Paper · 2025 · International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research

Effect of inorganic & organic fertilizers on the growth & yield of garlic (Allium sativum l.) under chironji (Buchanania lanzan spreng.) based agroforestry system

Tanmaya Sekhar Nayak; AJ Raj

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the effects of inorganic and organic fertilizer on the growth (plant height, number of leaves, leaf length) yield (bulb weight, bulb diameter, yield per plot, yield per ha) and economics (cost of cultivation, cost of treatments, B: C ratio). Study Design: The study was conducted over a period of 7 months and included two plots one under open condition while the other under Chironji based Agroforestry System. Place and Duration of Study: The study was conducted at the Research and Nursery of the College of Forestry, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology & Sciences, Prayagraj during the period of October to April 2024-25. Methodology: In both the sites RBD (Randomized Block Design) was followed, consisting of 12 treatments and 3 replication, with a net plot area of (3m*3m=9m2) and a net experimental area of (36m*9m=324m2) each. Comparisons were made on the basis of treatments as well as under open & Chironji based Agroforestry System. Results: Treatment T10 (50% RDF+25% Neem Cake+ 25% Vermicompost) showed the best results in growth and yield in both Open and Under Chironji based Agroforestry System, closely followed by the treatment T1 (100%RDF). Although results under open condition were higher in every case, with time the overall income will be higher under Chironji based Agroforestry System. Conclusion: The study highlights the effects of combining inorganic fertilizer with organic fertilizer for a more sustainable, efficient, economically productive outcomes. The treatments used in the study doesn’t solely depends on shifting towards organic fertilizer nor does it depends completely on chemical fertilizers but combines them both for the preservation of the ecosystem as well as reducing the dependency on chemical fertilizer.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T10 produced the best growth in both open and Chironji agroforestry settings.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
T10 (50% RDF+25% Neem Cake+ 25% Vermicompost)e0
Interactor
Chironjie0other
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
beste0
Comparator
T1 (100%RDF)e0
Setting
both Open and Under Chironji based Agroforestry Systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment T10 (50% RDF+25% Neem Cake+ 25% Vermicompost) showed the best results in growth and yield in both Open and Under Chironji based Agroforestry System, closely followed by the treatment T1 (100%RDF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1195 · show in text ↑
t0

“garlic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T10 produced the best yield in both settings, followed by T1.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
T10 (50% RDF+25% Neem Cake+ 25% Vermicompost)e0
Interactor
Chironjie0other
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
beste0
Comparator
T1 (100%RDF)e0
Setting
both Open and Under Chironji based Agroforestry Systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment T10 (50% RDF+25% Neem Cake+ 25% Vermicompost) showed the best results in growth and yield in both Open and Under Chironji based Agroforestry System, closely followed by the treatment T1 (100%RDF)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1195 · show in text ↑
t0

“garlic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Open conditions yielded higher results than Chironji agroforestry in every case.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
open conditione0
Outcome
resultse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“results under open condition were higher in every case”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1260 · show in text ↑
t0

“garlic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–73 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositiveprojected

Claim · model-written summary

The authors expect overall income to become higher under Chironji agroforestry over time.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Outcome
overall incomee0
Direction
highere0
Setting
Chironji based Agroforestry Systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with time the overall income will be higher under Chironji based Agroforestry System”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1346 · show in text ↑
t0

“garlic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–73 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Allium sativum (garlic)Results differ

166 papers: 155 positive, 11 negative or no effect

154 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

162 papers more in this group

See all 166 papers →

botanical · growth · Allium sativum (garlic)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 19 positive, 2 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

botanical · yield · Allium sativum (garlic)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 23 positive, 2 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

fertilization · growth · Allium sativum (garlic)Positive and negative results

99 papers: 93 positive, 6 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

95 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.