Paper · 2025 · BMC Plant Biology

Regulated multi-growth stage deficit drip irrigation improves growth attributes, water productivity, and yield performance of maize for hybrid seed production in an arid region

Yongling Zhang; Rang Xiao; Yunchen Zhao; et al.

10
claims
28
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Research on the agronomic and seed production responses of maize to deficit drip-irrigation is limited in the arid region of northwest China. A two-year field experiment including multi-growth stage deficit drip irrigation treatments was conducted in a randomized block design to evaluate their effects on photosynthesis, resource use efficiency, grain yield, and seed quality of maize. RESULTS: Results indicated that a mild water deficit from emergence to the tasseling stage (EJ15) had no detrimental impact on plant growth, photosynthetic attributes, and yield components. Instead, it significantly increased chlorophyll contents (9.1-22.2%), leaf area index (5.1-19.3%), dry matter (6.7-24.5%), irrigation water productivity (13.5-14.6%), and grain protein (13.2-13.8%) compared to full irrigation at all growth stages (WCK) in 2023-2024. The EJ15 increased the grain yield (2.6-6.3%) compared to WCK, but the difference was statistically not significant. On the other hand, deficit irrigation during late vegetative or/and reproductive stage markedly decreased the photosynthetic parameters, resource use efficiency, and resulted in the lowest maize yield in both years. CONCLUSION: Mild deficit irrigation during the early vegetative stages of maize can be used as a water-saving strategy for enhancing growth, water use efficiency, and seed quality without compromising the final yield in the arid region of northwest China.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early mild deficit had no detrimental effect on growth, photosynthetic attributes and yield components.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
mild water deficit from emergence to the tasseling stage (EJ15)e0
Outcome
plant growth, photosynthetic attributes, and yield componentse0
Direction
no detrimental impacte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a mild water deficit from emergence to the tasseling stage (EJ15) had no detrimental impact on plant growth, photosynthetic attributes, and yield components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–587 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early mild deficit increased chlorophyll content by 9.1-22.2%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
mild water deficit from emergence to the tasseling stage (EJ15)e1
Outcome
chlorophyll contentse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
9.1-22.2%e0
Comparator
full irrigation at all growth stages (WCK)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly increased chlorophyll contents (9.1-22.2%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–657 · show in text ↑
e1

“mild water deficit from emergence to the tasseling stage (EJ15)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–496 · show in text ↑
e2

“full irrigation at all growth stages (WCK)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–841 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early mild deficit increased leaf area index by 5.1-19.3%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
mild water deficit from emergence to the tasseling stage (EJ15)e1
Outcome
leaf area indexe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
5.1-19.3%e0
Comparator
full irrigation at all growth stages (WCK)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased chlorophyll contents (9.1-22.2%), leaf area index (5.1-19.3%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–686 · show in text ↑
e1

“mild water deficit from emergence to the tasseling stage (EJ15)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–496 · show in text ↑
e2

“full irrigation at all growth stages (WCK)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–841 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early mild deficit increased dry matter by 6.7-24.5%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
mild water deficit from emergence to the tasseling stage (EJ15)e1
Outcome
dry mattere0
Direction
increasede0
Value
6.7-24.5%e0
Comparator
full irrigation at all growth stages (WCK)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased chlorophyll contents (9.1-22.2%), leaf area index (5.1-19.3%), dry matter (6.7-24.5%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–710 · show in text ↑
e1

“mild water deficit from emergence to the tasseling stage (EJ15)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–496 · show in text ↑
e2

“full irrigation at all growth stages (WCK)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–841 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early mild deficit increased irrigation water productivity by 13.5-14.6%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
mild water deficit from emergence to the tasseling stage (EJ15)e1
Outcome
irrigation water productivitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
13.5-14.6%e0
Comparator
full irrigation at all growth stages (WCK)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased chlorophyll contents (9.1-22.2%), leaf area index (5.1-19.3%), dry matter (6.7-24.5%), irrigation water productivity (13.5-14.6%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–754 · show in text ↑
e1

“mild water deficit from emergence to the tasseling stage (EJ15)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–496 · show in text ↑
e2

“full irrigation at all growth stages (WCK)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–841 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early mild deficit increased grain protein by 13.2-13.8%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
mild water deficit from emergence to the tasseling stage (EJ15)e1
Outcome
grain proteine0
Direction
increasede0
Value
13.2-13.8%e0
Comparator
full irrigation at all growth stages (WCK)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased chlorophyll contents (9.1-22.2%), leaf area index (5.1-19.3%), dry matter (6.7-24.5%), irrigation water productivity (13.5-14.6%), and grain protein (13.2-13.8%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–786 · show in text ↑
e1

“mild water deficit from emergence to the tasseling stage (EJ15)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–496 · show in text ↑
e2

“full irrigation at all growth stages (WCK)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–841 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Early mild deficit increased yield by 2.6-6.3%, without statistical significance.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
EJ15e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
2.6-6.3%e0
Comparator
WCKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The EJ15 increased the grain yield (2.6-6.3%) compared to WCK, but the difference was statistically not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–971 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late vegetative or reproductive deficit decreased photosynthetic parameters and resource use efficiency.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
deficit irrigation during late vegetative or/and reproductive stagee0
Outcome
photosynthetic parameters, resource use efficiencye0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“deficit irrigation during late vegetative or/and reproductive stage markedly decreased the photosynthetic parameters, resource use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1133 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 126–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late vegetative or reproductive deficit resulted in the lowest yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
deficit irrigation during late vegetative or/and reproductive stagee0
Outcome
maize yielde0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“deficit irrigation during late vegetative or/and reproductive stage markedly decreased the photosynthetic parameters, resource use efficiency, and resulted in the lowest maize yield in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1187 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend early mild deficit irrigation as a water-saving strategy.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
water-saving strategy for enhancing growth, water use efficiency, and seed quality without compromising the final yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mild deficit irrigation during the early vegetative stages of maize can be used as a water-saving strategy for enhancing growth, water use efficiency, and seed quality without compromising the final yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1201–1405 · show in text ↑

drought · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

33 papers: 7 positive, 26 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

irrigation · physiology: photosynthesis · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 30 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

drought · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

85 papers: 10 positive, 75 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

81 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

121 papers: 13 positive, 108 negative or no effect

107 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

117 papers more in this group

See all 121 papers →

drought · physiology: water · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

155 papers: 39 positive, 116 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 116 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

151 papers more in this group

See all 155 papers →

drought · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

385 papers: 77 positive, 308 negative or no effect

76 papers in the same direction as this paper · 306 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

381 papers more in this group

See all 385 papers →

irrigation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,016 papers: 791 positive, 225 negative or no effect

224 papers in the same direction as this paper · 791 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

1,012 papers more in this group

See all 1,016 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.