Paper · 2025 · Agronomy

Potassium and Magnesium Balance the Effect of Nitrogen on the Yield and Quality of Sugar Beet

Przemysław Barłóg; Witold Grzebisz

8
claims
19
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The yield-enhancing effect of nitrogen (N) in sugar beets depends on the appropriate balance of other nutrients, including potassium (K) and magnesium (Mg). To determine the effects of these nutrients on beet yield (BY), quality parameters, white sugar yield (WSY), and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) indices, a three-year field study was conducted in western Poland. Eight different fertilization treatments with potassium salt (PS), Korn-Kali (KK), and magnesium sulfate (Mg) were tested, K0, K1 (PS), K2 (PS), K2 (PS) + Mg, K1 (KK), K2 (KK), K2 (KK) + Mg, K2 (KK) + Mg + FF, where 0, 1, and 2 are the K rates, respectively, for 0, 83, and 163 kg K ha−1, and FF denotes foliar fertilization with magnesium sulfate. Potassium fertilization, both in the form of PS and KK, along with additional application of magnesium sulfate, positively affected BY and WSY. However, the response to fertilization depended strongly on seasonal factors, such as weather and soil conditions. Compared to the treatment without potassium (K0), the average BY increased by 6.5–9.1%, and the WSY by 4.6–9.0%. Mineral fertilization had little effect on taproot quality parameters, including sucrose content. The exception was the concentration of α-amino-N, which significantly decreased with the application of K fertilizers. However, changes in α-amino-N content were not significantly related to WSY levels because this characteristic primarily depended on BY each year, and applying K and Mg to the soil improves NUE indices.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium and magnesium sulfate fertilization increased beet yield by 6.5–9.1% relative to no potassium.

Treatment
Potassium fertilizatione0
Outcome
BYe1
Direction
increasede1
Value
6.5–9.1%e1
Comparator
treatment without potassium (K0)e1

Not reportedSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Potassium fertilization, both in the form of PS and KK, along with additional application of magnesium sulfate, positively affected BY and WSY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–858 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared to the treatment without potassium (K0), the average BY increased by 6.5–9.1%, and the WSY by 4.6–9.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1086 · show in text ↑
e2

“in sugar beets depends on the appropriate balance of other nutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 43–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium and magnesium sulfate fertilization increased white sugar yield by 4.6–9.0% relative to no potassium.

Treatment
Potassium fertilizatione0
Outcome
WSYe1
Direction
increasede1
Value
4.6–9.0%e1
Comparator
treatment without potassium (K0)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Potassium fertilization, both in the form of PS and KK, along with additional application of magnesium sulfate, positively affected BY and WSY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–858 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared to the treatment without potassium (K0), the average BY increased by 6.5–9.1%, and the WSY by 4.6–9.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1086 · show in text ↑
e2

“in sugar beets depends on the appropriate balance of other nutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 43–111 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization responses depended strongly on weather and soil conditions.

Outcome
response to fertilizatione0
Setting
weather and soil conditionse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the response to fertilization depended strongly on seasonal factors, such as weather and soil conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–973 · show in text ↑
e1

“in sugar beets depends on the appropriate balance of other nutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 43–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral fertilization had little effect on taproot quality parameters including sucrose content.

Organ / stage
taproote0
Treatment
Mineral fertilizatione0
Outcome
taproot quality parameters, including sucrose contente0
Direction
little effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mineral fertilization had little effect on taproot quality parameters, including sucrose content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1184 · show in text ↑
e1

“in sugar beets depends on the appropriate balance of other nutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 43–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium fertilizers significantly decreased α-amino-N concentration.

Treatment
application of K fertilizerse0
Outcome
concentration of α-amino-Ne0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the concentration of α-amino-N, which significantly decreased with the application of K fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1204–1303 · show in text ↑
e1

“in sugar beets depends on the appropriate balance of other nutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 43–111 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Changes in α-amino-N content were not significantly related to white sugar yield.

Compound
α-amino-Ne0
Outcome
WSY levelse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“changes in α-amino-N content were not significantly related to WSY levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1314–1387 · show in text ↑
e1

“in sugar beets depends on the appropriate balance of other nutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 43–111 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

White sugar yield depended primarily on beet yield each year.

Outcome
WSY levelse1
Qualifier
primarily depended on BY each yeare0
Comparator
BYe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this characteristic primarily depended on BY each year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1396–1450 · show in text ↑
e1

“changes in α-amino-N content were not significantly related to WSY levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1314–1387 · show in text ↑
e2

“in sugar beets depends on the appropriate balance of other nutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 43–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying potassium and magnesium to soil improved nitrogen use efficiency indices.

Treatment
applying K and Mg to the soile0
Outcome
NUE indicese0
Direction
improvese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applying K and Mg to the soil improves NUE indices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1456–1506 · show in text ↑
e1

“in sugar beets depends on the appropriate balance of other nutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 43–111 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

105 papers: 88 positive, 17 negative or no effect

87 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

101 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

68 papers: 45 positive, 23 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

64 papers more in this group

See all 68 papers →

fertilization · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

267 papers: 237 positive, 30 negative or no effect

236 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

263 papers more in this group

See all 267 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.