Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Ulva spp. extracts did not significantly change tomato seedling growth compared with the control.

A claim from Effects of extracts of two Ulva spp. seaweeds on tomato germination and seedling growth · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ulva spp. extracts did not significantly change tomato seedling growth compared with the control.

Treatment
Ulva spp. extractse4
Outcome
seedling growthe4
Direction
no significant differencese4
Comparator
control (seedlings irrigated with distilled water)e5

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“After treatment with Ulva spp. extracts no significant differences in seedling growth were detected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1077
e5

“compared with the control (seedlings irrigated with distilled water)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–785
t0

“tomato germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–67

Title

Effects of extracts of two Ulva spp. seaweeds on tomato germination and seedling growth

Renata Perpetuo Reis; Antônio Carlos Silva de Andrade; Ana Carolina Calheiros; et al. Research Society and Development 2020. doi:10.33448/rsd-v9i11.10174

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-e06395cc69bdc520330401368173e1046397b14c1cfb3acebec55c2c09acde79 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

Ulva · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

botanical · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

291 papers: 203 positive, 88 negative or no effect

87 papers in the same direction as this claim · 203 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

282 papers more in this group

See all 291 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.