Paper · 2025 · Microorganisms

Organic and Inorganic Phosphorus Inputs Shape Wheat Productivity and Soil Bioavailability: A Microbial and Enzymatic Perspective from Long-Term Field Trials

Zhiyi Zhang; Yafen Gan; Fulin Zhang; et al.

14
claims
35
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Bioavailable phosphorus is essential for sustaining high crop productivity, yet excessive inorganic P fertilization often leads to P accumulation in stable soil forms, reducing utilization efficiency. Straw serves as an organic P source and enhances P availability by stimulating microbial activity. However, systematic studies on how organic P inputs (straw returning) and inorganic P fertilizers regulate soil bioavailable P through microbial and enzymatic processes remain limited. A 16-year field experiment was carried out in a rice-wheat rotation system, including five fertilization treatments: no fertilization (CK), optimized fertilization (OPT), increased N (OPTN), increased P (OPTP), and optimized fertilization combined with straw mulching/returning (OPTM). This study evaluates the impacts of long-term organic and inorganic P sources on soil P fractions, extracellular enzyme activities, and the composition of microbial communities, alongside their collective contributions to crop yield. In this study, based on soil samples collected in 2023, we found that fertilization led to significant increases in Citrate-P and HCl-P, enhanced the activities of β-1,4-glucosidase (BG), β-D-cellobiosidase (CBH), and β-1,4-N-acetylglucosaminidase (NAG), and altered both microbial diversity and co-occurrence network complexity. The OPTM treatment showed the highest yield and improved microbial diversity and network complexity, with Enzyme-P, Citrate-P, and HCl-P increasing by 62.64%, 11.24%, and 9.49%, and BG, CBH, and NAG activities rising by 22.74%, 40.90%, and 18.09% compared to OPT. Mantel tests and random forest analyses revealed significant associations between microbial community and biochemical properties, while partial least squares path modeling (PLS-PM) indicated that inorganic P source enhanced yield primarily through altering soil P dynamics and enzymatic processes, while microbial communities under organic P source acted as key mediators to increase crop productivity. These findings deepen insights into how microbial communities and enzymatic stoichiometry synergistically regulate phosphorus bioavailability and wheat yield, providing a theoretical basis for sustainable fertilization practices in rice-wheat rotation systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization significantly increased Citrate-P and HCl-P in the soil of the wheat system.

Treatment
fertilizatione0
Outcome
Citrate-P and HCl-Pe0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fertilization led to significant increases in Citrate-P and HCl-P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1140 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization enhanced the activities of BG, CBH and NAG enzymes.

Treatment
fertilizatione0
Outcome
the activities of β-1,4-glucosidase (BG), β-D-cellobiosidase (CBH), and β-1,4-N-acetylglucosaminidase (NAG)e0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fertilization led to significant increases in Citrate-P and HCl-P, enhanced the activities of β-1,4-glucosidase (BG), β-D-cellobiosidase (CBH), and β-1,4-N-acetylglucosaminidase (NAG)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1258 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization altered microbial diversity and co-occurrence network complexity.

Treatment
fertilizatione1
Outcome
microbial diversity and co-occurrence network complexitye0
Direction
alterede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“altered both microbial diversity and co-occurrence network complexity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1333 · show in text ↑
e1

“fertilization led to significant increases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1117 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The OPTM treatment showed the highest yield.

Treatment
OPTMe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The OPTM treatment showed the highest yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1378 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The OPTM treatment improved microbial diversity and network complexity.

Treatment
OPTMe0
Outcome
microbial diversity and network complexitye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The OPTM treatment showed the highest yield and improved microbial diversity and network complexity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1434 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

OPTM raised Enzyme-P by 62.64% compared with OPT.

Treatment
OPTMe0
Outcome
Enzyme-Pe1
Direction
increasinge1
Value
62.64%e1
Comparator
OPTe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The OPTM treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1353 · show in text ↑
e1

“Enzyme-P, Citrate-P, and HCl-P increasing by 62.64%, 11.24%, and 9.49%, and BG, CBH, and NAG activities rising by 22.74%, 40.90%, and 18.09% compared to OPT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1441–1597 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

OPTM raised Citrate-P by 11.24% compared with OPT.

Treatment
OPTMe0
Outcome
Citrate-Pe1
Direction
increasinge1
Value
11.24%e1
Comparator
OPTe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The OPTM treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1353 · show in text ↑
e1

“Enzyme-P, Citrate-P, and HCl-P increasing by 62.64%, 11.24%, and 9.49%, and BG, CBH, and NAG activities rising by 22.74%, 40.90%, and 18.09% compared to OPT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1441–1597 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

OPTM raised HCl-P by 9.49% compared with OPT.

Treatment
OPTMe0
Outcome
HCl-Pe1
Direction
increasinge1
Value
9.49%e1
Comparator
OPTe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The OPTM treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1353 · show in text ↑
e1

“Enzyme-P, Citrate-P, and HCl-P increasing by 62.64%, 11.24%, and 9.49%, and BG, CBH, and NAG activities rising by 22.74%, 40.90%, and 18.09% compared to OPT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1441–1597 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

OPTM raised BG activity by 22.74% compared with OPT.

Treatment
OPTMe0
Outcome
BGe1
Direction
risinge1
Value
22.74%e1
Comparator
OPTe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The OPTM treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1353 · show in text ↑
e1

“Enzyme-P, Citrate-P, and HCl-P increasing by 62.64%, 11.24%, and 9.49%, and BG, CBH, and NAG activities rising by 22.74%, 40.90%, and 18.09% compared to OPT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1441–1597 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

OPTM raised CBH activity by 40.90% compared with OPT.

Treatment
OPTMe0
Outcome
CBHe1
Direction
risinge1
Value
40.90%e1
Comparator
OPTe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The OPTM treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1353 · show in text ↑
e1

“Enzyme-P, Citrate-P, and HCl-P increasing by 62.64%, 11.24%, and 9.49%, and BG, CBH, and NAG activities rising by 22.74%, 40.90%, and 18.09% compared to OPT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1441–1597 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

OPTM raised NAG activity by 18.09% compared with OPT.

Treatment
OPTMe0
Outcome
NAGe1
Direction
risinge1
Value
18.09%e1
Comparator
OPTe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The OPTM treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1353 · show in text ↑
e1

“Enzyme-P, Citrate-P, and HCl-P increasing by 62.64%, 11.24%, and 9.49%, and BG, CBH, and NAG activities rising by 22.74%, 40.90%, and 18.09% compared to OPT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1441–1597 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mantel tests and random forest analyses revealed significant associations between microbial community and biochemical properties.

Outcome
significant associations between microbial community and biochemical propertiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mantel tests and random forest analyses revealed significant associations between microbial community and biochemical properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1599–1727 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–64 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PLS-PM indicated that the inorganic P source enhanced yield mainly by altering soil P dynamics and enzymatic processes.

Treatment
inorganic P sourcee0
Outcome
enhanced yielde0
Qualifier
altering soil P dynamics and enzymatic processese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inorganic P source enhanced yield primarily through altering soil P dynamics and enzymatic processes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1795–1895 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–64 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PLS-PM indicated that microbial communities under the organic P source were key mediators of increased crop productivity.

Treatment
organic P sourcee0
Outcome
crop productivitye0
Qualifier
microbial communitiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“microbial communities under organic P source acted as key mediators to increase crop productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1903–2000 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–64 · show in text ↑

fertilization · soil: biology · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

82 papers: 77 positive, 5 negative or no effect

76 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

78 papers more in this group

See all 82 papers →

organic · physiology: enzyme activity · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

organic · soil: biology · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 20 positive, 2 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

fertilization · physiology: enzyme activity · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 29 positive, 3 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

organic · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

322 papers: 281 positive, 41 negative or no effect

280 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

318 papers more in this group

See all 322 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.