irrigation · Physiology: photosynthesis · Zea mays (maize)
61 claims from these papers; 2 citations between them.
Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.
How these papers cite each other
2 citations between these papers: 2 on the same side, 0 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 30
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- no effect
- positive
- negative
Effects of drought-resistant fulvic acid liquid fertilizer on wheat and maize growth · 2012
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Effect of Plough Layer Constructions on Maize Growth and Yield in Western Liaoning Province · 2015
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- no effect
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Drought conditioning of rhizosphere microbiome influences maize water use traits · 2023
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 17
- no effect
- negative
- negative
- negative
Daytime Sprinkler Irrigation Effects on Net Photosynthesis of Maize and Alfalfa · 2013
- negative
- negative
- negative
- negative
- negative
- negative
Gas exchanges and mineral content of corn crops irrigated with saline water · 2021
- negative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
- negative
- negative
Use of Fava d'Anta extract in maize cultivation under saline stress · 2025
- negative
- negative
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.