Viola 205 claims

Claim · model-written summary

Secondary local extinction risk of Viola spp. increases with latitude under future climate change, posing a greater threat to plant-bee pollinator networks at northern latitudes.

Taxon

Viola spp.Violae1

Interactor

beeApis melliferae1pollinator

Outcome

Secondary local extinction riske1

Direction

increasese1

Setting

northern latitudese1

Verbatim

e1

“Secondary local extinction risk of Viola spp. increases with latitude, indicating that future climate change will pose a greater threat to plant–bee pollinator networks at northern latitudes”

Claim · model-written summary

The sensitivity of secondary local extinction risk to phenological mismatch with generalist and specialist bee pollinators varies by latitude.

Taxon

Viola spp.Violae1

Treatment

phenological mismatche2

Interactor

generalist and specialist bee pollinatorse2pollinator

Outcome

sensitivity of secondary local extinction riske2

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e1

“Secondary local extinction risk of Viola spp. increases with latitude, indicating that future climate change will pose a greater threat to plant–bee pollinator networks at northern latitudes”

e2

“Additionally, the sensitivity of secondary local extinction risk to phenological mismatch with both generalist and specialist bee pollinators varies by latitude, with specialist bees showing a sharper decline at higher latitudes”

Claim · model-written summary

The sensitivity of secondary local extinction risk to phenological mismatch with specialist bees showed a sharper decline at higher latitudes.

Taxon

Viola spp.Violae1

Treatment

phenological mismatche2

Interactor

specialist beese2pollinator

Outcome

sensitivity of secondary local extinction riske2

Direction

sharper declinee2

Setting

higher latitudese2

Verbatim

e1

“Secondary local extinction risk of Viola spp. increases with latitude, indicating that future climate change will pose a greater threat to plant–bee pollinator networks at northern latitudes”

e2

“Additionally, the sensitivity of secondary local extinction risk to phenological mismatch with both generalist and specialist bee pollinators varies by latitude, with specialist bees showing a sharper decline at higher latitudes”

Claim · model-written summary

Conservation priorities based solely on primary extinction risk may be insufficient to support self-sustaining populations of Viola spp.

Taxon

Viola spp.Violae1

Outcome

conservation priorities based solely on primary extinction riske2

Verbatim

e1

“Secondary local extinction risk of Viola spp. increases with latitude, indicating that future climate change will pose a greater threat to plant–bee pollinator networks at northern latitudes”

e2

“Our findings demonstrate that existing conservation priorities based solely on primary extinction risk directly caused by climate change may be insufficient to support self-sustaining populations of plants”

Claim · model-written summary

Secondary extinction risk from plant-pollinator mismatch should be incorporated into future global conservation frameworks.

Taxon

Viola spp.Violae1

Outcome

incorporating secondary extinction riske2

Verbatim

e1

“Secondary local extinction risk of Viola spp. increases with latitude, indicating that future climate change will pose a greater threat to plant–bee pollinator networks at northern latitudes”

e2

“incorporating secondary extinction risk resulting from ecological mismatches between plants and pollinators into future global conservation frameworks should be carefully considered”

Claim · model-written summary

Moist-cold stratification length significantly affected germination in all three Viola species.

Taxon

ViolaViolae0

Treatment

stratification lengthe1

Outcome

germinatione1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“For one population of each of three Viola species”

e1

“Moist‐cold stratification length significantly impacted germination in all study species”

Claim · model-written summary

Transgenerational effects of stratification length on germination in Viola were limited.

Taxon

ViolaViolae0

Outcome

transgenerational effectse2

Qualifier

limitede2

Verbatim

e0

“For one population of each of three Viola species”

e2

“transgenerational effects were limited”

Claim · model-written summary

In one Viola species, germination proportion was greater only when F0 and F1 seeds were exposed to shorter stratification.

Taxon

ViolaViolae0

Organ / stage

F0 and F1 seedse3

Treatment

shorter stratificatione3

Outcome

germination proportione3

Direction

greatere3

Qualifier

in one speciese3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“For one population of each of three Viola species”

e3

“germination proportion was greater in one species but only when F0 and F1 seeds were exposed to shorter stratification”

Claim · model-written summary

In another Viola species, germination rate was two to three times slower.

Taxon

ViolaViolae0

Outcome

germination ratee4

Value

two to three timese4

Qualifier

in another speciese4

Verbatim

e0

“For one population of each of three Viola species”

e4

“germination rate was two to three times slower in another species, but varied by subpopulation”

Claim · model-written summary

Germination rate in Viola varied by subpopulation.

Taxon

ViolaViolae0

Outcome

germination ratee4

Qualifier

varied by subpopulatione4

Verbatim

e0

“For one population of each of three Viola species”

e4

“germination rate was two to three times slower in another species, but varied by subpopulation”