Abstract
, water use efficiency, grain growth rate and yield increment under water-saving irrigation were higher than those under normal irrigation. Thus, mixtures of cow manure and wheat straw returned combined with normal irrigation could significantly increase photosynthetic properties of ear leaves and dry matter accumulation, which were the major reasons for yield enhancement. Importantly, the mixture of cow manure and wheat straw returned combined with water-saving irrigation could decrease the loss of crop yield resulted from lower irrigation.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Water-saving irrigation increased maize water-use efficiency relative to normal irrigation.
- Treatment
- water-saving irrigatione0
- Outcome
- water use efficiencye0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- normal irrigatione0
Zea maysOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“water use efficiency, grain growth rate and yield increment under water-saving irrigation were higher than those under normal irrigation.”
t0“maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Water-saving irrigation increased maize grain growth rate relative to normal irrigation.
- Treatment
- water-saving irrigatione0
- Outcome
- grain growth ratee0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- normal irrigatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“water use efficiency, grain growth rate and yield increment under water-saving irrigation were higher than those under normal irrigation.”
t0“maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Water-saving irrigation increased maize yield increment relative to normal irrigation.
- Treatment
- water-saving irrigatione0
- Outcome
- yield incremente0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- normal irrigatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“water use efficiency, grain growth rate and yield increment under water-saving irrigation were higher than those under normal irrigation.”
t0“maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Cow manure and wheat straw with normal irrigation increased maize ear-leaf photosynthetic properties.
- Organ / stage
- ear leavese0
- Treatment
- mixtures of cow manure and wheat straw returned combined with normal irrigatione0
- Outcome
- photosynthetic properties of ear leavese0
- Direction
- increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“mixtures of cow manure and wheat straw returned combined with normal irrigation could significantly increase photosynthetic properties of ear leaves and dry matter accumulation”
t0“maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Cow manure and wheat straw with normal irrigation increased maize dry matter accumulation.
- Treatment
- mixtures of cow manure and wheat straw returned combined with normal irrigatione0
- Outcome
- dry matter accumulatione0
- Direction
- increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“mixtures of cow manure and wheat straw returned combined with normal irrigation could significantly increase photosynthetic properties of ear leaves and dry matter accumulation”
t0“maize”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors attributed maize yield enhancement to increased ear-leaf photosynthesis and dry matter accumulation.
- Outcome
- yield enhancemente0
- Qualifier
- photosynthetic properties of ear leaves and dry matter accumulatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“photosynthetic properties of ear leaves and dry matter accumulation, which were the major reasons for yield enhancement.”
t0“maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Cow manure and wheat straw with water-saving irrigation reduced maize yield loss due to lower irrigation.
- Treatment
- mixture of cow manure and wheat straw returned combined with water-saving irrigatione0
- Outcome
- loss of crop yielde0
- Direction
- decreasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the mixture of cow manure and wheat straw returned combined with water-saving irrigation could decrease the loss of crop yield resulted from lower irrigation.”
t0“maize”
The same questions in other papers
Triticum aestivum · physiology: photosynthesis · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
Triticum aestivum · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
82 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
98 papers more in this group
See all 102 papers →fertilization · physiology: photosynthesis · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
100 papers more in this group
See all 104 papers →irrigation · physiology: photosynthesis · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
43 papers more in this group
See all 47 papers →irrigation · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
207 papers in the same direction as this paper · 80 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
285 papers more in this group
See all 289 papers →irrigation · physiology: water · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
283 papers in the same direction as this paper · 39 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
320 papers more in this group
See all 324 papers →organic · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
329 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
369 papers more in this group
See all 373 papers →irrigation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
790 papers in the same direction as this paper · 209 in the opposite direction · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
1,012 papers more in this group
See all 1,016 papers →8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.