Paper · 2011 · Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science

Effect of Summer Crops and their Residue Management on Yield of Succeeding Wheat and Soil Properties

Ramesh Chandra

20
claims
33
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The effect of summer crops and their residue incorporation on succeeding wheat crop and soil properties was studied in field conditions for two consecutive years on silty clay loam Typic Hapludoll. Soybean-wheat sequence recorded the highest grain and straw yields of wheat as well as organic C, available N and K, dehydrogenase activity and counts of fungi in soil, while pigeon pea-wheat sequence gave the maximum available P and microbial biomass C (MBC) after two crop cycles. Wheat grain yield, organic C and available N, P and K, MBC and dehydogenase enzyme activity in soil under different legume-based sequences were significantly higher than under cereal-based sequences, but no significant variations were observed in microbial counts. Legumes-based sequences also resulted in more organic C and available P and K in soil compared to their content at initiation of the study, while all the crop sequences improved microbial biomass C and dehydrogenase activity in the soil. Different crop sequences, except rice-wheat, also improved the counts of bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes in soil. Mean grain and straw yields of wheat for two years and organic C, available N and P in soil at the end following residue incorporation were significantly higher over removal, by 6.6, 4.4, 3.4, 7.2 and 7.8%, respectively. It also increased the microbial population and MBC by 10.2%, and dehydogenase activity by 10.2%, in the soil after harvest of 2nd wheat crop. Increasing fertilizer levels did not increase the mean grain and straw yields; however, application of 100% recommended NPK recorded significant improvement in available K and MBC and 125% NPK in mean grain and straw yields and dehydrogensae activity and population of bacteria and fungi in soil over 75% NPK level. Soybean-wheat sequence produced the highest wheat yield, organic C, available N and K in soil and various soil biological properties. Irrespective of summer crops, their residue incorporation improved the yield of succeeding wheat and soil properties.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean-wheat gave the highest wheat grain and straw yields.

Treatment
Soybean-wheat sequencee0
Outcome
grain and straw yields of wheate0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soybean-wheat sequence recorded the highest grain and straw yields of wheat as well as organic C, available N and K, dehydrogenase activity and counts of fungi in soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 198–365 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean-wheat gave the highest soil organic C, available N and K.

Treatment
Soybean-wheat sequencee0
Outcome
organic C, available N and Ke0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soybean-wheat sequence recorded the highest grain and straw yields of wheat as well as organic C, available N and K, dehydrogenase activity and counts of fungi in soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 198–365 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean-wheat gave the highest soil dehydrogenase activity and fungal counts.

Treatment
Soybean-wheat sequencee0
Outcome
dehydrogenase activity and counts of fungi in soile0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soybean-wheat sequence recorded the highest grain and straw yields of wheat as well as organic C, available N and K, dehydrogenase activity and counts of fungi in soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 198–365 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pigeon pea-wheat maximized available P and microbial biomass C after two cycles.

Treatment
pigeon pea-wheat sequencee0
Outcome
available P and microbial biomass C (MBC)e0
Direction
maximume0
Qualifier
after two crop cyclese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pigeon pea-wheat sequence gave the maximum available P and microbial biomass C (MBC) after two crop cycles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–479 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Legume sequences significantly raised wheat grain yield relative to cereal sequences.

Treatment
different legume-based sequencese0
Outcome
Wheat grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
cereal-based sequencese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat grain yield, organic C and available N, P and K, MBC and dehydogenase enzyme activity in soil under different legume-based sequences were significantly higher than under cereal-based sequences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–679 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Legume sequences significantly raised soil organic C and available N, P and K relative to cereal sequences.

Treatment
different legume-based sequencese0
Outcome
organic C and available N, P and Ke0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
cereal-based sequencese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat grain yield, organic C and available N, P and K, MBC and dehydogenase enzyme activity in soil under different legume-based sequences were significantly higher than under cereal-based sequences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–679 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Legume sequences significantly raised soil MBC and dehydrogenase relative to cereal sequences.

Treatment
different legume-based sequencese0
Outcome
MBC and dehydogenase enzyme activity in soile0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
cereal-based sequencese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat grain yield, organic C and available N, P and K, MBC and dehydogenase enzyme activity in soil under different legume-based sequences were significantly higher than under cereal-based sequences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–679 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial counts did not vary significantly between legume and cereal sequences.

Treatment
legume-based sequencese1
Outcome
microbial countse0
Comparator
cereal-based sequencese1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no significant variations were observed in microbial counts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–744 · show in text ↑
e1

“under different legume-based sequences were significantly higher than under cereal-based sequences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–679 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Legume sequences increased soil organic C and available P and K from baseline.

Treatment
Legumes-based sequencese0
Outcome
organic C and available P and K in soile0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
their content at initiation of the studye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Legumes-based sequences also resulted in more organic C and available P and K in soil compared to their content at initiation of the study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–884 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All crop sequences improved soil MBC and dehydrogenase activity.

Treatment
all the crop sequencese0
Outcome
microbial biomass C and dehydrogenase activity in the soile0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all the crop sequences improved microbial biomass C and dehydrogenase activity in the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–982 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All crop sequences except rice-wheat improved bacterial, fungal and actinomycete counts.

Treatment
Different crop sequences, except rice-wheate0
Outcome
counts of bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes in soile0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Different crop sequences, except rice-wheat, also improved the counts of bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes in soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1099 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Residue incorporation increased grain by 6.6 over removal.

Treatment
residue incorporatione0
Outcome
graine0
Direction
highere0
Value
6.6e0
Comparator
removale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mean grain and straw yields of wheat for two years and organic C, available N and P in soil at the end following residue incorporation were significantly higher over removal, by 6.6, 4.4, 3.4, 7.2 and 7.8%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1320 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Residue incorporation increased straw yields of wheat by 4.4 over removal.

Treatment
residue incorporatione0
Outcome
straw yields of wheate0
Direction
highere0
Value
4.4e0
Comparator
removale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mean grain and straw yields of wheat for two years and organic C, available N and P in soil at the end following residue incorporation were significantly higher over removal, by 6.6, 4.4, 3.4, 7.2 and 7.8%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1320 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Residue incorporation increased organic C by 3.4 over removal.

Treatment
residue incorporatione0
Outcome
organic Ce0
Direction
highere0
Value
3.4e0
Comparator
removale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mean grain and straw yields of wheat for two years and organic C, available N and P in soil at the end following residue incorporation were significantly higher over removal, by 6.6, 4.4, 3.4, 7.2 and 7.8%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1320 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Residue incorporation increased available N by 7.2 over removal.

Treatment
residue incorporatione0
Outcome
available Ne0
Direction
highere0
Value
7.2e0
Comparator
removale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mean grain and straw yields of wheat for two years and organic C, available N and P in soil at the end following residue incorporation were significantly higher over removal, by 6.6, 4.4, 3.4, 7.2 and 7.8%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1320 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Residue incorporation increased P in soil by 7.8% over removal.

Treatment
residue incorporatione0
Outcome
P in soile0
Direction
highere0
Value
7.8%e0
Comparator
removale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mean grain and straw yields of wheat for two years and organic C, available N and P in soil at the end following residue incorporation were significantly higher over removal, by 6.6, 4.4, 3.4, 7.2 and 7.8%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1320 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residue incorporation increased soil microbial population and MBC by 10.2%.

Treatment
residue incorporatione1
Outcome
microbial population and MBCe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10.2%e0
Comparator
removale1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It also increased the microbial population and MBC by 10.2%, and dehydogenase activity by 10.2%, in the soil after harvest of 2nd wheat crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1462 · show in text ↑
e1

“residue incorporation were significantly higher over removal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1273 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residue incorporation increased soil dehydrogenase by 10.2%.

Treatment
residue incorporatione2
Outcome
dehydogenase activitye0
Direction
increasede1
Value
10.2%e0
Comparator
removale2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dehydogenase activity by 10.2%, in the soil after harvest of 2nd wheat crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1386–1462 · show in text ↑
e1

“It also increased the microbial population and MBC by 10.2%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1380 · show in text ↑
e2

“residue incorporation were significantly higher over removal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1273 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raising fertilizer levels did not increase mean wheat grain or straw yields.

Treatment
Increasing fertilizer levelse0
Outcome
mean grain and straw yieldse0
Direction
did not increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing fertilizer levels did not increase the mean grain and straw yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1463–1540 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative to 75% NPK, 100% NPK improved available K and MBC, while 125% NPK improved yield, dehydrogenase and bacterial and fungal populations.

Treatment
100% recommended NPKe0
Outcome
available K and MBCe0
Direction
improvemente0
Qualifier
125% NPK in mean grain and straw yields and dehydrogensae activity and population of bacteria and fungi in soile0
Comparator
75% NPK levele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 100% recommended NPK recorded significant improvement in available K and MBC and 125% NPK in mean grain and straw yields and dehydrogensae activity and population of bacteria and fungi in soil over 75% NPK level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1551–1778 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80 · show in text ↑

fertilization · soil: biology · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

82 papers: 77 positive, 5 negative or no effect

76 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

78 papers more in this group

See all 82 papers →

organic · physiology: enzyme activity · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

rotation · soil: biology · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

organic · soil: biology · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 20 positive, 2 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

organic · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

57 papers: 53 positive, 4 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

53 papers more in this group

See all 57 papers →

organic · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

322 papers: 281 positive, 41 negative or no effect

280 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

318 papers more in this group

See all 322 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

322 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3,115 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.