Paper · 2025 · Horticulture Research Journal

The Evaluation of Grafting with Some Different Rootstocks on The Yield, Berry Characteristics and Bioactive Compounds in “Starlight” Grape

Hitham M.A. Mohamed; Abdelgawad S.S. Ahmed

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In the current study, we endeavored to assess the impact of grafting with three grape rootstocks namely (Freedom, Richter 110R and SO4) on yield, quality and accumulation of bioactive compounds in "Starlight “grape cultivar. We conducted the experiment over the course of the principal growing seasons in 2024 and 2025. Four treatments as follow (Control (un-grafted), grafted on Freedom rootstock, grafted on Richter 110R rootstock, and grafted on SO4 rootstock) were applied on 7-year-old vines, located at a private farm in Menia Governorate. Our findings indicated that grafting 'Starlight' grapevine cultivars onto various rootstocks generally enhanced their growth, fruit yield, quality and accumulation of bioactive compounds (Proline, Total phenolics and Tannins). Specifically, results have shown that vines grafted onto Freedom rootstock can lead to higher yields and larger vine vigor. Besides, it significantly boosts shoot growth and leaf area, improve berry size and weight, surpassing other rootstocks and those grown from their own roots. In contrast to the minimal growth observed with SO4 rootstock. Chemically, 'Starlight' vines grafted onto Freedom rootstock showcased the highest levels of Total Soluble Solids (TSS%) and TSS/acid ratio, whereas, it was the lowest in acidity percentage in the juice of berries, contributing to sweeter grapes with better coloration and anthocyanin content. Additionally, Richter 110R rootstock led to a higher accumulation of bioactive compounds compared to SO₄ and Freedom, with SO₄ outperforming Freedom in Proline and Tannins.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting onto various rootstocks generally enhanced growth, fruit yield and quality.

Taxon
Grapet0
Material
'Starlight'e0
Treatment
graftinge0
Outcome
growth, fruit yield, qualitye0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“grafting 'Starlight' grapevine cultivars onto various rootstocks generally enhanced their growth, fruit yield, quality and accumulation of bioactive compounds (Proline, Total phenolics and Tannins).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–772 · show in text ↑
t0

““Starlight” Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting enhanced accumulation of proline, total phenolics and tannins.

Taxon
Grapet0
Material
'Starlight'e0
Treatment
graftinge0
Outcome
accumulation of bioactive compounds (Proline, Total phenolics and Tannins)e0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“grafting 'Starlight' grapevine cultivars onto various rootstocks generally enhanced their growth, fruit yield, quality and accumulation of bioactive compounds (Proline, Total phenolics and Tannins).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–772 · show in text ↑
t0

““Starlight” Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Freedom rootstock gave higher yields and vine vigor.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
grafted onto Freedom rootstocke0
Outcome
yields and larger vine vigore0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“vines grafted onto Freedom rootstock can lead to higher yields and larger vine vigor.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–896 · show in text ↑
t0

““Starlight” Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–138 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SO4 rootstock produced minimal vine growth.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
SO4 rootstocke0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
minimale0

Verbatim

e0

“minimal growth observed with SO4 rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1116 · show in text ↑
t0

““Starlight” Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Freedom rootstock produced the highest total soluble solids and TSS to acid ratio.

Taxon
Grapet0
Material
'Starlight'e0
Treatment
grafted onto Freedom rootstocke0
Outcome
Total Soluble Solids (TSS%) and TSS/acid ratioe0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“'Starlight' vines grafted onto Freedom rootstock showcased the highest levels of Total Soluble Solids (TSS%) and TSS/acid ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1257 · show in text ↑
t0

““Starlight” Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Freedom rootstock yielded the lowest berry juice acidity.

Taxon
Grapet0
Material
'Starlight'e0
Treatment
grafted onto Freedom rootstocke0
Outcome
acidity percentage in the juice of berriese0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“'Starlight' vines grafted onto Freedom rootstock showcased the highest levels of Total Soluble Solids (TSS%) and TSS/acid ratio, whereas, it was the lowest in acidity percentage in the juice of berries”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1331 · show in text ↑
t0

““Starlight” Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–138 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Freedom rootstock was associated with sweeter, better colored grapes and anthocyanin content.

Taxon
grapese0
Treatment
grafted onto Freedom rootstocke1
Outcome
sweeter grapes with better coloration and anthocyanin contente0
Direction
bettere0

Verbatim

e0

“contributing to sweeter grapes with better coloration and anthocyanin content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1333–1410 · show in text ↑
e1

“'Starlight' vines grafted onto Freedom rootstock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1178 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Richter 110R led to higher bioactive compound accumulation than SO4 and Freedom.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
Richter 110R rootstocke0
Outcome
accumulation of bioactive compoundse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
SO₄ and Freedome0

Verbatim

e0

“Richter 110R rootstock led to a higher accumulation of bioactive compounds compared to SO₄ and Freedom”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1426–1528 · show in text ↑
t0

““Starlight” Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SO4 exceeded Freedom in proline and tannins.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
SO₄e0
Outcome
Proline and Tanninse0
Direction
outperforminge0
Comparator
Freedome0

Verbatim

e0

“SO₄ outperforming Freedom in Proline and Tannins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1535–1583 · show in text ↑
t0

““Starlight” Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–138 · show in text ↑

grafting · yield · VitisResults differ

28 papers: 21 positive, 7 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

grafting · quality: general · VitisPositive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

grafting · quality: sugar starch · VitisPositive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

grafting · quality: phytochemicals · VitisPositive and negative results

12 papers: 8 positive, 4 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

grafting · physiology: osmolytes · VitisResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.