Paper · 2025 · Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer

Evaluation of nitrogen dynamics under different nitrogen application levels in red pepper fields

Yunsik Shin; Jong-Mun Lee; Hye-Ran Park; et al.

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Excessive nitrogen (N) fertilization in agriculture leads to substantial nitrogen losses through ammonia (NH 3 ) volatilization, nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emissions, and nitrate (NO 3 -) leaching.To address N overuse and establish appropriate fertilizer management strategies, a comprehensive evaluation of N dynamics through different pathways including plant uptake, gaseous emissions and leaching.Therefore, this study evaluated N dynamics in red pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) fields under four N application rates (0, 228, 342, and 456 kg N ha -1 ).As a result, the cumulative emissions of NH 3 and N 2 O ranged from 0.97 to 17.56 kg NH 3 ha -1 and 0.69 to 9.92 kg N 2 O ha -1 , respectively, increasing clearly with higher nitrogen input.The 228 kg N ha -1 treatment showed a more balanced nitrogen distribution, with the highest crop N uptake (262.9 kg N ha -1 ) and the lowest total N loss (29.5 kg N ha -1 ).In contrast, N uptake decreased by 21.5% and 46.6% in the 342 and 456 kg N ha -1 treatments, while nitrogen losses to the atmosphere and water pathways increased more than twofold.These results show that excessive N input reduces N use efficiency and shifts N flow toward environmental losses rather than crop uptake.Although some monitoring gaps occurred and nitrate leaching was estimated empirically due to practical constraints in field management, the overall pattern of nitrogen partitioning among treatments was consistent.These findings provide a quantitative baseline that captures the shift in N flow and loss structures across fertilization levels, offering a valuable reference for future N budgeting, modeling, and management framework development in red pepper cultivation systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonia emissions ranged from 0.97 to 17.56 kg per hectare and increased with nitrogen input.

Treatment
four N application rates (0, 228, 342, and 456 kg N ha -1 )e0
Outcome
emissions of NH 3e1
Direction
increasinge1
Value
0.97 to 17.56 kg NH 3 ha -1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum var. annuum
Capsicum annuum var. annuum · TaxonNikodem Nijaki · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“red pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) fields under four N application rates (0, 228, 342, and 456 kg N ha -1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–546 · show in text ↑
e1

“cumulative emissions of NH 3 and N 2 O ranged from 0.97 to 17.56 kg NH 3 ha -1 and 0.69 to 9.92 kg N 2 O ha -1 , respectively, increasing clearly with higher nitrogen input”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 564–736 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrous oxide emissions ranged from 0.69 to 9.92 kg per hectare and increased with nitrogen input.

Treatment
four N application rates (0, 228, 342, and 456 kg N ha -1 )e0
Outcome
emissions of NH 3 and N 2 Oe1
Direction
increasinge1
Value
0.69 to 9.92 kg N 2 O ha -1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum var. annuum
Capsicum annuum var. annuum · TaxonNikodem Nijaki · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“red pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) fields under four N application rates (0, 228, 342, and 456 kg N ha -1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–546 · show in text ↑
e1

“cumulative emissions of NH 3 and N 2 O ranged from 0.97 to 17.56 kg NH 3 ha -1 and 0.69 to 9.92 kg N 2 O ha -1 , respectively, increasing clearly with higher nitrogen input”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 564–736 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 228 kg N ha -1 treatment had the highest crop N uptake, 262.9 kg N ha -1.

Treatment
228 kg N ha -1e1
Outcome
crop N uptakee1
Direction
higheste1
Value
262.9 kg N ha -1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum var. annuum
Capsicum annuum var. annuum · TaxonNikodem Nijaki · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“red pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–480 · show in text ↑
e1

“The 228 kg N ha -1 treatment showed a more balanced nitrogen distribution, with the highest crop N uptake (262.9 kg N ha -1 ) and the lowest total N loss (29.5 kg N ha -1 ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–910 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 228 kg N ha -1 treatment had the lowest total N loss, 29.5 kg N ha -1.

Treatment
228 kg N ha -1e1
Outcome
total N losse1
Direction
loweste1
Value
29.5 kg N ha -1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum var. annuum
Capsicum annuum var. annuum · TaxonNikodem Nijaki · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“red pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–480 · show in text ↑
e1

“The 228 kg N ha -1 treatment showed a more balanced nitrogen distribution, with the highest crop N uptake (262.9 kg N ha -1 ) and the lowest total N loss (29.5 kg N ha -1 ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–910 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N uptake decreased by 21.5% with 342 kg N ha -1.

Treatment
342e1
Outcome
N uptakee1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
21.5%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum var. annuum
Capsicum annuum var. annuum · TaxonNikodem Nijaki · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“red pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–480 · show in text ↑
e1

“N uptake decreased by 21.5% and 46.6% in the 342 and 456 kg N ha -1 treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–1001 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N uptake decreased by 46.6% with 456 kg N ha -1.

Treatment
456 kg N ha -1e1
Outcome
N uptakee1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
46.6%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum var. annuum
Capsicum annuum var. annuum · TaxonNikodem Nijaki · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“red pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–480 · show in text ↑
e1

“N uptake decreased by 21.5% and 46.6% in the 342 and 456 kg N ha -1 treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 923–1001 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen losses to atmosphere and water increased more than twofold under the 342 and 456 kg N ha -1 treatments.

Treatment
342 and 456 kg N ha -1 treatmentse2
Outcome
nitrogen losses to the atmosphere and water pathwayse1
Direction
increasede1
Value
more than twofolde1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum var. annuum
Capsicum annuum var. annuum · TaxonNikodem Nijaki · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“red pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–480 · show in text ↑
e1

“nitrogen losses to the atmosphere and water pathways increased more than twofold”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1089 · show in text ↑
e2

“342 and 456 kg N ha -1 treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–1001 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Excessive N input reduced N use efficiency.

Treatment
excessive N inpute1
Outcome
N use efficiencye1
Direction
reducese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum var. annuum
Capsicum annuum var. annuum · TaxonNikodem Nijaki · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“red pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–480 · show in text ↑
e1

“excessive N input reduces N use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1114–1156 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.