Paper · 2025 · Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology

Enhancing Growth and Forage Quality of Cowpea through Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria Inoculations

Sedat Severoğlu

16
claims
31
verbatim quotes
1
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

This study was conducted under controlled greenhouse conditions at the Atatürk University Plant Production Application and Research Center to determine the effects of different plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) strains on growth, yield, and forage quality of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.). The study compared the strains Serratia marcescens (PGB15), Pseudomonas chlororaphis (PGB43), Bacillus megaterium (PGB38), and Rhizobium sp. (FR28) with NPK fertilizer application. The experiment was arranged in a randomized complete block design with three replications, and growth, yield, and forage quality parameters were measured. The results showed that PGPR applications provided statistically significant increases (p<0.001) in all growth and yield parameters compared to both the control group and NPK fertilizer application. The strains FR28 and PGB15 increased key vegetative growth parameters such as plant height, root length, and leaf area by more than 50%, while FR28 showed the highest biomass production with increases of 105% and 214% in stem fresh and dry weight, respectively. In terms of forage quality, FR28 and PGB15 applications enhanced crude protein content, reduced NDF and ADF values, and increased relative feed value (RFV) to 263.09 and 250.19, respectively. Correlation analyses revealed strong positive relationships between crude protein content and biomass parameters, and strong negative correlations between NDF and ADF with quality parameters. Principal component analysis indicated that the first two components explained 96.54% of the variance, identifying FR28 and PGB15 as the most effective strains in terms of biomass production and forage quality. Based on these findings, it is recommended that FR28 and PGB15 strains be considered as promising biofertilizer candidates for practical use in cowpea cultivation, offering a sustainable alternative to chemical fertilizers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPR increased cowpea growth and yield parameters relative to control and NPK.

Treatment
PGPR applicationse0
Outcome
growth and yield parameterse0
Direction
increasese0
Comparator
control group and NPK fertilizer applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PGPR applications provided statistically significant increases (p<0.001) in all growth and yield parameters compared to both the control group and NPK fertilizer application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–840 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 39–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FR28 increased plant height, root length and leaf area by more than 50%.

Treatment
FR28e0
Interactor
FR28e0symbiont
Outcome
plant height, root length, and leaf areae0
Direction
increasede0
Value
more than 50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The strains FR28 and PGB15 increased key vegetative growth parameters such as plant height, root length, and leaf area by more than 50%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–976 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 39–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGB15 increased plant height, root length and leaf area by more than 50%.

Treatment
PGB15e0
Interactor
PGB15e0symbiont
Outcome
plant height, root length, and leaf areae0
Direction
increasede0
Value
more than 50%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The strains FR28 and PGB15 increased key vegetative growth parameters such as plant height, root length, and leaf area by more than 50%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–976 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 39–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FR28 raised stem fresh weight by 105%.

Treatment
FR28e0
Interactor
FR28e0symbiont
Outcome
stem freshe0
Direction
increasese0
Value
105%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“FR28 showed the highest biomass production with increases of 105% and 214% in stem fresh and dry weight, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1102 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 39–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FR28 raised stem dry weight by 214%.

Treatment
FR28e0
Interactor
FR28e0symbiont
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
increasese0
Value
214%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“FR28 showed the highest biomass production with increases of 105% and 214% in stem fresh and dry weight, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1102 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 39–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FR28 enhanced crude protein content.

Treatment
FR28e0
Interactor
FR28e0symbiont
Outcome
crude protein contente0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“FR28 and PGB15 applications enhanced crude protein content, reduced NDF and ADF values, and increased relative feed value (RFV) to 263.09 and 250.19, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1294 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 39–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGB15 enhanced crude protein content.

Treatment
PGB15e0
Interactor
PGB15e0symbiont
Outcome
crude protein contente0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“FR28 and PGB15 applications enhanced crude protein content, reduced NDF and ADF values, and increased relative feed value (RFV) to 263.09 and 250.19, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1294 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 39–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FR28 reduced NDF and ADF.

Treatment
FR28e0
Interactor
FR28e0symbiont
Outcome
NDF and ADF valuese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“FR28 and PGB15 applications enhanced crude protein content, reduced NDF and ADF values, and increased relative feed value (RFV) to 263.09 and 250.19, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1294 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 39–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGB15 reduced NDF and ADF.

Treatment
PGB15e0
Interactor
PGB15e0symbiont
Outcome
NDF and ADF valuese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“FR28 and PGB15 applications enhanced crude protein content, reduced NDF and ADF values, and increased relative feed value (RFV) to 263.09 and 250.19, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1294 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 39–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FR28 increased relative feed value to 263.09.

Treatment
FR28e0
Interactor
FR28e0symbiont
Outcome
relative feed value (RFV)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
263.09e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“FR28 and PGB15 applications enhanced crude protein content, reduced NDF and ADF values, and increased relative feed value (RFV) to 263.09 and 250.19, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1294 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 39–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGB15 increased relative feed value to 250.19.

Treatment
PGB15e0
Interactor
PGB15e0symbiont
Outcome
relative feed value (RFV)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
250.19e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“FR28 and PGB15 applications enhanced crude protein content, reduced NDF and ADF values, and increased relative feed value (RFV) to 263.09 and 250.19, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1294 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 39–45 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crude protein content was positively related to biomass parameters.

Compound
crude protein contente0
Outcome
biomass parameterse0
Direction
positivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Correlation analyses revealed strong positive relationships between crude protein content and biomass parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1407 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 39–45 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NDF and ADF were negatively related to quality parameters.

Compound
NDF and ADFe0
Outcome
quality parameterse0
Direction
negativee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“strong negative correlations between NDF and ADF with quality parameters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1413–1486 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 39–45 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The first two PCA components explained 96.54% of variance.

Outcome
variancee0
Value
96.54%e0
Qualifier
first two componentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the first two components explained 96.54% of the variance, identifying FR28 and PGB15 as the most effective strains in terms of biomass production and forage quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1531–1697 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 39–45 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FR28 and PGB15 were identified as the most effective strains for biomass and forage quality.

Material
FR28 and PGB15e0
Outcome
most effective strains in terms of biomass production and forage qualitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“identifying FR28 and PGB15 as the most effective strains in terms of biomass production and forage quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1590–1697 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 39–45 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend FR28 and PGB15 as biofertilizer candidates.

Outcome
FR28 and PGB15 strains be considered as promising biofertilizer candidates for practical use in cowpea cultivatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it is recommended that FR28 and PGB15 strains be considered as promising biofertilizer candidates for practical use in cowpea cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1723–1860 · show in text ↑

inoculation · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

116 papers: 99 positive, 17 negative or no effect

98 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.