Paper · 2025 · International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research

Effect of microbial consortia on vegetative growth of gladiolus (cv. Rose supreme) under Tarai region of Uttarakhand

Aakash Deep Kamboj; BD Bhuj; Ranjan K Srivastava; et al.

5
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present experiment entitled Effect of microbial consortia on vegetative growth of gladiolus (cv. Rose supreme) under Tarai region of Uttarakhand was carried out at Modern Floriculture Centre, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Udham Singh Nagar, Uttarakhand during 2022-23 and 2023-24. Experiment was conducted in Factorial Randomized Block Design with an additional treatment having three replications. Four different concentrations of microbial consortia, viz., D1 (3 mL L-1), D2 (6 mL L-1), D3 (9 mL L-1) and D4 (12 mL L-1) of water, applied through three distinct methods viz., M1 (Dipping of corms in consortia), M2 (Application by mixing with vermicompost) and M3 (Application of consortia through spray). During 2022-23 and 2023-24, among different methods application of mixing microbial consortia with vermicompost (M2) was recorded superior with respect to different vegetative parameters like 50 per cent sprouting, plant height at 30 and 60 days, number of leaves at 30 and 60 days, length of longest leaf at 60 days, width of longest leaf at 60 days and number of tillers per corm at vegetative stage compared to other methods. Among different doses, higher doses of microbial consortia showed significantly better performance than lower doses.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixing microbial consortia with vermicompost was superior to other methods for 50 percent sprouting.

Taxon
gladiolusGladiolust0
Material
cv. Rose supremet0
Treatment
mixing microbial consortia with vermicompost (M2)e0
Outcome
50 per cent sproutinge0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
other methodse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of mixing microbial consortia with vermicompost (M2) was recorded superior with respect to different vegetative parameters like 50 per cent sprouting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–967 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to other methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1181 · show in text ↑
t0

“gladiolus (cv. Rose supreme)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixing microbial consortia with vermicompost was superior to other methods for plant height at 30 and 60 days.

Taxon
gladiolusGladiolust0
Material
cv. Rose supremet0
Treatment
mixing microbial consortia with vermicompost (M2)e0
Outcome
plant height at 30 and 60 dayse0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
other methodse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of mixing microbial consortia with vermicompost (M2) was recorded superior with respect to different vegetative parameters like 50 per cent sprouting, plant height at 30 and 60 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–999 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to other methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1181 · show in text ↑
t0

“gladiolus (cv. Rose supreme)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixing microbial consortia with vermicompost was superior for leaf number, leaf length and leaf width.

Taxon
gladiolusGladiolust0
Material
cv. Rose supremet0
Treatment
mixing microbial consortia with vermicompost (M2)e0
Outcome
number of leaves at 30 and 60 days, length of longest leaf at 60 days, width of longest leaf at 60 dayse0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
other methodse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of mixing microbial consortia with vermicompost (M2) was recorded superior with respect to different vegetative parameters like 50 per cent sprouting, plant height at 30 and 60 days, number of leaves at 30 and 60 days, length of longest leaf at 60 days, width of longest leaf at 60 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–1104 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to other methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1181 · show in text ↑
t0

“gladiolus (cv. Rose supreme)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mixing microbial consortia with vermicompost was superior for tillers per corm.

Taxon
gladiolusGladiolust0
Material
cv. Rose supremet0
Treatment
mixing microbial consortia with vermicompost (M2)e0
Outcome
number of tillers per corm at vegetative stagee0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
other methodse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of mixing microbial consortia with vermicompost (M2) was recorded superior with respect to different vegetative parameters like 50 per cent sprouting, plant height at 30 and 60 days, number of leaves at 30 and 60 days, length of longest leaf at 60 days, width of longest leaf at 60 days and number of tillers per corm at vegetative stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–1155 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared to other methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1181 · show in text ↑
t0

“gladiolus (cv. Rose supreme)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher microbial consortia doses performed significantly better than lower doses.

Taxon
gladiolusGladiolust0
Treatment
higher doses of microbial consortiae0
Outcome
better performancee0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
lower dosese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gladiolus
Gladiolus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Gere72 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher doses of microbial consortia showed significantly better performance than lower doses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1298 · show in text ↑
t0

“gladiolus (cv. Rose supreme)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–82 · show in text ↑

inoculation · quality: postharvest · GladiolusPositive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

inoculation · growth · GladiolusPositive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

fertilization · quality: postharvest · GladiolusPositive and negative results

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

fertilization · growth · GladiolusPositive and negative results

50 papers: 48 positive, 2 negative or no effect

47 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

fertilization · yield · GladiolusPositive and negative results

53 papers: 52 positive, 1 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

inoculation · yield · GladiolusResults agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.