Paper · 2025 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Layered double hydroxide-seaweed composites promote seed germination and seedling growth: a new generation of biostimulants

Adrian Alejandro Espinosa-Antón; Rosalba Mireya Hernández-Herrera; Carla Vanessa Sánchez-Hernández; et al.

7
claims
11
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Introduction Agricultural producers worldwide face increasing pressure to ensure food security while contending with the adverse effects of climate change and unsustainable farming practices. Layered double hydroxides (LDHs) have been applied in agriculture due to their versatile properties as slow-release and efficient carriers, while seaweed extracts are widely used as plant biostimulants. However, their integrated use as nanostructured composites for enhancing seed germination and seedling growth remains largely unexplored. Methods In this study, we addressed this gap by synthesizing composites that combine cationic LDH nanosheets with anionic compounds present in alkaline extracts of the brown seaweed Sargassum liebmannii (LDH-Sargassum) and the green seaweed Ulva ohnoi (LDH-Ulva). The physicochemical properties of the LDH-seaweed composites were characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), dynamic light scattering (DLS), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). The biological efficacy of the composites was evaluated through seed germination and early seedling development assays in tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum L. cv. Rio Grande) and root induction assays in mung bean ( Vigna radiata L.) cuttings. Results Physicochemical analyses confirmed that approximately 12% of the composite mass corresponded to seaweed-derived molecules adsorbed onto the LDH surface. Both LDH-Sargassum and LDH-Ulva significantly improved germination and seedling growth at lower concentrations (1.57, 3.14, and 6.28 mg·mL⁻¹), while higher doses (12.56–50.25 mg·mL⁻¹) produced effects that were either comparable to those of the control or slightly better. Notably, both composites enhanced root architecture in mung bean cuttings by increasing root number, length, and dry weight. These results highlight the potential of LDH-seaweed composites as effective biostimulants, particularly in promoting early-stage root development by improving root branching, size, and biomass. Importantly, LDH-Sargassum at 6.28 mg·mL⁻¹ emerged as a promising natural alternative to synthetic root-promoting agents. Discussion This study demonstrates, for the first time, the feasibility of LDH-seaweed composites as next-generation nanostructured phycobiostimulants, providing insights into their plant interactions and identifying optimal application dosages. Overall, these findings provide a foundation for implementing LDH-seaweed composites as a sustainable strategy to reduce agrochemical inputs and advance towards food security through bio-based nanotechnologies.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

About 12% of composite mass was adsorbed seaweed-derived molecules.

Outcome
composite mass corresponded to seaweed-derived molecules adsorbed onto the LDH surfacee0
Value
12%e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“approximately 12% of the composite mass corresponded to seaweed-derived molecules adsorbed onto the LDH surface”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1436–1547 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Low-dose LDH-Sargassum significantly improved tomato germination and seedling growth.

Material
cv. Rio Grandee1
Treatment
LDH-Sargassume0
Outcome
germination and seedling growthe0
Direction
improvede0
Value
1.57, 3.14, and 6.28 mg·mL⁻¹e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both LDH-Sargassum and LDH-Ulva significantly improved germination and seedling growth at lower concentrations (1.57, 3.14, and 6.28 mg·mL⁻¹)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1549–1690 · show in text ↑
e1

“seed germination and early seedling development assays in tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum L. cv. Rio Grande)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1318 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Low-dose LDH-Ulva significantly improved tomato germination and seedling growth.

Material
cv. Rio Grandee1
Treatment
LDH-Ulvae0
Outcome
germination and seedling growthe0
Direction
improvede0
Value
1.57, 3.14, and 6.28 mg·mL⁻¹e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both LDH-Sargassum and LDH-Ulva significantly improved germination and seedling growth at lower concentrations (1.57, 3.14, and 6.28 mg·mL⁻¹)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1549–1690 · show in text ↑
e1

“seed germination and early seedling development assays in tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum L. cv. Rio Grande)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1318 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher composite doses were comparable to or slightly better than control for germination and growth.

Treatment
higher doses (12.56–50.25 mg·mL⁻¹)e0
Outcome
effectse0
Direction
comparable to those of the control or slightly bettere0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“higher doses (12.56–50.25 mg·mL⁻¹) produced effects that were either comparable to those of the control or slightly better”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1698–1820 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LDH-Sargassum increased root number, length, and dry weight in mung bean cuttings.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatae0
Organ / stage
cuttingse0
Treatment
LDH-Sargassume1
Outcome
root number, length, and dry weighte0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both composites enhanced root architecture in mung bean cuttings by increasing root number, length, and dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1831–1945 · show in text ↑
e1

“LDH-Sargassum and LDH-Ulva”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1554–1580 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

LDH-Ulva increased root number, length, and dry weight in mung bean cuttings.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatae0
Organ / stage
cuttingse0
Treatment
LDH-Ulvae1
Outcome
root number, length, and dry weighte0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both composites enhanced root architecture in mung bean cuttings by increasing root number, length, and dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1831–1945 · show in text ↑
e1

“LDH-Sargassum and LDH-Ulva”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1554–1580 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

LDH-Sargassum at 6.28 mg per mL was recommended as a natural alternative to synthetic root-promoting agents.

Treatment
LDH-Sargassum at 6.28 mg·mL⁻¹e0
Outcome
promising natural alternative to synthetic root-promoting agentse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“LDH-Sargassum at 6.28 mg·mL⁻¹ emerged as a promising natural alternative to synthetic root-promoting agents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2155–2262 · show in text ↑

Ulva · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Sargassum · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Sargassum · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.