Abstract
The research aimed to improve the technology of corn cultivation in intensive farming to increase the yield and quality of the crop. Therefore, this study was conducted in 2018-2020 at a large agricultural enterprise Plemzavod Irmen, located in the village of Verkh-Irmen in the Ordynsky district of the Novosibirsk region (Russia) to investigate the main indicators of the condition of leached chernozem of the forest-steppe in the Novosibirsk Ob region (field moisture, humus content, and pH of soil solution) under maize crops grown for silage and grain. The results of the effect of irrigation on the yield are reflected: Kubansky 101 by 53.8% and Katerina by 33.2%, and the photosynthetic parameters of corn by 19.6% and 18.3%, respectively. A high quality, and increased nutritional and feed value of maize grain with a high content of fat (5.1-5.7%), protein (10.3-12.5%), starch (59.4-61.4%), and sugars (3.0-3.5%). The effectiveness of the use of irrigation in the cultivation of corn was established.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation increased Kubansky 101 maize yield by 53.8%
- Material
- Kubansky 101e0
- Treatment
- irrigatione0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increaseinferrede0
- Value
- 53.8%e0
- Setting
- Novosibirsk regiont1
Zea maysNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“maize (Zea mays)”
t1“in the Novosibirsk region”
e0“The results of the effect of irrigation on the yield are reflected: Kubansky 101 by 53.8% and Katerina by 33.2%, and the photosynthetic parameters of corn by 19.6% and 18.3%, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation increased Katerina maize yield by 33.2%
- Material
- Katerinae0
- Treatment
- irrigatione0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increaseinferrede0
- Value
- 33.2%e0
- Setting
- Novosibirsk regiont1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“maize (Zea mays)”
t1“in the Novosibirsk region”
e0“The results of the effect of irrigation on the yield are reflected: Kubansky 101 by 53.8% and Katerina by 33.2%, and the photosynthetic parameters of corn by 19.6% and 18.3%, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation increased photosynthetic parameters of Kubansky 101 maize by 19.6%
- Material
- Kubansky 101e0
- Treatment
- irrigatione0
- Outcome
- photosynthetic parameterse0
- Direction
- increaseinferrede0
- Value
- 19.6%e0
- Setting
- Novosibirsk regiont1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“maize (Zea mays)”
t1“in the Novosibirsk region”
e0“The results of the effect of irrigation on the yield are reflected: Kubansky 101 by 53.8% and Katerina by 33.2%, and the photosynthetic parameters of corn by 19.6% and 18.3%, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation increased photosynthetic parameters of Katerina maize by 18.3%
- Material
- Katerinae0
- Treatment
- irrigatione0
- Outcome
- photosynthetic parameterse0
- Direction
- increaseinferrede0
- Value
- 18.3%e0
- Setting
- Novosibirsk regiont1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“maize (Zea mays)”
t1“in the Novosibirsk region”
e0“The results of the effect of irrigation on the yield are reflected: Kubansky 101 by 53.8% and Katerina by 33.2%, and the photosynthetic parameters of corn by 19.6% and 18.3%, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Maize grain showed increased nutritional and feed value
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“maize (Zea mays)”
e1“A high quality, and increased nutritional and feed value of maize grain with a high content of fat (5.1-5.7%), protein (10.3-12.5%), starch (59.4-61.4%), and sugars (3.0-3.5%)”
Claim · model-written summary
Maize grain had a high fat content of 5.1-5.7%
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“maize (Zea mays)”
e1“A high quality, and increased nutritional and feed value of maize grain with a high content of fat (5.1-5.7%), protein (10.3-12.5%), starch (59.4-61.4%), and sugars (3.0-3.5%)”
Claim · model-written summary
Maize grain had a high protein content of 10.3-12.5%
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“maize (Zea mays)”
e1“A high quality, and increased nutritional and feed value of maize grain with a high content of fat (5.1-5.7%), protein (10.3-12.5%), starch (59.4-61.4%), and sugars (3.0-3.5%)”
Claim · model-written summary
Maize grain had a high starch content of 59.4-61.4%
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“maize (Zea mays)”
e1“A high quality, and increased nutritional and feed value of maize grain with a high content of fat (5.1-5.7%), protein (10.3-12.5%), starch (59.4-61.4%), and sugars (3.0-3.5%)”
Claim · model-written summary
Maize grain had a high sugar content of 3.0-3.5%
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“maize (Zea mays)”
e1“A high quality, and increased nutritional and feed value of maize grain with a high content of fat (5.1-5.7%), protein (10.3-12.5%), starch (59.4-61.4%), and sugars (3.0-3.5%)”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · physiology: photosynthesis · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
43 papers more in this group
See all 47 papers →irrigation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
790 papers in the same direction as this paper · 209 in the opposite direction · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
1,012 papers more in this group
See all 1,016 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.