Paper · 2013 · Hubei nongye kexue

Effect of Calcium, Magnesium and Sulphur Fertilizer on Wine Grape in Eastern Foot of Helan Mountain

Shi Min

8
claims
12
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

To solve the problems of single chemical fertilizer, few kinds of fertilizer and low utilization in wine grape cultivation in eastern foot of Helan Mountain, 4 kinds of treatment including no fertilizer(control), conventional fertilization, conventional fertilization with calcium-magnesia phosphate fertilizer, conventional fertilization with calcium, magnesium and sulphur fertilizer, and humic acid fertilizer was set. The growth, production, quality, and soil physicochemical property of wine grape under each treatment was measured. Results showed that CaMgS plus humic acid fertilizer played a significant role in improving pH of wine grape in arid sandy soil vineyards. On the basis of conventional fertilization, increasing CaMgS plus humic acid fertilizer can effectively improve the chlorophyll content of leaves, promote the accumulation of petiole potassium pigment and increase the production growth. CaMgS treatment significantly increased the Vitamin C content and soluble solids of wine grape, but significantly reduced the total acidity. When the humic acid fertilizer treatment was increased, the sugaracid ratio reached up to 31.94 and the wine grape quality was improved compared with conventional fertilization.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CaMgS with humic acid fertilizer significantly improved vineyard soil pH.

Taxon
wine grapeVitis viniferae0
Treatment
CaMgS plus humic acid fertilizere0
Outcome
pH of wine grape in arid sandy soil vineyardse0
Direction
improvinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CaMgS plus humic acid fertilizer played a significant role in improving pH of wine grape in arid sandy soil vineyards.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–676 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CaMgS with humic acid fertilizer improved wine grape leaf chlorophyll content.

Taxon
Wine GrapeVitis viniferat0
Treatment
increasing CaMgS plus humic acid fertilizere0
Outcome
chlorophyll content of leavese0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing CaMgS plus humic acid fertilizer can effectively improve the chlorophyll content of leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–822 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wine Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CaMgS with humic acid fertilizer promoted accumulation of petiole potassium pigment.

Taxon
Wine GrapeVitis viniferat0
Outcome
accumulation of petiole potassium pigmente0
Direction
promotee0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“promote the accumulation of petiole potassium pigment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–877 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wine Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CaMgS with humic acid fertilizer increased wine grape production growth.

Taxon
Wine GrapeVitis viniferat0
Outcome
production growthe0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increase the production growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–912 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wine Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CaMgS significantly increased grape Vitamin C content and soluble solids.

Taxon
wine grapeVitis viniferae0
Treatment
CaMgS treatmente0
Outcome
Vitamin C content and soluble solidse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CaMgS treatment significantly increased the Vitamin C content and soluble solids of wine grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–1008 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CaMgS significantly reduced grape total acidity.

Taxon
wine grapeVitis viniferae0
Treatment
CaMgS treatmente0
Outcome
total aciditye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CaMgS treatment significantly increased the Vitamin C content and soluble solids of wine grape, but significantly reduced the total acidity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–1054 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid fertilizer raised the wine grape sugaracid ratio to 31.94.

Taxon
Wine GrapeVitis viniferat0
Treatment
humic acid fertilizer treatmente0
Outcome
sugaracid ratioe0
Direction
reached up toe0
Value
31.94e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When the humic acid fertilizer treatment was increased, the sugaracid ratio reached up to 31.94”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1150 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wine Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid fertilizer improved grape quality relative to conventional fertilization.

Taxon
wine grapeVitis viniferae0
Outcome
wine grape qualitye0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
conventional fertilizatione0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wine grape quality was improved compared with conventional fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1159–1231 · show in text ↑

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

other · physiology: pigments · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.