Paper · 2025 · Plant Stress

Nitrogen and melatonin synergistically alleviate drought stress in wheat by enhancing photosynthesis, nitrogen metabolism, and antioxidant defense

Jinhui Xie; Yuxuan Liu; Yang Liu; et al.

11
claims
25
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Nitrogen (N) and exogenous melatonin (MT) have been demonstrated to effectively mitigate drought stress. However, the regulatory mechanisms underlying their interactive effects on post-anthesis drought responses in wheat remain unclear. This study explored the impacts of N and MT on photosynthesis, plant water relations, antioxidant defense system, N metabolism and remobilization, root architecture, yield, and water and N use efficiency. Compared with drought stress (DS), the co-application of 260 kg N hm -2 (N2) and 100 µmol·L -1 MT (M1) markedly increased the leaf photosynthetic rate root vitality, and root hydraulic conductivity. Under N2 conditions, MT treatment further enhanced the activities of superoxide dismutase, peroxidase, catalase, and glutathione reductase, as well as the contents of proline and betaine, thereby improving antioxidant capacity and cell membrane stability, as evidenced by the lower levels of superoxide anion and malondialdehyde. Additionally, N2 enhanced the regulatory effect of M1 on N metabolism, as evidenced by higher activities of nitrate reductase, glutamine synthetase, glutamate dehydrogenase, and elevated free amino acids content. Compared with DS, N2M1 treatment increased aboveground N accumulation and the contribution of pre-anthesis N translocation to grain N by 30.8% and 11.1%, respectively, resulting in a 20.4% increase in wheat yield. The higher water use efficiency for grain and biomass was mainly attributed to the increased root density and root hydraulic conductivity in the deep soil layer. N use efficiency increased with the rise in MT concentration, particularly under the N1 conditions. Collectively, appropriate N augmentation combined with MT can enhance drought tolerance in wheat, representing a promising cultivation management strategy to mitigate the adverse effects of post-anthesis drought.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined nitrogen and melatonin increased wheat leaf photosynthetic rate, root vitality, and root hydraulic conductivity relative to drought stress.

Treatment
co-application of 260 kg N hm -2 (N2) and 100 µmol·L -1 MT (M1)e0
Outcome
leaf photosynthetic rate root vitality, and root hydraulic conductivitye0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
drought stress (DS)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with drought stress (DS), the co-application of 260 kg N hm -2 (N2) and 100 µmol·L -1 MT (M1) markedly increased the leaf photosynthetic rate root vitality, and root hydraulic conductivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–639 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under N2, melatonin enhanced four antioxidant enzyme activities.

Treatment
MT treatmente0
Outcome
activities of superoxide dismutase, peroxidase, catalase, and glutathione reductasee0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
N2 conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under N2 conditions, MT treatment further enhanced the activities of superoxide dismutase, peroxidase, catalase, and glutathione reductase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 641–779 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under N2, melatonin enhanced proline and betaine content.

Treatment
MT treatmente1
Outcome
contents of proline and betainee0
Direction
enhancede1
Comparator
N2 conditionse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“as well as the contents of proline and betaine, thereby improving antioxidant capacity and cell membrane stability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–895 · show in text ↑
e1

“Under N2 conditions, MT treatment further enhanced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 641–691 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The treatment improved antioxidant capacity and cell membrane stability.

Treatment
MT treatmente1
Outcome
antioxidant capacity and cell membrane stabilitye0
Direction
improvinge0
Comparator
N2 conditionse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“thereby improving antioxidant capacity and cell membrane stability, as evidenced by the lower levels of superoxide anion and malondialdehyde”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–969 · show in text ↑
e1

“Under N2 conditions, MT treatment further enhanced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 641–691 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under N2, M1 increased nitrate reductase, glutamine synthetase, and glutamate dehydrogenase activities.

Treatment
M1e0
Outcome
activities of nitrate reductase, glutamine synthetase, glutamate dehydrogenasee0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N2 enhanced the regulatory effect of M1 on N metabolism, as evidenced by higher activities of nitrate reductase, glutamine synthetase, glutamate dehydrogenase, and elevated free amino acids content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1182 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under N2, M1 elevated free amino acids content.

Treatment
M1e0
Outcome
free amino acids contente0
Direction
elevatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N2 enhanced the regulatory effect of M1 on N metabolism, as evidenced by higher activities of nitrate reductase, glutamine synthetase, glutamate dehydrogenase, and elevated free amino acids content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1182 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N2M1 increased aboveground nitrogen accumulation by 30.8%.

Treatment
N2M1 treatmente0
Outcome
aboveground N accumulatione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
30.8%e0
Comparator
DSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with DS, N2M1 treatment increased aboveground N accumulation and the contribution of pre-anthesis N translocation to grain N by 30.8% and 11.1%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1350 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N2M1 increased the contribution of pre-anthesis nitrogen translocation to grain nitrogen by 11.1%.

Treatment
N2M1 treatmente0
Outcome
contribution of pre-anthesis N translocation to grain Ne0
Direction
increasede0
Value
11.1%e0
Comparator
DSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with DS, N2M1 treatment increased aboveground N accumulation and the contribution of pre-anthesis N translocation to grain N by 30.8% and 11.1%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1350 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N2M1 increased wheat yield by 20.4%.

Treatment
N2M1 treatmente1
Outcome
wheat yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
20.4%e0
Comparator
DSe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“resulting in a 20.4% increase in wheat yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1352–1396 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared with DS, N2M1 treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1216 · show in text ↑
e2

“wheat yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1385–1396 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water use efficiency for grain and biomass was higher, attributed to increased deep root density and hydraulic conductivity.

Outcome
water use efficiency for grain and biomasse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
increased root density and root hydraulic conductivity in the deep soil layere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The higher water use efficiency for grain and biomass was mainly attributed to the increased root density and root hydraulic conductivity in the deep soil layer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1398–1558 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen use efficiency increased with melatonin concentration, particularly under N1.

Treatment
MT concentratione0
Outcome
N use efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
particularly under the N1 conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N use efficiency increased with the rise in MT concentration, particularly under the N1 conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1560–1658 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–72 · show in text ↑

melatonin · physiology: osmolytes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

melatonin · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

18 papers: 18 positive, 0 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

melatonin · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

21 papers: 21 positive, 0 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

melatonin · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

23 papers: 23 positive, 0 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.