canes vine −1 resulted in a significant superiority in leaf area and yield per grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1368 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pruning at 4 and 5 canes per vine gave a significant superiority in yield per grapevine.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Material
Francyt0
Treatment
4 and 5 canese3
Outcome
yield per grapevinee3
Direction
superioritye3
Setting
Tikrit University, Iraqe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of Pruning and Fertilization with Bio Fertilizer (Mycorrhiza) on Some Growth Characteristics and Yield of Grape Vines (Vitis vinifera L.) CV. Francy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–155 · show in text ↑
e0

“Department of Horticulture and Landscape Engineering/Tikrit University, Iraq”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 64–140 · show in text ↑
e3

“the two pruning treatments at the level of 4 and 5 canes vine −1 resulted in a significant superiority in leaf area and yield per grapevine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1368 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization at 30 gm per vine with biofertilizer significantly increased leaf area to 78.11 cm2.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Material
Francyt0
Treatment
Fertilization at a level of 30 gme4
Interactor
Mycorrhizat0symbiont
Outcome
leaf areae4
Direction
increasee4
Value
78.11 cm 2e4
Setting
Tikrit University, Iraqe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of Pruning and Fertilization with Bio Fertilizer (Mycorrhiza) on Some Growth Characteristics and Yield of Grape Vines (Vitis vinifera L.) CV. Francy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–155 · show in text ↑
e0

“Department of Horticulture and Landscape Engineering/Tikrit University, Iraq”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 64–140 · show in text ↑
e4

“Fertilization at a level of 30 gm vine −1 of the biofertilizer led to a significant increase in leaf area, relative chlorophyll content of leaves, average number of clusters, percentage of soluble solids, total sugars and fruit content of anthocyanin, which reached (78.11 cm 2 , 19.45 CCI, 25.11 clusters vine −1 , 16.84%, 15.42%, 0.67 mg 100g −1 ) respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1370–1732 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization at 30 gm per vine with biofertilizer significantly increased relative chlorophyll content of leaves to 19.45 CCI.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Material
Francyt0
Organ / stage
leavese4
Treatment
Fertilization at a level of 30 gme4
Interactor
Mycorrhizat0symbiont
Outcome
relative chlorophyll content of leavese4
Direction
increasee4
Value
19.45 CCIe4
Setting
Tikrit University, Iraqe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of Pruning and Fertilization with Bio Fertilizer (Mycorrhiza) on Some Growth Characteristics and Yield of Grape Vines (Vitis vinifera L.) CV. Francy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–155 · show in text ↑
e0

“Department of Horticulture and Landscape Engineering/Tikrit University, Iraq”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 64–140 · show in text ↑
e4

“Fertilization at a level of 30 gm vine −1 of the biofertilizer led to a significant increase in leaf area, relative chlorophyll content of leaves, average number of clusters, percentage of soluble solids, total sugars and fruit content of anthocyanin, which reached (78.11 cm 2 , 19.45 CCI, 25.11 clusters vine −1 , 16.84%, 15.42%, 0.67 mg 100g −1 ) respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1370–1732 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization at 30 gm per vine with biofertilizer significantly increased the average number of clusters to 25.11 clusters per vine.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Material
Francyt0
Treatment
Fertilization at a level of 30 gme4
Interactor
Mycorrhizat0symbiont
Outcome
average number of clusterse4
Direction
increasee4
Value
25.11 clusters vine −1e4
Setting
Tikrit University, Iraqe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of Pruning and Fertilization with Bio Fertilizer (Mycorrhiza) on Some Growth Characteristics and Yield of Grape Vines (Vitis vinifera L.) CV. Francy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–155 · show in text ↑
e0

“Department of Horticulture and Landscape Engineering/Tikrit University, Iraq”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 64–140 · show in text ↑
e4

“Fertilization at a level of 30 gm vine −1 of the biofertilizer led to a significant increase in leaf area, relative chlorophyll content of leaves, average number of clusters, percentage of soluble solids, total sugars and fruit content of anthocyanin, which reached (78.11 cm 2 , 19.45 CCI, 25.11 clusters vine −1 , 16.84%, 15.42%, 0.67 mg 100g −1 ) respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1370–1732 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization at 30 gm per vine with biofertilizer significantly increased percentage of soluble solids to 16.84%.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Material
Francyt0
Treatment
Fertilization at a level of 30 gme4
Interactor
Mycorrhizat0symbiont
Outcome
percentage of soluble solidse4
Direction
increasee4
Value
16.84%e4
Setting
Tikrit University, Iraqe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of Pruning and Fertilization with Bio Fertilizer (Mycorrhiza) on Some Growth Characteristics and Yield of Grape Vines (Vitis vinifera L.) CV. Francy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–155 · show in text ↑
e0

“Department of Horticulture and Landscape Engineering/Tikrit University, Iraq”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 64–140 · show in text ↑
e4

“Fertilization at a level of 30 gm vine −1 of the biofertilizer led to a significant increase in leaf area, relative chlorophyll content of leaves, average number of clusters, percentage of soluble solids, total sugars and fruit content of anthocyanin, which reached (78.11 cm 2 , 19.45 CCI, 25.11 clusters vine −1 , 16.84%, 15.42%, 0.67 mg 100g −1 ) respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1370–1732 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization at 30 gm per vine with biofertilizer significantly increased total sugars to 15.42%.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Material
Francyt0
Treatment
Fertilization at a level of 30 gme4
Interactor
Mycorrhizat0symbiont
Outcome
total sugarse4
Direction
increasee4
Value
15.42%e4
Setting
Tikrit University, Iraqe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of Pruning and Fertilization with Bio Fertilizer (Mycorrhiza) on Some Growth Characteristics and Yield of Grape Vines (Vitis vinifera L.) CV. Francy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–155 · show in text ↑
e0

“Department of Horticulture and Landscape Engineering/Tikrit University, Iraq”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 64–140 · show in text ↑
e4

“Fertilization at a level of 30 gm vine −1 of the biofertilizer led to a significant increase in leaf area, relative chlorophyll content of leaves, average number of clusters, percentage of soluble solids, total sugars and fruit content of anthocyanin, which reached (78.11 cm 2 , 19.45 CCI, 25.11 clusters vine −1 , 16.84%, 15.42%, 0.67 mg 100g −1 ) respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1370–1732 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization at 30 gm per vine with biofertilizer significantly increased fruit anthocyanin content to 0.67 mg 100g −1.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Material
Francyt0
Organ / stage
fruite4
Treatment
Fertilization at a level of 30 gme4
Interactor
Mycorrhizat0symbiont
Outcome
fruit content of anthocyanine4
Direction
increasee4
Value
0.67 mg 100g −1e4
Setting
Tikrit University, Iraqe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of Pruning and Fertilization with Bio Fertilizer (Mycorrhiza) on Some Growth Characteristics and Yield of Grape Vines (Vitis vinifera L.) CV. Francy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–155 · show in text ↑
e0

“Department of Horticulture and Landscape Engineering/Tikrit University, Iraq”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 64–140 · show in text ↑
e4

“Fertilization at a level of 30 gm vine −1 of the biofertilizer led to a significant increase in leaf area, relative chlorophyll content of leaves, average number of clusters, percentage of soluble solids, total sugars and fruit content of anthocyanin, which reached (78.11 cm 2 , 19.45 CCI, 25.11 clusters vine −1 , 16.84%, 15.42%, 0.67 mg 100g −1 ) respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1370–1732 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer at 15 and 30 gm per vine significantly affected cluster weight.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Material
Francyt0
Treatment
two levels of biofertilizere5
Interactor
Mycorrhizat0symbiont
Outcome
cluster weighte5
Setting
Tikrit University, Iraqe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of Pruning and Fertilization with Bio Fertilizer (Mycorrhiza) on Some Growth Characteristics and Yield of Grape Vines (Vitis vinifera L.) CV. Francy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–155 · show in text ↑
e0

“Department of Horticulture and Landscape Engineering/Tikrit University, Iraq”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 64–140 · show in text ↑
e5

“The two traits of cluster weight and grape yield were significantly affected by two levels of biofertilizer, 15 and 30 gm vine −1 , both levels of biofertilizer also led to a reduction in the total acidity of the fruits, which reaches 0.38%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1734–1974 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer at 15 and 30 gm per vine significantly affected grape yield.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Material
Francyt0
Treatment
two levels of biofertilizere5
Interactor
Mycorrhizat0symbiont
Outcome
grape yielde5
Setting
Tikrit University, Iraqe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of Pruning and Fertilization with Bio Fertilizer (Mycorrhiza) on Some Growth Characteristics and Yield of Grape Vines (Vitis vinifera L.) CV. Francy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–155 · show in text ↑
e0

“Department of Horticulture and Landscape Engineering/Tikrit University, Iraq”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 64–140 · show in text ↑
e5

“The two traits of cluster weight and grape yield were significantly affected by two levels of biofertilizer, 15 and 30 gm vine −1 , both levels of biofertilizer also led to a reduction in the total acidity of the fruits, which reaches 0.38%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1734–1974 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both biofertilizer levels reduced total acidity of the fruits to 0.38%.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Material
Francyt0
Organ / stage
fruitse5
Treatment
both levels of biofertilizere5
Interactor
Mycorrhizat0symbiont
Outcome
total acidity of the fruitse5
Direction
reductione5
Value
0.38%e5
Setting
Tikrit University, Iraqe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of Pruning and Fertilization with Bio Fertilizer (Mycorrhiza) on Some Growth Characteristics and Yield of Grape Vines (Vitis vinifera L.) CV. Francy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–155 · show in text ↑
e0

“Department of Horticulture and Landscape Engineering/Tikrit University, Iraq”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 64–140 · show in text ↑
e5

“The two traits of cluster weight and grape yield were significantly affected by two levels of biofertilizer, 15 and 30 gm vine −1 , both levels of biofertilizer also led to a reduction in the total acidity of the fruits, which reaches 0.38%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1734–1974 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The pruning by biofertilizer interaction had a clear significant effect on vegetative characteristics and quantitative and qualitative yield.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
Treatment
two-way interaction between the levels of pruning and bio-fertilizatione6
Interactor
mycorrhizae6symbiont
Outcome
vegetative characteristics and quantitative and qualitative yielde6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Effect of Pruning and Fertilization with Bio Fertilizer (Mycorrhiza) on Some Growth Characteristics and Yield of Grape Vines (Vitis vinifera L.) CV. Francy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–155 · show in text ↑
e6

“The two-way interaction between the levels of pruning and bio-fertilization with mycorrhiza fertilizer had a clear significant effect on the vegetative characteristics and quantitative and qualitative yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1976–2182 · show in text ↑

pruning · quality: sugar starch · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results differ

54 papers: 38 positive, 16 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

transgenic · yield · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

pruning · physiology: pigments · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

fertilization · growth · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 17 positive, 4 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

pruning · yield · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

95 papers: 41 positive, 54 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 51 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

91 papers more in this group

See all 95 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.