Paper · 2024 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Effect of split application of potassium on nutrient recovery efficiency, soil nutrient balance, and system productivity under rice-wheat cropping system (RWCS)

S. Vijayakumar; Dinesh Kumar; Kulasekaran Ramesh; et al.

12
claims
19
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Improving nutrient use efficiency and system productivity with a positive nutrient balance in rice-wheat cropping system (RWCS) is vital for long-term food security. Two-year field trials were conducted with the objective of computing the effect of different rates, time, method, and source of potassium (K) fertilization on nutrient recovery efficiency, nutrient balance, and system productivity in a dry direct-seeded RWCS with eight treatments. The two-split (half basal and half at panicle initiation) application of 60 kg K2O/ha resulted in 37.5% and 19.2% increase in recovery efficiency of K in rice and wheat, respectively over basal application of 60 kg K2O/ha. Besides, the split-application of K increased the nitrogen recovery efficiency in rice and wheat by 11.2% and 10.8%, respectively. Similarly, the phosphorus recovery efficiency was increased by 3.6% and 7.4% in rice and wheat, respectively. The split application of 60 kg K2O/ha also increased the K harvest index (% of the total K absorbed is transferred to grain) by 0.7% and 2.7% in rice and wheat, respectively over applying entire K at basal. Similarly, the system productivity (11.26 t/ha) was increased by 8% over applying entire K at basal. In the absence of top-dressing of K (30 kg/ha), two foliar-sprays of 2.5% K provide equal benefits of top dressing. Application of 90 kg K2O/ha lowered the K negative balance (−99 kg/ha/year) considerably compared to two-split application of 60 kg K2O/ha (−152.5 kg/ha/year). Thus, optimization of K fertilization in RWCS will increase the system productivity, nutrient use efficiency, and sustainability.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two-split K application (60 kg K2O/ha) increased K recovery efficiency in rice by 37.5% over basal application.

Treatment
two-split (half basal and half at panicle initiation) application of 60 kg K2O/hae0
Outcome
recovery efficiency of Ke0
Direction
increasee0
Value
37.5%e0
Comparator
basal application of 60 kg K2O/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The two-split (half basal and half at panicle initiation) application of 60 kg K2O/ha resulted in 37.5% and 19.2% increase in recovery efficiency of K in rice and wheat, respectively over basal application of 60 kg K2O/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–669 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two-split K application (60 kg K2O/ha) increased K recovery efficiency in wheat by 19.2% over basal application.

Treatment
two-split (half basal and half at panicle initiation) application of 60 kg K2O/hae0
Outcome
recovery efficiency of Ke0
Direction
increasee0
Value
19.2%e0
Comparator
basal application of 60 kg K2O/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The two-split (half basal and half at panicle initiation) application of 60 kg K2O/ha resulted in 37.5% and 19.2% increase in recovery efficiency of K in rice and wheat, respectively over basal application of 60 kg K2O/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–669 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Split application of K increased nitrogen recovery efficiency in rice by 11.2%.

Treatment
split-application of Ke0
Outcome
nitrogen recovery efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
11.2%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the split-application of K increased the nitrogen recovery efficiency in rice and wheat by 11.2% and 10.8%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–800 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Split application of K increased nitrogen recovery efficiency in wheat by 10.8%.

Treatment
split-application of Ke0
Outcome
nitrogen recovery efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the split-application of K increased the nitrogen recovery efficiency in rice and wheat by 11.2% and 10.8%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–800 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus recovery efficiency in rice was increased by 3.6% under split K application.

Treatment
split-application of Ke0
Outcome
phosphorus recovery efficiencye1
Direction
increasede1
Value
3.6%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the split-application of K increased the nitrogen recovery efficiency in rice and wheat by 11.2% and 10.8%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–800 · show in text ↑
e1

“the phosphorus recovery efficiency was increased by 3.6% and 7.4% in rice and wheat, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–910 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus recovery efficiency in wheat was increased by 7.4% under split K application.

Treatment
split-application of Ke0
Outcome
phosphorus recovery efficiencye1
Direction
increasede1
Value
7.4%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the split-application of K increased the nitrogen recovery efficiency in rice and wheat by 11.2% and 10.8%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–800 · show in text ↑
e1

“the phosphorus recovery efficiency was increased by 3.6% and 7.4% in rice and wheat, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–910 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Split application of 60 kg K2O/ha increased the K harvest index in rice by 0.7% over applying entire K at basal.

Treatment
split application of 60 kg K2O/hae0
Outcome
K harvest indexe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.7%e0
Comparator
applying entire K at basale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The split application of 60 kg K2O/ha also increased the K harvest index (% of the total K absorbed is transferred to grain) by 0.7% and 2.7% in rice and wheat, respectively over applying entire K at basal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–1117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Split application of 60 kg K2O/ha increased the K harvest index in wheat by 2.7% over applying entire K at basal.

Treatment
split application of 60 kg K2O/hae0
Outcome
K harvest indexe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
2.7%e0
Comparator
applying entire K at basale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The split application of 60 kg K2O/ha also increased the K harvest index (% of the total K absorbed is transferred to grain) by 0.7% and 2.7% in rice and wheat, respectively over applying entire K at basal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–1117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Split application of 60 kg K2O/ha increased system productivity (11.26 t/ha) by 8% over applying entire K at basal.

Taxon
rice-wheat cropping systemt0
Treatment
split application of 60 kg K2O/hae0
Outcome
system productivitye1
Direction
increasede1
Value
8%e1
Qualifier
11.26 t/hae1
Comparator
applying entire K at basale1

Verbatim

t0

“rice-wheat cropping system (RWCS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–160 · show in text ↑
e0

“The split application of 60 kg K2O/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–949 · show in text ↑
e1

“the system productivity (11.26 t/ha) was increased by 8% over applying entire K at basal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1218 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Where top-dressing of K (30 kg/ha) is omitted, two foliar sprays of 2.5% K give benefits equal to top dressing.

Taxon
rice-wheat cropping systemt0
Treatment
two foliar-sprays of 2.5% Ke0
Outcome
benefitse0
Direction
equale0
Qualifier
In the absence of top-dressing of K (30 kg/ha)e0
Comparator
top dressinge0

Verbatim

t0

“rice-wheat cropping system (RWCS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–160 · show in text ↑
e0

“In the absence of top-dressing of K (30 kg/ha), two foliar-sprays of 2.5% K provide equal benefits of top dressing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1220–1334 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 90 kg K2O/ha lowered the K negative balance (-99 kg/ha/year) compared with two-split application of 60 kg K2O/ha (-152.5 kg/ha/year).

Taxon
rice-wheat cropping systemt0
Treatment
Application of 90 kg K2O/hae0
Outcome
K negative balancee0
Direction
lowerede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“rice-wheat cropping system (RWCS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–160 · show in text ↑
e0

“Application of 90 kg K2O/ha lowered the K negative balance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1336–1394 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that optimizing K fertilization in the rice-wheat system will increase system productivity, nutrient use efficiency and sustainability.

Taxon
rice-wheat cropping systemt0
Outcome
system productivity, nutrient use efficiency, and sustainabilitye0

Verbatim

t0

“rice-wheat cropping system (RWCS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 127–160 · show in text ↑
e0

“optimization of K fertilization in RWCS will increase the system productivity, nutrient use efficiency, and sustainability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1502–1624 · show in text ↑

potassium · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

257 papers: 227 positive, 30 negative or no effect

226 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

253 papers more in this group

See all 257 papers →

potassium · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

383 papers: 344 positive, 39 negative or no effect

343 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

379 papers more in this group

See all 383 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.