Paper · 2025 · Plant Nano Biology

Supplementation with Fe3O4 and ZnO nanoparticles as a strategy for agronomic bioenrichment of lettuce and cucumber

Sánchez-Portillo Steffanny; Juárez-Maldonado Antonio; Benavides-Mendoza Adalberto; et al.

17
claims
31
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Iron (Fe) and zinc (Zn) play a crucial role in the development of both plants and humans. In plants, the uptake and translocation of these elements to commercially important tissues depends on the application method, route, and concentration used. Therefore, supplementation with these two elements is not standardized. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of different Fe and Zn sources (ionic and nanometric) to determine the optimal application route and determine the appropriate concentration that promotes Fe and Zn bioaccumulation without inducing plant toxicity. Ionic sources of Fe and Zn (FeSO 4 ·4 H 2 O and ZnSO 4 ·7 H 2 O, respectively), and nanoparticles (NPs) of ZnO (50 and 250 ppm) and Fe 3 O 4 (100 and 500 ppm) were applied via drenching and foliar application on lettuce and cucumber plants grown in greenhouse. Dry biomass, biochemical variables, stress indicators and Fe and Zn accumulation were quantified in leaf tissue. In cucumbers, chlorophylls, β-carotene, and yellow pigments responded favorably (p < 0.01) to drenching with of 100 ppm Fe 3 O 4 NPs. The same treatment but via foliar application significantly increased βCA activity and decreased proline, H 2 O 2 , and MDA content by 15.2 %. In contrast, vitamin C increased (p < 0.05) with ionic forms via drenching; however, in lettuce it increased with NPs via foliar application (p < 0.05). Lettuce plants, treated with Fe 3 O 4 NPs (500 ppm) via drenching increased chlorophyll and β-carotene content (p < 0.05). ZnO and Fe 3 O 4 NPs reduced H 2 O 2 content by 38 % and MDA by 35 %, respectively, while promoting proline by 14 %. RuBisCO increased with 250 ppm of ZnO NPs applied via foliar application in both crops, with the greatest increase documented in cucumber (50 %). No differences were observed in Fe and Zn accumulation. However, 100 ppm of Fe 3 O 4 NPs via drenching increased Fe content by 80 %, and 250 ppm of ZnO NPs via foliar application increased Zn content by 26 %, compared to the control. For lettuce, high doses of Fe 3 O 4 NPs and ZnO NPs via foliar application increased Fe and Zn content by 26 % and 45 %, respectively. The foliar-applied NPs showed the greatest accumulation, without inducing toxicity. Therefore, they are a potential tool for agronomic bioenrichment of lettuce and cucumber.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In cucumbers, chlorophylls, β-carotene and yellow pigments responded favorably to drenching with 100 ppm Fe3O4 NPs.

Taxon
cucumbersCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
drenching with of 100 ppm Fe 3 O 4 NPse1
Outcome
chlorophylls, β-carotene, and yellow pigmentse1
Direction
responded favorablye1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In cucumbers, chlorophylls, β-carotene, and yellow pigments responded favorably (p < 0.01) to drenching with of 100 ppm Fe 3 O 4 NPs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1096 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar application of 100 ppm Fe3O4 NPs significantly increased βCA activity in cucumber.

Taxon
cucumbersCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
foliar applicatione2
Outcome
βCA activitye2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In cucumbers, chlorophylls, β-carotene, and yellow pigments responded favorably (p < 0.01) to drenching with of 100 ppm Fe 3 O 4 NPs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1096 · show in text ↑
e2

“The same treatment but via foliar application significantly increased βCA activity and decreased proline, H 2 O 2 , and MDA content by 15.2 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1239 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar application of 100 ppm Fe3O4 NPs decreased proline, H2O2 and MDA content by 15.2 % in cucumber.

Taxon
cucumbersCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
foliar applicatione2
Outcome
proline, H 2 O 2 , and MDA contente2
Direction
decreasede2
Value
15.2 %e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In cucumbers, chlorophylls, β-carotene, and yellow pigments responded favorably (p < 0.01) to drenching with of 100 ppm Fe 3 O 4 NPs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1096 · show in text ↑
e2

“The same treatment but via foliar application significantly increased βCA activity and decreased proline, H 2 O 2 , and MDA content by 15.2 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1239 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Vitamin C increased with ionic forms applied by drenching.

Taxon
lettuce and cucumberCucumis sativusLactuca sativat0
Treatment
ionic forms via drenchinge3
Outcome
vitamin Ce3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lettuce and cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–114 · show in text ↑
e3

“In contrast, vitamin C increased (p < 0.05) with ionic forms via drenching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1315 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In lettuce, vitamin C increased with nanoparticles applied by foliar application.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae4
Treatment
NPs via foliar applicatione4
Outcome
vitamin Ce3
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“In contrast, vitamin C increased (p < 0.05) with ionic forms via drenching”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1315 · show in text ↑
e4

“however, in lettuce it increased with NPs via foliar application (p < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1317–1392 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lettuce treated with 500 ppm Fe3O4 NPs by drenching had higher chlorophyll and β-carotene content.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativae5
Treatment
Fe 3 O 4 NPs (500 ppm) via drenchinge5
Outcome
chlorophyll and β-carotene contente5
Direction
increasede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Lettuce plants, treated with Fe 3 O 4 NPs (500 ppm) via drenching increased chlorophyll and β-carotene content (p < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1394–1515 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZnO NPs reduced H2O2 content by 38 %.

Taxon
lettuce and cucumberCucumis sativusLactuca sativat0
Treatment
ZnOe6
Outcome
H 2 O 2 contente6
Direction
reducede6
Value
38 %e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lettuce and cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–114 · show in text ↑
e6

“ZnO and Fe 3 O 4 NPs reduced H 2 O 2 content by 38 % and MDA by 35 %, respectively, while promoting proline by 14 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1517–1632 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fe3O4 NPs reduced MDA content by 35 %.

Taxon
lettuce and cucumberCucumis sativusLactuca sativat0
Treatment
Fe 3 O 4e6
Outcome
MDAe6
Direction
reducede6
Value
35 %e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lettuce and cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–114 · show in text ↑
e6

“ZnO and Fe 3 O 4 NPs reduced H 2 O 2 content by 38 % and MDA by 35 %, respectively, while promoting proline by 14 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1517–1632 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ZnO and Fe3O4 NPs promoted proline by 14 %.

Taxon
lettuce and cucumberCucumis sativusLactuca sativat0
Treatment
ZnO and Fe 3 O 4 NPse6
Outcome
prolinee6
Direction
promotinge6
Value
14 %e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lettuce and cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–114 · show in text ↑
e6

“ZnO and Fe 3 O 4 NPs reduced H 2 O 2 content by 38 % and MDA by 35 %, respectively, while promoting proline by 14 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1517–1632 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RuBisCO increased with 250 ppm ZnO NPs applied by foliar application in both crops.

Taxon
lettuce and cucumberCucumis sativusLactuca sativat0
Treatment
250 ppm of ZnO NPs applied via foliar applicatione7
Outcome
RuBisCOe7
Direction
increasede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lettuce and cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–114 · show in text ↑
e7

“RuBisCO increased with 250 ppm of ZnO NPs applied via foliar application in both crops, with the greatest increase documented in cucumber (50 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1634–1778 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The greatest RuBisCO increase under 250 ppm ZnO NPs by foliar application was 50 % in cucumber.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse7
Treatment
250 ppm of ZnO NPs applied via foliar applicatione7
Outcome
RuBisCOe7
Direction
greatest increasee7
Value
50 %e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“RuBisCO increased with 250 ppm of ZnO NPs applied via foliar application in both crops, with the greatest increase documented in cucumber (50 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1634–1778 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No differences were observed in Fe and Zn accumulation.

Taxon
lettuce and cucumberCucumis sativusLactuca sativat0
Outcome
Fe and Zn accumulatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lettuce and cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–114 · show in text ↑
e1

“No differences were observed in Fe and Zn accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1780–1834 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drenching with 100 ppm Fe3O4 NPs increased Fe content by 80 % compared with control.

Taxon
lettuce and cucumberCucumis sativusLactuca sativat0
Treatment
100 ppm of Fe 3 O 4 NPs via drenchinge2
Outcome
Fe contente2
Direction
increasede2
Value
80 %e2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lettuce and cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–114 · show in text ↑
e2

“However, 100 ppm of Fe 3 O 4 NPs via drenching increased Fe content by 80 %, and 250 ppm of ZnO NPs via foliar application increased Zn content by 26 %, compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1836–2012 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar application of 250 ppm ZnO NPs increased Zn content by 26 % compared with control.

Taxon
lettuce and cucumberCucumis sativusLactuca sativat0
Treatment
250 ppm of ZnO NPs via foliar applicatione2
Outcome
Zn contente2
Direction
increasede2
Value
26 %e2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lettuce and cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–114 · show in text ↑
e2

“However, 100 ppm of Fe 3 O 4 NPs via drenching increased Fe content by 80 %, and 250 ppm of ZnO NPs via foliar application increased Zn content by 26 %, compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1836–2012 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In lettuce, high doses of Fe3O4 and ZnO NPs by foliar application increased Fe content by 26 %.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae1
Treatment
high doses of Fe 3 O 4 NPs and ZnO NPs via foliar applicatione1
Outcome
Fee1
Direction
increasede1
Value
26 %e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lettuce and cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–114 · show in text ↑
e1

“For lettuce, high doses of Fe 3 O 4 NPs and ZnO NPs via foliar application increased Fe and Zn content by 26 % and 45 %, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2014–2147 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In lettuce, high doses of Fe3O4 and ZnO NPs by foliar application increased Zn content by 45 %.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae1
Treatment
high doses of Fe 3 O 4 NPs and ZnO NPs via foliar applicatione1
Outcome
Zne1
Direction
increasede1
Value
45 %e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lettuce and cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–114 · show in text ↑
e1

“For lettuce, high doses of Fe 3 O 4 NPs and ZnO NPs via foliar application increased Fe and Zn content by 26 % and 45 %, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2014–2147 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar-applied NPs gave the greatest accumulation without toxicity.

Taxon
lettuce and cucumberCucumis sativusLactuca sativat0
Treatment
foliar-applied NPse1
Outcome
accumulatione1
Direction
greateste1
Qualifier
without inducing toxicitye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“lettuce and cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–114 · show in text ↑
e1

“The foliar-applied NPs showed the greatest accumulation, without inducing toxicity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2149–2231 · show in text ↑

iron atom · physiology: oxidative · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

iron atom · physiology: oxidative · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

zinc oxide · nutrient: content · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

iron atom · physiology: pigments · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

iron atom · physiology: pigments · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

iron atom · nutrient: content · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

iron atom · nutrient: content · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 8 positive, 4 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

zinc oxide · physiology: oxidative · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

8 of 27 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.