Paper · 2025 · Potato Research

Use of Biological Control Agents and Plant Resistance Inducers for the Control of Potato Late Blight (Phytophthora infestans)

Marian Põldmets; Mati Koppel; Britt Puidet; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Late blight ( Phytophthora infestans ) is a major disease in potato cultivation, managed primarily with synthetic fungicides. This reliance makes potatoes one of the crops with the highest fungicide load. To reduce chemical dependence and promote integrated pest management (IPM), alternative solutions are needed. This study explores biological control agents (BCAs) and plant resistance inducers (PRIs) as sustainable alternatives. We screened 17 BCAs and 3 PRIs in a detached leaf assay (DLA) and selected the most effective for further trials. The chosen BCAs—Polyversum ( Pythium oligandrum ), Nvs 2 ( Bacillus amyloliquefaciens ), TC 4 ( Trichoderma atroviride ), TC 6 ( T. harzianum )—and the PRI ChiProPlant (Chitosan hydrochloride) were tested in glasshouse and field trials across five European countries. In glasshouse trials, ChiProPlant and T. atroviride significantly controlled late blight. The applied doses did not affect the efficacy of most BCAs and PRI; however, application timing proved to be crucial in the glasshouse trials. Treatments applied 1 and 5 days before inoculation were most effective, while post-inoculation treatments were least effective. Field trials showed that weekly applications of ChiProPlant, Polyversum, and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens significantly reduced late blight infection. However, none matched the efficacy of synthetic fungicides. This study highlights the potential of BCAs and PRIs in late blight management but underscores the need for further research to optimize their integration into IPM strategies.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ChiProPlant significantly controlled late blight in glasshouse trials.

Treatment
ChiProPlante0
Outcome
late blighte0
Direction
controllede0
Setting
glasshousee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In glasshouse trials, ChiProPlant and T. atroviride significantly controlled late blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–913 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T. atroviride significantly controlled late blight in glasshouse trials.

Treatment
T. atroviridee0
Interactor
T. atrovirideTrichoderma atroviridee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
late blighte0
Direction
controllede0
Setting
glasshousee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma atroviride
Trichoderma atroviride · InteractorGarrett Taylor · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In glasshouse trials, ChiProPlant and T. atroviride significantly controlled late blight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–913 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied dose did not change efficacy for most agents.

Treatment
applied dosese0
Outcome
efficacy of most BCAs and PRIe0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applied doses did not affect the efficacy of most BCAs and PRI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–981 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–88 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application timing affected efficacy in glasshouse trials.

Outcome
application timinge0
Setting
glasshouse trialse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application timing proved to be crucial in the glasshouse trials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1056 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments applied one and five days before inoculation were most effective.

Treatment
Treatments applied 1 and 5 days before inoculatione0
Outcome
most effectivee0
Direction
most effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatments applied 1 and 5 days before inoculation were most effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1058–1128 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments applied after inoculation were least effective.

Treatment
post-inoculation treatmentse0
Outcome
least effectivee0
Direction
least effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“post-inoculation treatments were least effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1184 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weekly ChiProPlant applications significantly reduced late blight infection in field trials.

Treatment
weekly applications of ChiProPlante0
Outcome
late blight infectione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weekly applications of ChiProPlant, Polyversum, and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens significantly reduced late blight infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1211–1333 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weekly Polyversum applications significantly reduced late blight infection in field trials.

Treatment
Polyversume0
Interactor
Polyversume0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
late blight infectione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weekly applications of ChiProPlant, Polyversum, and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens significantly reduced late blight infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1211–1333 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weekly Bacillus amyloliquefaciens applications significantly reduced late blight infection in field trials.

Treatment
Bacillus amyloliquefaciense0
Interactor
Bacillus amyloliquefaciensBacillus amyloliquefaciense0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
late blight infectione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens · InteractorAgricultural Research Service (NRRL)Culture Collection · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“weekly applications of ChiProPlant, Polyversum, and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens significantly reduced late blight infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1211–1333 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

None of the field treatments matched synthetic fungicide efficacy.

Outcome
efficacye0
Direction
none matchede0
Comparator
synthetic fungicidese0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“none matched the efficacy of synthetic fungicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1344–1393 · show in text ↑
t0

“Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–88 · show in text ↑

Bacillus amyloliquefaciens · disease · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Trichoderma atroviride · disease · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.