Paper · 2025 · International Journal of Environment Agriculture and Biotechnology

Effect of Irrigation and Moisture Conservation Practices on nutrient content and uptake of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

Mohit Kumar Sharma; S.K. Intodia; Arvind Verma; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In the rabi season of 2024-25, a field experiment entitled “Effect of Irrigation and Moisture Conservation Practices on nutrient content and uptake of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)” was conducted at the Agronomy Instructional Farm, Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Udaipur, Rajasthan. The experimental field comprised clay loam soil with medium fertility status. The experiment was laid out in a split-plot design, main plot treatments included four irrigation schedules: no irrigation (I0), irrigation at pre-flowering (I1), at pod formation (I2) and at both pre-flowering and pod formation stages (I3). The sub-plot treatments comprised four moisture conservation practices: control (M0), hydrogel @ 2.5 kg ha-1 (M1), dust mulch (M2) and maize stover mulch (M3) with three replications. The results revealed that irrigation at pre-flowering and pod formation stages (I3) significantly enhanced nutrient content and uptake. The highest nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium contents in seed (3.65%, 0.36% and 0.78%, respectively) and haulm (1.40%, 0.25% and 1.59%, respectively) were recorded under I3. Among moisture conservation practices, maize stover mulch (M3) and hydrogel (M1) significantly improved nutrient concentrations. Nutrient uptake by seed and haulm was also maximized under irrigation at pre-flowering and pod formation and maize stover mulch, with total nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium uptake reaching 132.59, 18.86 and 80.24 kg ha-1, respectively. These results highlight the synergistic role of optimal irrigation and effective moisture conservation in improving nutrient dynamics in chickpea.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at pre-flowering and pod formation significantly enhanced nutrient content and uptake.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
irrigation at pre-flowering and pod formation stages (I3)e0
Outcome
nutrient content and uptakee0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation at pre-flowering and pod formation stages (I3) significantly enhanced nutrient content and uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–924 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–180 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed nitrogen content under I3 reached 3.65%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Organ / stage
seede0
Treatment
I3e0
Outcome
nitrogene0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3.65%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium contents in seed (3.65%, 0.36% and 0.78%, respectively) and haulm (1.40%, 0.25% and 1.59%, respectively) were recorded under I3.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1101 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–180 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed phosphorus content under I3 reached 0.36%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Organ / stage
seede0
Treatment
I3e0
Outcome
phosphoruse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.36%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium contents in seed (3.65%, 0.36% and 0.78%, respectively) and haulm (1.40%, 0.25% and 1.59%, respectively) were recorded under I3.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1101 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–180 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed potassium content under I3 reached 0.78%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
I3e0
Outcome
potassium contents in seede0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.78%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium contents in seed (3.65%, 0.36% and 0.78%, respectively) and haulm (1.40%, 0.25% and 1.59%, respectively) were recorded under I3.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1101 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–180 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Haulm nitrogen content under I3 reached 1.40%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Organ / stage
haulme0
Treatment
I3e0
Outcome
nitrogene0
Value
1.40%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium contents in seed (3.65%, 0.36% and 0.78%, respectively) and haulm (1.40%, 0.25% and 1.59%, respectively) were recorded under I3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1100 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–180 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Haulm phosphorus content under I3 reached 0.25%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Organ / stage
haulme0
Treatment
I3e0
Outcome
phosphoruse0
Value
0.25%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium contents in seed (3.65%, 0.36% and 0.78%, respectively) and haulm (1.40%, 0.25% and 1.59%, respectively) were recorded under I3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1100 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–180 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Haulm potassium content under I3 reached 1.59%.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Organ / stage
haulme0
Treatment
I3e0
Outcome
potassium contents in seede0
Value
1.59%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium contents in seed (3.65%, 0.36% and 0.78%, respectively) and haulm (1.40%, 0.25% and 1.59%, respectively) were recorded under I3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1100 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–180 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize stover mulch significantly improved nutrient concentrations.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
maize stover mulch (M3)e0
Outcome
nutrient concentrationse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize stover mulch (M3) and hydrogel (M1) significantly improved nutrient concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1229 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–180 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hydrogel significantly improved nutrient concentrations.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
hydrogel (M1)e0
Outcome
nutrient concentrationse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize stover mulch (M3) and hydrogel (M1) significantly improved nutrient concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1229 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–180 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total nitrogen uptake under combined irrigation and maize stover mulch reached 132.59 kg ha-1.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Outcome
total nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium uptakee0
Direction
maximizede0
Value
132.59, 18.86 and 80.24 kg ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nutrient uptake by seed and haulm was also maximized under irrigation at pre-flowering and pod formation and maize stover mulch, with total nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium uptake reaching 132.59, 18.86 and 80.24 kg ha-1, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1468 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–180 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total phosphorus uptake under combined treatment reached 18.86 kg ha-1.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Outcome
phosphorus and potassium uptakee0
Value
18.86 and 80.24 kg ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium uptake reaching 132.59, 18.86 and 80.24 kg ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1365–1453 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–180 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total potassium uptake under combined treatment reached 80.24 kg ha-1.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume1
Outcome
potassium uptakee0
Value
80.24 kg ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium uptake reaching 132.59, 18.86 and 80.24 kg ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1365–1453 · show in text ↑
e1

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–180 · show in text ↑

mulching · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

irrigation · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

other · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.