Paper · 2025 · Journal of Cereal Research

Influence of foliar applications of synthetic compounds on Wheat Grain Quality During Terminal Heat Stress

Tribhuwan Singh; Chandrakant Singh; Nandeesha C.V; et al.

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) plants in many locations of the world face terminal high temperature stress during the grain filling stage, which is a major contributor to a decrease in single seed weight and texture and, as a result, a reduction in grain quality and yield. To mitigate terminal heat stress of wheat strategies are followed like foliar application of nitrogenous compound, polyamines, sulfhydryl compounds and different osmoprotectants. The influence of foliar applied exogenous osmoprotectants on terminal heat stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) was investigated in the current study under field conditions and it also alter quality of grain. Synthetic osmoprotectants shows varying results on different quality attributes. Like protein content increases in compared to control when SNP (400μg/ml and 800μg/ml) and DTT (50ppm) applied at different concentration while for starch, moisture content, sedimentation value and hectolitre weight best results were observed in thiourea (20mM and 40mM) and KNO3 (1%) treatment. Same as KNO3 and DTT increases gluten content of the grains.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SNP at 400μg/ml and 800μg/ml increased wheat grain protein compared with control.

Treatment
SNP (400μg/ml and 800μg/ml)e0
Outcome
protein contente0
Direction
increasese0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“protein content increases in compared to control when SNP (400μg/ml and 800μg/ml)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–829 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DTT at 50ppm increased wheat grain protein compared with control.

Treatment
DTT (50ppm)e0
Outcome
protein contente1
Direction
increasese1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DTT (50ppm) applied at different concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–880 · show in text ↑
e1

“Like protein content increases in compared to control when SNP (400μg/ml and 800μg/ml) and DTT (50ppm) applied at different concentration while for starch, moisture content, sedimentation value and hectolitre weight best results were observed in thiourea (20mM and 40mM) and KNO3 (1%) treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–1038 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiourea at 20mM and 40mM gave the best starch, moisture, sedimentation and hectolitre results.

Treatment
thiourea (20mM and 40mM)e0
Outcome
starch, moisture content, sedimentation value and hectolitre weighte0
Direction
best resultse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for starch, moisture content, sedimentation value and hectolitre weight best results were observed in thiourea (20mM and 40mM)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 887–1013 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KNO3 at 1% gave the best starch, moisture, sedimentation and hectolitre results.

Treatment
KNO3 (1%)e0
Outcome
starch, moisture content, sedimentation value and hectolitre weighte1
Direction
best resultse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“KNO3 (1%) treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1037 · show in text ↑
e1

“Like protein content increases in compared to control when SNP (400μg/ml and 800μg/ml) and DTT (50ppm) applied at different concentration while for starch, moisture content, sedimentation value and hectolitre weight best results were observed in thiourea (20mM and 40mM) and KNO3 (1%) treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–1038 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

KNO3 increased wheat grain gluten content.

Treatment
KNO3e0
Outcome
gluten content of the grainse0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“KNO3 and DTT increases gluten content of the grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1098 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DTT increased wheat grain gluten content.

Treatment
DTTe0
Outcome
gluten content of the grainse0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“KNO3 and DTT increases gluten content of the grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1098 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑

thiourea · quality: sugar starch · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

potassium nitrate · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.