Paper · 2025 · Applied Food Research

Effects of different drying methods on the drying characteristics, microstructure, physicochemical quality, and seed coat anthocyanins of black peanut

Tingting Zhang; Jiaxin Bo; Can Hua; et al.

12
claims
21
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Peanuts are an important cash crop, freshly harvested peanuts have a high moisture content and must be dried before further processing and storage. This study employed natural drying (ND), heat pump drying (HPD), infrared drying (ID), and microwave drying (MD) to dry black peanuts, evaluating their drying characteristics, specific energy consumption, hardness, appearance, microstructure, nutritional quality (protein, fat, and amino acids), oil quality (acid value, peroxide value, and fatty acids), and anthocyanins in the seed coat. The results indicated that the drying times for ND, HPD, ID, and MD were 50 hours, 15 hours, 18.5 hours, and 2.33 hours, respectively. Among the mechanical drying methods, MD exhibited the lowest specific energy consumption, demonstrating superior energy efficiency. Compared to the ND group, the three mechanically dried peanut samples exhibited a more compact and flat structure, with significantly increased hardness, crude protein, and total amino acid content, as well as significantly reduced acid and peroxide values. Notably, MD effectively preserved anthocyanins from the fresh peanut hulls, resulting in the smallest total color difference (ΔE = 3.04), which was closest to that of the fresh sample. Furthermore, MD resulted in a higher content of monounsaturated fatty acids but a lower crude fat content, with slight swelling of the seed coat. Overall, MD offers significant advantages in shortening the drying cycle while maintaining the nutritional and sensory qualities of black peanuts and exhibits low specific energy consumption, providing a theoretical basis for their industrial processing.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Natural drying took 50 hours.

Taxon
black peanutt0
Treatment
NDe0
Outcome
drying timese0
Value
50 hourse0

Verbatim

t0

“black peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 138–150 · show in text ↑
e0

“the drying times for ND, HPD, ID, and MD were 50 hours, 15 hours, 18.5 hours, and 2.33 hours, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–671 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Heat pump drying took 15 hours.

Taxon
black peanutt0
Treatment
HPDe0
Outcome
drying timese0
Value
15 hourse0

Verbatim

t0

“black peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 138–150 · show in text ↑
e0

“the drying times for ND, HPD, ID, and MD were 50 hours, 15 hours, 18.5 hours, and 2.33 hours, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–671 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infrared drying took 18.5 hours.

Taxon
black peanutt0
Treatment
IDe0
Outcome
drying timese0
Value
18.5 hourse0

Verbatim

t0

“black peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 138–150 · show in text ↑
e0

“the drying times for ND, HPD, ID, and MD were 50 hours, 15 hours, 18.5 hours, and 2.33 hours, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–671 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microwave drying took 2.33 hours.

Taxon
black peanutt0
Treatment
MDe0
Outcome
drying timese0
Value
2.33 hourse0

Verbatim

t0

“black peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 138–150 · show in text ↑
e0

“the drying times for ND, HPD, ID, and MD were 50 hours, 15 hours, 18.5 hours, and 2.33 hours, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–671 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microwave drying had the lowest specific energy consumption among mechanical methods.

Taxon
black peanutt0
Treatment
MDe0
Outcome
specific energy consumptione0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
mechanical drying methodse0

Verbatim

t0

“black peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 138–150 · show in text ↑
e0

“Among the mechanical drying methods, MD exhibited the lowest specific energy consumption”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–761 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mechanically dried peanuts had more compact, flat structure and significantly greater hardness, crude protein and total amino acids than naturally dried peanuts.

Treatment
three mechanically dried peanut samplese0
Outcome
hardness, crude protein, and total amino acid contente0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
ND groupe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to the ND group, the three mechanically dried peanut samples exhibited a more compact and flat structure, with significantly increased hardness, crude protein, and total amino acid content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–1002 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mechanically dried peanut samples had significantly lower acid and peroxide values than natural drying.

Treatment
three mechanically dried peanut samplese0
Outcome
acid and peroxide valuese0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
ND groupe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to the ND group, the three mechanically dried peanut samples exhibited a more compact and flat structure, with significantly increased hardness, crude protein, and total amino acid content, as well as significantly reduced acid and peroxide values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–1061 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microwave drying preserved anthocyanins from fresh peanut hulls.

Treatment
MDe0
Outcome
anthocyanins from the fresh peanut hullse0
Direction
preservede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MD effectively preserved anthocyanins from the fresh peanut hulls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microwave drying produced the smallest total color difference, ΔE = 3.04, closest to fresh peanuts.

Taxon
black peanutt0
Outcome
total color differencee0
Direction
smalleste0
Value
ΔE = 3.04e0
Comparator
fresh samplee0

Not reportedTreatment

Verbatim

t0

“black peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 138–150 · show in text ↑
e0

“resulting in the smallest total color difference (ΔE = 3.04), which was closest to that of the fresh sample”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1246 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microwave drying increased monounsaturated fatty acid content.

Taxon
black peanutt0
Treatment
MDe0
Outcome
content of monounsaturated fatty acidse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“black peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 138–150 · show in text ↑
e0

“MD resulted in a higher content of monounsaturated fatty acids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1261–1323 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microwave drying lowered crude fat content.

Taxon
black peanutt0
Treatment
MDe0
Outcome
crude fat contente0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“black peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 138–150 · show in text ↑
e0

“MD resulted in a higher content of monounsaturated fatty acids but a lower crude fat content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1261–1353 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microwave drying slightly swelled the seed coat.

Taxon
black peanutt0
Outcome
slight swelling of the seed coate0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0

“black peanut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 138–150 · show in text ↑
e0

“with slight swelling of the seed coat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1355–1392 · show in text ↑

processing · quality: phytochemicals · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

processing · molecular: metabolites · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 4 positive, 11 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

physical treatment · quality: phytochemicals · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.