Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The 228 kg N ha -1 treatment had the lowest total N loss, 29.5 kg N ha -1.

A claim from Evaluation of nitrogen dynamics under different nitrogen application levels in red pepper fields · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 228 kg N ha -1 treatment had the lowest total N loss, 29.5 kg N ha -1.

Treatment
228 kg N ha -1e1
Outcome
total N losse1
Direction
loweste1
Value
29.5 kg N ha -1e1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum var. annuum
Capsicum annuum var. annuum · TaxonNikodem Nijaki · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“red pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–480
e1

“The 228 kg N ha -1 treatment showed a more balanced nitrogen distribution, with the highest crop N uptake (262.9 kg N ha -1 ) and the lowest total N loss (29.5 kg N ha -1 ).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–910

Title

Evaluation of nitrogen dynamics under different nitrogen application levels in red pepper fields

Yunsik Shin; Jong-Mun Lee; Hye-Ran Park; et al. Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer 2025. doi:10.7745/kjssf.2025.58.4.510

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-7be7b679e1f4b9cf68b0d7b86cf6c7321cfdf5c940bfdf1c820af5c4bf7eb23e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.