Paper · 2025 · Restoration Ecology

Seed pretreatment length when producing seeds for restoration may impact seed dormancy in offspring

Marcello De Vitis; Kayri Havens; Linda MacKechnie; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Seed dormancy regulates germination timing to improve seedling survival. Many temperate species produce physiologically dormant seeds, requiring winter conditions (i.e. moist‐cold stratification) to overcome dormancy. Exposing seeds to suboptimal stratification lengths for restoration may alter genetic diversity and/or stratification requirements in offspring. Objectives We investigate how the moist‐cold stratification length seeds are exposed to impacts on germination in offspring and whether variation in seed dormancy is under genetic and/or environmental control, with implications for producing and using germplasm for restoration. Methods For one population of each of three Viola species, we created two F0 subpopulations using short versus long moist‐cold stratification. Resulting plants were grown in a common environment for two generations, with germination proportion and rate quantified under short, long, and no moist‐cold stratification treatments. We also assessed the proportion of variation in germination explained by genotype and the interaction between genotype and environment. Results Moist‐cold stratification length significantly impacted germination in all study species, but transgenerational effects were limited: germination proportion was greater in one species but only when F0 and F1 seeds were exposed to shorter stratification, while germination rate was two to three times slower in another species, but varied by subpopulation. Between 10 and 22% of variation in germination was explained by genotype and its interaction with the environment. Conclusions The length of moist‐cold stratification seeds with physiological dormancy is exposed to in production may alter how restored populations perform. Species producing seeds with deeper dormancy may be more likely to be impacted.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Moist-cold stratification length significantly affected germination in all three Viola species.

Taxon
ViolaViolae0
Treatment
stratification lengthe1
Outcome
germinatione1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Viola
Viola · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)H. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For one population of each of three Viola species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–721 · show in text ↑
e1

“Moist‐cold stratification length significantly impacted germination in all study species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1224 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transgenerational effects of stratification length on germination in Viola were limited.

Taxon
ViolaViolae0
Outcome
transgenerational effectse2
Qualifier
limitede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Viola
Viola · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)H. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For one population of each of three Viola species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–721 · show in text ↑
e2

“transgenerational effects were limited”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1268 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In one Viola species, germination proportion was greater only when F0 and F1 seeds were exposed to shorter stratification.

Taxon
ViolaViolae0
Organ / stage
F0 and F1 seedse3
Treatment
shorter stratificatione3
Outcome
germination proportione3
Direction
greatere3
Qualifier
in one speciese3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Viola
Viola · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)H. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For one population of each of three Viola species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–721 · show in text ↑
e3

“germination proportion was greater in one species but only when F0 and F1 seeds were exposed to shorter stratification”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1388 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In another Viola species, germination rate was two to three times slower.

Taxon
ViolaViolae0
Outcome
germination ratee4
Value
two to three timese4
Qualifier
in another speciese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Viola
Viola · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)H. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For one population of each of three Viola species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–721 · show in text ↑
e4

“germination rate was two to three times slower in another species, but varied by subpopulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1396–1490 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Germination rate in Viola varied by subpopulation.

Taxon
ViolaViolae0
Outcome
germination ratee4
Qualifier
varied by subpopulatione4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Viola
Viola · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)H. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For one population of each of three Viola species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–721 · show in text ↑
e4

“germination rate was two to three times slower in another species, but varied by subpopulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1396–1490 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype and its interaction with environment explained 10 to 22% of the variation in germination in Viola.

Taxon
ViolaViolae0
Material
genotypee5
Outcome
variation in germinatione5
Value
10 and 22%e5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Viola
Viola · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)H. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For one population of each of three Viola species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–721 · show in text ↑
e5

“Between 10 and 22% of variation in germination was explained by genotype and its interaction with the environment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1492–1605 · show in text ↑
Associationhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Viola species producing seeds with deeper dormancy may be more likely to be impacted by stratification length in restored populations.

Taxon
ViolaViolae0
Organ / stage
seeds with deeper dormancye6
Outcome
impactede6
Direction
more likelye6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Viola
Viola · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)H. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For one population of each of three Viola species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–721 · show in text ↑
e6

“Species producing seeds with deeper dormancy may be more likely to be impacted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1765–1843 · show in text ↑

seed treatment · growth · ViolaResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.