Paper · 2025 · BMC Plant Biology

Mitigating Cd stress in alfalfa: the role of melatonin and nano-calcium oxide in enhancing photosynthesis and antioxidant defense

Maqsood Ul Hussan; Umer Mahmood; Saeedeh Zarbakhsh; et al.

18
claims
18
verbatim quotes
11
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Heavy metal contamination, particularly cadmium (Cd), is a significant threat to agricultural productivity and food security. Melatonin, as a key biostimulant, plant growth regulator and stress resistance hormone, along with nano-calcium oxide (nCaO), can enhance plant resilience to stress. However, few studies have investigated the combined effects of melatonin and nCaO in mitigating Cd stress in plants. This study examined the effects of the combined application of melatonin (100 µM) and nCaO (100 mg kg-1) on alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) seedlings. Under Cd stress, alfalfa seedlings exhibited a 43% reduction in shoot length, 50% in root length, and 60% in chlorophyll content, while increased MDA, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and O2•– accumulation. However, the combined application of melatonin and nCaO significantly alleviated Cd toxicity, enhancing shoot and root growth by 46% and 49%, respectively. Photosynthetic efficiency improved by 70%, while chlorophyll content and Fv/Fm ratio increased by 68% and 81%, respectively. This treatment also reduced Cd accumulation in roots and shoots by 47% and 75%, while increasing calcium uptake by 84% in roots and 63% in shoots. Antioxidant enzyme activities (SOD, POD, CAT, and APX) were upregulated by 59%, 42%, 62%, and 49%, respectively, mitigating oxidative damage. The effect of combined treatment on ultrastructural analysis revealed restored chloroplast integrity and stomatal functionality under Cd stress. The combined application of melatonin + nano calcium oxide shows great promise for ecologically acceptable alleviation of Cd stress in alfalfa by lowering its absorption.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium stress reduced alfalfa shoot length by 43%.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
Cd stresse0
Outcome
shoot lengthe0
Direction
reductione0
Value
43%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under Cd stress, alfalfa seedlings exhibited a 43% reduction in shoot length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–633 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium stress reduced alfalfa root length by 50%.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
Cd stresse0
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
reductione0
Value
50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under Cd stress, alfalfa seedlings exhibited a 43% reduction in shoot length, 50% in root length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–653 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium stress reduced chlorophyll content by 60%.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
Cd stresse0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
reductione0
Value
60%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under Cd stress, alfalfa seedlings exhibited a 43% reduction in shoot length, 50% in root length, and 60% in chlorophyll content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–685 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium stress increased MDA, hydrogen peroxide and O2•– accumulation.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae0
Treatment
Cd stresse0
Outcome
MDA, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and O2•– accumulatione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under Cd stress, alfalfa seedlings exhibited a 43% reduction in shoot length, 50% in root length, and 60% in chlorophyll content, while increased MDA, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and O2•– accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–754 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined melatonin and nCaO increased shoot growth by 46% under cadmium stress.

Treatment
combined application of melatonin and nCaOe0
Outcome
shoot and root growthe0
Direction
enhancinge0
Value
46%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“combined application of melatonin and nCaO significantly alleviated Cd toxicity, enhancing shoot and root growth by 46% and 49%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–910 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined melatonin and nCaO increased root growth by 49% under cadmium stress.

Treatment
combined application of melatonin and nCaOe0
Outcome
root growthe0
Direction
enhancinge0
Value
49%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“combined application of melatonin and nCaO significantly alleviated Cd toxicity, enhancing shoot and root growth by 46% and 49%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–910 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic efficiency improved by 70% with combined treatment.

Outcome
Photosynthetic efficiencye0
Direction
improvede0
Value
70%e0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Photosynthetic efficiency improved by 70%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–953 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll content increased by 68% with combined treatment.

Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
68%e0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“chlorophyll content and Fv/Fm ratio increased by 68% and 81%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1035 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fv/Fm ratio increased by 81% with combined treatment.

Outcome
Fv/Fm ratioe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
81%e0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“chlorophyll content and Fv/Fm ratio increased by 68% and 81%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1035 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment reduced root cadmium accumulation by 47%.

Treatment
This treatmente0
Outcome
Cd accumulation in rootse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
47%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment also reduced Cd accumulation in roots and shoots by 47% and 75%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment reduced shoot cadmium accumulation by 75%.

Treatment
This treatmente0
Outcome
Cd accumulation in roots and shootse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
75%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment also reduced Cd accumulation in roots and shoots by 47% and 75%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment increased calcium uptake in roots by 84%.

Organ / stage
rootse0
Outcome
calcium uptakee0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
84%e0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“increasing calcium uptake by 84% in roots and 63% in shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1182 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment increased calcium uptake in shoots by 63%.

Organ / stage
shootse0
Outcome
calcium uptakee0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
63%e0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“increasing calcium uptake by 84% in roots and 63% in shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1182 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SOD activity rose by 59% with combined treatment.

Outcome
Antioxidant enzyme activitiese0
Direction
upregulatede0
Value
59%e0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Antioxidant enzyme activities (SOD, POD, CAT, and APX) were upregulated by 59%, 42%, 62%, and 49%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1295 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

POD activity rose by 42% with combined treatment.

Outcome
Antioxidant enzyme activitiese0
Direction
upregulatede0
Value
42%e0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Antioxidant enzyme activities (SOD, POD, CAT, and APX) were upregulated by 59%, 42%, 62%, and 49%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1295 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CAT activity rose by 62% with combined treatment.

Outcome
Antioxidant enzyme activitiese0
Direction
upregulatede0
Value
62%e0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Antioxidant enzyme activities (SOD, POD, CAT, and APX) were upregulated by 59%, 42%, 62%, and 49%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1295 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

APX activity rose by 49% with combined treatment.

Outcome
Antioxidant enzyme activitiese0
Direction
upregulatede0
Value
49%e0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Antioxidant enzyme activities (SOD, POD, CAT, and APX) were upregulated by 59%, 42%, 62%, and 49%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1295 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined treatment restored chloroplast integrity and stomatal functionality under cadmium stress.

Treatment
combined treatmente0
Outcome
chloroplast integrity and stomatal functionalitye0
Direction
restorede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“combined treatment on ultrastructural analysis revealed restored chloroplast integrity and stomatal functionality under Cd stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1340–1469 · show in text ↑

cadmium atom · physiology: pigments · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results differ

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

melatonin · growth · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results differ

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

cadmium atom · growth · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results differ

19 papers: 2 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

oxide · growth · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

cadmium atom · physiology: oxidative · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 1 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

heavy metal · physiology: pigments · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

heavy metal · growth · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 2 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.