Paper · 2025 · Agronomy

Effects of Microalgae Biomass (Nannochloropsis gaditana and Thalassiosira sp.) on Wheat Seed Germination at High Temperature

Liliana Guadalupe Alfaro Sifuentes; Gabriel Iván Romero Villegas; Alberto Sánchez Estrada; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Agricultural inputs based on microalgae have been successfully tested at different stages of the crop cycle, from sowing to harvest, to enhance crop performance. In this study, biomass from Nannochloropsis gaditana and Thalassiosira sp. was obtained to evaluate its effect on wheat seed germination under two temperature conditions. Microalgal biomass was produced under controlled conditions (neutral pH, air flow of 1 L·min−1, and a dilution rate of 0.2 day−1). The biomass was characterized for its lipid, carbohydrate, protein, and ash content. Subsequently, its effect on germination, as well as on glucose and amylose content in wheat seedlings, was assessed. Four biomass concentrations were tested (0.0 [distilled water], 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 g·L−1) at two incubation temperatures (25 and 35 °C). Results showed that Thalassiosira sp. lightly promoted the germination rate more than N. gaditana. Germination parameters were negatively affected by high temperature, but treatments with Thalassiosira sp. alleviated this effect, showing values comparable to those obtained at the optimal temperature. Vigor parameters were improved compared with the control in both temperatures. Glucose and amylose contents exhibited irregular but consistent patterns. However, at a temperature of 35 °C, a slight conversion of starch to glucose could be observed. Overall, microalgal biomass did not significantly improve germination or its time variables, but it could exert a protective effect against high-temperature stress, particularly in the case of Thalassiosira sp.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thalassiosira promoted wheat germination rate slightly more than N. gaditana.

Treatment
Thalassiosira sp.e0
Interactor
Thalassiosira sp.Thalassiosirae0other
Outcome
germination ratee0
Direction
more thane0
Comparator
N. gaditanae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thalassiosira sp. lightly promoted the germination rate more than N. gaditana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–899 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High temperature negatively affected wheat germination parameters.

Treatment
high temperaturee0
Outcome
Germination parameterse0
Direction
negatively affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Germination parameters were negatively affected by high temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–968 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thalassiosira treatments alleviated high-temperature effects on wheat germination.

Treatment
Thalassiosira sp.e0
Interactor
Thalassiosira sp.Thalassiosirae0other
Outcome
valuese0
Direction
alleviatede0
Comparator
optimal temperaturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatments with Thalassiosira sp. alleviated this effect, showing values comparable to those obtained at the optimal temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1102 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microalgal treatments improved wheat seedling vigor compared with controls at both temperatures.

Outcome
Vigor parameterse0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
both temperaturese0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Vigor parameters were improved compared with the control in both temperatures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1181 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat seedling glucose and amylose contents showed irregular but consistent patterns.

Outcome
Glucose and amylose contentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glucose and amylose contents exhibited irregular but consistent patterns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1255 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 35 °C, wheat seedlings showed slight starch-to-glucose conversion.

Outcome
conversion of starch to glucosee0
Qualifier
35 °Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at a temperature of 35 °C, a slight conversion of starch to glucose could be observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1266–1351 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Overall, microalgal biomass did not significantly improve wheat germination or timing.

Treatment
microalgal biomasse0
Outcome
germination or its time variablese0
Direction
did not significantly improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“microalgal biomass did not significantly improve germination or its time variables”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1362–1444 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–87 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest biomass, especially Thalassiosira, could protect wheat from heat stress.

Interactor
Thalassiosira sp.Thalassiosirae0other
Outcome
protective effect against high-temperature stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it could exert a protective effect against high-temperature stress, particularly in the case of Thalassiosira sp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1563 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–87 · show in text ↑

heat · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

131 papers: 42 positive, 89 negative or no effect

88 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

127 papers more in this group

See all 131 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.