Paper · 2025 · Scientific Reports

Chitosan pre- and post-treatment modulates molecular and physiological responses to salinity in Brassica Napus L

Sarvenaz Bigham Soostani; Monireh Ranjbar; Amir Memarian; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Salt stress affects plant growth and development to a great extent in establishing biochemical imbalances and inducing oxidative damage. The effort was undertaken to assess the relative effectiveness of chitosan pre- and post-treatments in relieving salt stress in Brassica napus L., a moderately salt-sensitive oilseed crop, with respect to the expression patterns of P5CS, PIP, and APX genes along with proline and protein accumulation. One factorial experiment was performed under controlled conditions, where the plants were exposed to varying NaCl concentrations (50, 100, 150, and 200 mM), following either the pre-treatment of chitosan (50 mg/L) or post-treatment of chitosan (50 and 100 mg/L). Gene expression analysis by means of qRT-PCR showed a significant (p < 0.05) upregulation under pre-treatment of P5CS and APX, thereby enhancing osmoprotection and antioxidant defense; however, under post-treatment, the response of P5CS and APX was only moderate. Post-treatment levels of proline and total protein were markedly higher as well. Interestingly, proline content increased by approximately 743% in pre-treated plants at 200 mM of NaCl compared to the control (p < 0.05), indicating enhanced stress tolerance. Besides, the plants subjected to pre-treatment were perfectly grown at 200 mM NaCl whereas those subjected to post-treatment were unable to survive at 150 mM. These findings reveal that the salt tolerance mechanism is better gained by chitosan pre-treatment due to osmotic adjustment enhancement and antioxidative mechanism. This study presents the potential of chitosan to be developed as a strategic biostimulant in promoting crop resistance to saline conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan pre-treatment significantly upregulated P5CS under salinity.

Taxon
Brassica napus L.Brassica napuse1
Treatment
pre-treatmente0
Gene
P5CSe0
Outcome
upregulatione0
Direction
upregulatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gene expression analysis by means of qRT-PCR showed a significant (p < 0.05) upregulation under pre-treatment of P5CS and APX”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–827 · show in text ↑
e1

“Brassica napus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 265–282 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan pre-treatment significantly upregulated APX under salinity.

Taxon
Brassica napus L.Brassica napuse1
Treatment
pre-treatmente0
Gene
APXe0
Outcome
upregulatione0
Direction
upregulatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gene expression analysis by means of qRT-PCR showed a significant (p < 0.05) upregulation under pre-treatment of P5CS and APX”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–827 · show in text ↑
e1

“Brassica napus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 265–282 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-treatment gave only moderate P5CS and APX responses.

Taxon
Brassica napus L.Brassica napuse1
Treatment
post-treatmente0
Outcome
response of P5CS and APXe0
Qualifier
only moderatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under post-treatment, the response of P5CS and APX was only moderate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 896–964 · show in text ↑
e1

“Brassica napus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 265–282 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-treatment produced markedly higher proline and total protein levels.

Taxon
Brassica napus L.Brassica napuse1
Treatment
Post-treatmente0
Outcome
levels of proline and total proteine0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Post-treatment levels of proline and total protein were markedly higher as well.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1046 · show in text ↑
e1

“Brassica napus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 265–282 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline increased approximately 743% in pre-treated plants at 200 mM NaCl relative to control.

Taxon
Brassica napus L.Brassica napuse1
Treatment
pre-treated plants at 200 mM of NaCle0
Outcome
proline contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
approximately 743%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“proline content increased by approximately 743% in pre-treated plants at 200 mM of NaCl compared to the control (p < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1184 · show in text ↑
e1

“Brassica napus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 265–282 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pre-treated plants grew at 200 mM NaCl.

Taxon
Brassica napus L.Brassica napuse1
Treatment
pre-treatmente0
Outcome
perfectly growne0
Qualifier
200 mM NaCle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plants subjected to pre-treatment were perfectly grown at 200 mM NaCl”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1306 · show in text ↑
e1

“Brassica napus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 265–282 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Post-treated plants failed to survive at 150 mM NaCl.

Taxon
Brassica napus L.Brassica napuse1
Treatment
post-treatmente0
Outcome
unable to survivee0
Qualifier
150 mMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“those subjected to post-treatment were unable to survive at 150 mM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1315–1381 · show in text ↑
e1

“Brassica napus L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 265–282 · show in text ↑

sodium chloride · physiology: osmolytes · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.