Paper · 2025 · Plant Science Today

Effect of nano urea foliar application on urea reduction, rice productivity and economic feasibility

T Ramesh; S Avudaithai; S Rathika; et al.

6
claims
23
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Nano urea technology is gaining importance mainly due to improvement in crop yields besides reducing environmental issues. It is essential to study the effect of foliar application of nano urea on reduction of conventional urea, growth, grain productivity and net profit of rice. A field experiment was carried out at ADAC & RI, TNAU, Tiruchirappalli during Rabi, 2023. The treatments consisted of three levels of nitrogen (100, 75 and 50 %), nano urea (0.4 %) foliar application in twice (Active Tillering (AI) and Panicle Initiation (PI) stages) and thrice (AT, PI and Flowering stages) combined with 75 and 50 % N and control. Rice variety TRY 5 was used. The results showed that 100 % N application as conventional urea registered significantly increased growth, grain productivity (5200 kg/ha) of rice over lower levels of N and control. However, it was statistically comparable with 75 % N + nano urea (0.4 %) foliar application either two times (AT and PI stages) or three times (AT, PI and Flowering stages). Reducing 25 % N and substituting with nano urea spray twice or thrice showed comparable results with 100 % N. Nano urea spray either two or three times were comparable with each other, indicated that two sprays were sufficient. Economics of nitrogen application found that higher BCR (2.62) was obtained with application of conventional urea at 100 % N over other treatments. 75 % N application in soil + nano urea foliar application twice (AT and PI stages) and thrice (AT, PI and flowering period) gave similar BCR of 2.41.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100 % nitrogen conventional urea treatment significantly increased rice growth over lower nitrogen levels and control.

Material
TRY 5e2
Treatment
100 % N application as conventional ureae3
Outcome
growthe3
Direction
increasede3
Comparator
lower levels of N and controle3
Setting
ADAC & RI, TNAU, Tiruchirappallie1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It is essential to study the effect of foliar application of nano urea on reduction of conventional urea, growth, grain productivity and net profit of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 123–278 · show in text ↑
e1

“A field experiment was carried out at ADAC & RI, TNAU, Tiruchirappalli during Rabi, 2023”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–368 · show in text ↑
e2

“Rice variety TRY 5 was used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–657 · show in text ↑
e3

“The results showed that 100 % N application as conventional urea registered significantly increased growth, grain productivity (5200 kg/ha) of rice over lower levels of N and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–841 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100 % nitrogen conventional urea treatment significantly increased rice grain productivity to 5200 kg/ha over lower nitrogen levels and control.

Material
TRY 5e2
Treatment
100 % N application as conventional ureae3
Outcome
grain productivitye3
Direction
increasede3
Value
5200 kg/hae3
Comparator
lower levels of N and controle3
Setting
ADAC & RI, TNAU, Tiruchirappallie1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It is essential to study the effect of foliar application of nano urea on reduction of conventional urea, growth, grain productivity and net profit of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 123–278 · show in text ↑
e1

“A field experiment was carried out at ADAC & RI, TNAU, Tiruchirappalli during Rabi, 2023”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–368 · show in text ↑
e2

“Rice variety TRY 5 was used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–657 · show in text ↑
e3

“The results showed that 100 % N application as conventional urea registered significantly increased growth, grain productivity (5200 kg/ha) of rice over lower levels of N and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–841 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice grain productivity under 75 % nitrogen with two or three nano urea foliar sprays was statistically comparable to the 100 % nitrogen conventional urea treatment.

Material
TRY 5e2
Treatment
75 % N + nano urea (0.4 %) foliar applicatione4
Outcome
grain productivitye3
Direction
statistically comparablee4
Comparator
100 % N application as conventional ureae3
Setting
ADAC & RI, TNAU, Tiruchirappallie1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It is essential to study the effect of foliar application of nano urea on reduction of conventional urea, growth, grain productivity and net profit of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 123–278 · show in text ↑
e1

“A field experiment was carried out at ADAC & RI, TNAU, Tiruchirappalli during Rabi, 2023”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–368 · show in text ↑
e2

“Rice variety TRY 5 was used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–657 · show in text ↑
e3

“The results showed that 100 % N application as conventional urea registered significantly increased growth, grain productivity (5200 kg/ha) of rice over lower levels of N and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–841 · show in text ↑
e4

“However, it was statistically comparable with 75 % N + nano urea (0.4 %) foliar application either two times (AT and PI stages) or three times (AT, PI and Flowering stages)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–1015 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Two nano urea sprays were sufficient, as two or three sprays gave comparable results.

Treatment
Nano urea spraye5
Outcome
two sprays were sufficiente5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It is essential to study the effect of foliar application of nano urea on reduction of conventional urea, growth, grain productivity and net profit of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 123–278 · show in text ↑
e5

“Nano urea spray either two or three times were comparable with each other, indicated that two sprays were sufficient”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1243 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100 % nitrogen conventional urea treatment gave a higher benefit-cost ratio (2.62) than the other treatments.

Material
TRY 5e2
Treatment
conventional urea at 100 % Ne6
Outcome
BCRe6
Direction
highere6
Value
2.62e6
Comparator
other treatmentse6
Setting
ADAC & RI, TNAU, Tiruchirappallie1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It is essential to study the effect of foliar application of nano urea on reduction of conventional urea, growth, grain productivity and net profit of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 123–278 · show in text ↑
e1

“A field experiment was carried out at ADAC & RI, TNAU, Tiruchirappalli during Rabi, 2023”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–368 · show in text ↑
e2

“Rice variety TRY 5 was used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–657 · show in text ↑
e6

“higher BCR (2.62) was obtained with application of conventional urea at 100 % N over other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1290–1391 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 75 % nitrogen soil application with nano urea foliar sprays applied twice or thrice gave a similar benefit-cost ratio of 2.41.

Material
TRY 5e2
Treatment
75 % N application in soil + nano urea foliar application twicee7
Outcome
BCRe7
Direction
similare7
Value
2.41e7
Setting
ADAC & RI, TNAU, Tiruchirappallie1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It is essential to study the effect of foliar application of nano urea on reduction of conventional urea, growth, grain productivity and net profit of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 123–278 · show in text ↑
e1

“A field experiment was carried out at ADAC & RI, TNAU, Tiruchirappalli during Rabi, 2023”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–368 · show in text ↑
e2

“Rice variety TRY 5 was used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–657 · show in text ↑
e7

“75 % N application in soil + nano urea foliar application twice (AT and PI stages) and thrice (AT, PI and flowering period) gave similar BCR of 2.41”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1393–1541 · show in text ↑

nanoparticle · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

202 papers: 189 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 189 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

198 papers more in this group

See all 202 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

511 papers: 402 positive, 109 negative or no effect

401 papers in the same direction as this paper · 101 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

application · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

691 papers: 645 positive, 46 negative or no effect

45 papers in the same direction as this paper · 645 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

687 papers more in this group

See all 691 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2,045 papers: 1,803 positive, 242 negative or no effect

1,802 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 in the opposite direction · 49 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,041 papers more in this group

See all 2,045 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.