Paper · 2025 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Effects of N-K management strategies on nutrient uptake efficiency, lodging resistance, and yield in machine-transplanted rice

Zhixin Li; Mingming Hu; Tao Liu; et al.

19
claims
43
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Introduction: Imbalanced N-K ratios reduce nutrient uptake efficiency while increasing lodging susceptibility, thereby destabilizing yield potential. Optimizing N-K ratios is therefore crucial for improving nutrient efficiency, lodging resistance, and yield potential. Methods: ¹ for N and K to investigate N-K interactions on rice growth and nutrient utilization. Results: N-K interactions significantly affected dry matter accumulation, nutrient uptake, lodging resistance, and yield. Split potassium application (K2) increased grain yield by 3.06% compared with basal-only application (K1), by increasing productive panicles, spikelets per panicle, total spikelets, and seed-setting rate. K2 enhanced post-heading dry matter translocation and improved N-K uptake, elevating panicle N and K accumulation by 5.01% and 13.70%, respectively. K2 also significantly improved lodging resistance. Under K2, the N3 treatment further increased yield by enhancing the number of effective panicles, grains per panicle, and total spikelets, with average yield increases of 12.17% and 4.77% compared with N1 and N2, respectively. Post-heading dry matter accumulation, remobilization ratio, and contribution rate in N3 were higher than in N1 and N2, with two-year average increases of 25.54%, 5.37%, and 7.42% compared with N1, and 12.68%, 2.76%, and 2.57% compared with N2. N3 also promoted the translocation of N and K. Compared with N1 and N2, N3 increased whole-plant N translocation and N transferred to the panicle by 38.09% and 27.45%, and by 14.53% and 12.45%, respectively; whole-plant K translocation and K transferred to the panicle increased by 11.46% and 28.26%, and by 13.35% and 18.35%, respectively. Additionally, N3 improved lodging resistance by thickening internodes and stem-sheath walls. The lodging index was significantly negatively correlated with N and K accumulation in stem-sheaths. Discussion: Overall, the K2N3 combination enhances post-heading assimilate allocation and nutrient translocation in machine-transplanted rice, strengthens stem mechanical properties, optimizes panicle traits, and ultimately achieves stable and high yields.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

N-K interactions significantly affected dry matter accumulation, nutrient uptake, lodging resistance and yield.

Treatment
N-K interactionse0
Outcome
dry matter accumulation, nutrient uptake, lodging resistance, and yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“N-K interactions significantly affected dry matter accumulation, nutrient uptake, lodging resistance, and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–485 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Split potassium increased grain yield by 3.06% versus basal-only application.

Treatment
Split potassium application (K2)e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
3.06%e0
Comparator
basal-only application (K1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“Split potassium application (K2) increased grain yield by 3.06% compared with basal-only application (K1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–592 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Split potassium increased productive panicles, spikelets per panicle, total spikelets and seed setting rate.

Treatment
Split potassium application (K2)e1
Outcome
productive panicles, spikelets per panicle, total spikelets, and seed-setting ratee0
Direction
increasinge0
Comparator
basal-only application (K1)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“by increasing productive panicles, spikelets per panicle, total spikelets, and seed-setting rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–690 · show in text ↑
e1

“Split potassium application (K2) increased grain yield by 3.06% compared with basal-only application (K1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–592 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K2 enhanced post-heading dry matter translocation and N-K uptake.

Treatment
K2e0
Outcome
post-heading dry matter translocation and improved N-K uptakee0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“K2 enhanced post-heading dry matter translocation and improved N-K uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–765 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K2 raised panicle nitrogen accumulation by 5.01%.

Treatment
K2e1
Outcome
panicle Ne0
Direction
elevatinge0
Value
5.01%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“elevating panicle N and K accumulation by 5.01% and 13.70%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–839 · show in text ↑
e1

“K2 enhanced post-heading dry matter translocation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–741 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K2 raised panicle potassium accumulation by 13.70%.

Treatment
K2e1
Outcome
panicle N and K accumulatione0
Direction
elevatinge0
Value
13.70%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“elevating panicle N and K accumulation by 5.01% and 13.70%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–839 · show in text ↑
e1

“K2 enhanced post-heading dry matter translocation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–741 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

K2 significantly improved lodging resistance.

Treatment
K2e0
Outcome
lodging resistancee0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“K2 also significantly improved lodging resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–890 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under K2, N3 increased yield by 12.17% versus N1.

Treatment
N3 treatmente0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
12.17%e0
Qualifier
Under K2e0
Comparator
N1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“Under K2, the N3 treatment further increased yield by enhancing the number of effective panicles, grains per panicle, and total spikelets, with average yield increases of 12.17% and 4.77% compared with N1 and N2, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under K2, N3 increased yield by 4.77% versus N2.

Treatment
N3 treatmente0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
4.77%e0
Qualifier
Under K2e0
Comparator
N2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“Under K2, the N3 treatment further increased yield by enhancing the number of effective panicles, grains per panicle, and total spikelets, with average yield increases of 12.17% and 4.77% compared with N1 and N2, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N3 increased effective panicles, grains per panicle and total spikelets.

Treatment
N3 treatmente0
Outcome
number of effective panicles, grains per panicle, and total spikeletse0
Direction
enhancinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“N3 treatment further increased yield by enhancing the number of effective panicles, grains per panicle, and total spikelets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1029 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N3 increased post-heading dry matter accumulation by 25.54% versus N1 and 12.68% versus N2.

Treatment
N3e0
Outcome
Post-heading dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
highere0
Value
25.54%e0
Comparator
N1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“Post-heading dry matter accumulation, remobilization ratio, and contribution rate in N3 were higher than in N1 and N2, with two-year average increases of 25.54%, 5.37%, and 7.42% compared with N1, and 12.68%, 2.76%, and 2.57% compared with N2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1361 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N3 increased remobilization ratio by 5.37% versus N1 and 2.76% versus N2.

Treatment
N3e0
Outcome
remobilization ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Value
5.37%e0
Comparator
N1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“Post-heading dry matter accumulation, remobilization ratio, and contribution rate in N3 were higher than in N1 and N2, with two-year average increases of 25.54%, 5.37%, and 7.42% compared with N1, and 12.68%, 2.76%, and 2.57% compared with N2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1361 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N3 increased post-heading contribution rate by 7.42% versus N1 and 2.57% versus N2.

Treatment
N3e0
Outcome
contribution ratee0
Direction
highere0
Value
7.42%e0
Comparator
N1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“Post-heading dry matter accumulation, remobilization ratio, and contribution rate in N3 were higher than in N1 and N2, with two-year average increases of 25.54%, 5.37%, and 7.42% compared with N1, and 12.68%, 2.76%, and 2.57% compared with N2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1361 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N3 increased whole plant nitrogen translocation by 38.09% versus N1 and 14.53% versus N2.

Treatment
N3e0
Outcome
whole-plant N translocatione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
38.09%e0
Comparator
N1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“Compared with N1 and N2, N3 increased whole-plant N translocation and N transferred to the panicle by 38.09% and 27.45%, and by 14.53% and 12.45%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1410–1569 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N3 increased nitrogen transferred to the panicle by 27.45% versus N1 and 12.45% versus N2.

Treatment
N3e0
Outcome
N transferred to the paniclee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
27.45%e0
Comparator
N1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“Compared with N1 and N2, N3 increased whole-plant N translocation and N transferred to the panicle by 38.09% and 27.45%, and by 14.53% and 12.45%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1410–1569 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N3 increased whole plant potassium translocation by 11.46% versus N1 and 13.35% versus N2.

Treatment
N3e1
Outcome
whole-plant K translocatione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
11.46%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“whole-plant K translocation and K transferred to the panicle increased by 11.46% and 28.26%, and by 13.35% and 18.35%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1571–1702 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with N1 and N2, N3 increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1410–1447 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N3 increased potassium transferred to panicles by 28.26% versus N1 and 18.35% versus N2.

Treatment
N3e1
Outcome
K transferred to the paniclee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
28.26%e0
Comparator
N1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“whole-plant K translocation and K transferred to the panicle increased by 11.46% and 28.26%, and by 13.35% and 18.35%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1571–1702 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with N1 and N2, N3 increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1410–1447 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N3 improved lodging resistance by thickening internodes and stem-sheath walls.

Organ / stage
internodes and stem-sheath wallse0
Treatment
N3e0
Outcome
lodging resistancee0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“N3 improved lodging resistance by thickening internodes and stem-sheath walls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1718–1795 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lodging index was significantly negatively correlated with stem sheath nitrogen and potassium accumulation.

Organ / stage
stem-sheathse0
Outcome
lodging indexe0
Direction
negatively correlatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–126 · show in text ↑
e0

“The lodging index was significantly negatively correlated with N and K accumulation in stem-sheaths”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1797–1896 · show in text ↑

potassium · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

383 papers: 344 positive, 39 negative or no effect

343 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

379 papers more in this group

See all 383 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.