Paper · 2008 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Effects of sulphur in presence and absence of farmyard manure on onion (Allium cepa) under onion-maize (Zea mays) cropping sequence

S. K. Raina; R. C. Jaggi

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
6
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Field experiment conducted during 2003-06 to study the effects of 4 (0, 15, 30 and 45 kg/ha.) S levels in the absence and presence of 25 tonnes farmyard manure/ha in onion (Allium cepa L.) - maize (Zea mays L.) system. The results show the positive effects of 30 kg S/ha on bulb yield over the previous levels of 0 and 15 kg/ha (direct effect). Addition of sulphur beyond 30 kg/ha brought the yield to the level of 0 and 15 kg/ha. Application of farmyard manure @ 25 tonnes/ha significantly increased bulb and foliage yield. Sulphur-farmyard manure interaction was positive at low and negative at higher levels of S. Highest yield (yield) was observed either in treatment combination of 25 tonnes farmyard manure/ha without S or 30 kg S/ha without farmyard manure. Plant height significantly increased only by farmyard manure (from 57.4-59.1 cm) over without farmyard manure. In maize (residual effect) and also in onion-maize sequence as a whole (direct + residual effects) the same trend was visible except that the sulphur-farmyard manure interaction was significant only in the later. Sulphur addition beyond 30 kg/ha brought down the total economic yield and also the foliage yield of both the crops to the level of either 15 kg S/ha or even control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur at 30 kg/ha increased bulb yield positively over 0 and 15 kg/ha (direct effect).

Taxon
onionAllium cepae1
Treatment
30 kg S/hae2
Outcome
bulb yielde2
Direction
positive effectse2
Comparator
0 and 15 kg/hae2
Setting
Field experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Field experiment conducted during 2003-06”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–41 · show in text ↑
e1

“in onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 163–188 · show in text ↑
e2

“The results show the positive effects of 30 kg S/ha on bulb yield over the previous levels of 0 and 15 kg/ha (direct effect)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 219–343 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur beyond 30 kg/ha brought the onion yield back to the level of 0 and 15 kg/ha.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae1
Treatment
Addition of sulphur beyond 30 kg/hae3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
no_changeinferrede3
Comparator
0 and 15 kg/hae3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“in onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 163–188 · show in text ↑
e3

“Addition of sulphur beyond 30 kg/ha brought the yield to the level of 0 and 15 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 345–429 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmyard manure at 25 tonnes/ha significantly increased onion bulb and foliage yield relative to no manure.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae1
Treatment
farmyard manure @ 25 tonnes/hae4
Outcome
bulb and foliage yielde4
Direction
increasede4
Comparator
without farmyard manuree7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“in onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 163–188 · show in text ↑
e4

“Application of farmyard manure @ 25 tonnes/ha significantly increased bulb and foliage yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–523 · show in text ↑
e7

“over without farmyard manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–874 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The sulphur-farmyard manure interaction was positive at low sulphur levels.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae1
Treatment
lowe5
Outcome
Sulphur-farmyard manure interactione5
Direction
positivee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“in onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 163–188 · show in text ↑
e5

“Sulphur-farmyard manure interaction was positive at low and negative at higher levels of S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–615 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The sulphur-farmyard manure interaction was negative at higher sulphur levels.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae1
Treatment
higher levels of Se5
Outcome
Sulphur-farmyard manure interactione5
Direction
negativee5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“in onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 163–188 · show in text ↑
e5

“Sulphur-farmyard manure interaction was positive at low and negative at higher levels of S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–615 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest onion yield was observed with 25 tonnes farmyard manure/ha without sulphur.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae1
Treatment
25 tonnes farmyard manure/ha without Se6
Outcome
Highest yielde6
Direction
Higheste6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“in onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 163–188 · show in text ↑
e6

“Highest yield (yield) was observed either in treatment combination of 25 tonnes farmyard manure/ha without S or 30 kg S/ha without farmyard manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–763 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest onion yield was observed with 30 kg S/ha without farmyard manure.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae1
Treatment
30 kg S/ha without farmyard manuree6
Outcome
Highest yielde6
Direction
Higheste6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“in onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 163–188 · show in text ↑
e6

“Highest yield (yield) was observed either in treatment combination of 25 tonnes farmyard manure/ha without S or 30 kg S/ha without farmyard manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–763 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Farmyard manure significantly increased onion plant height, from 57.4-59.1 cm, over no manure.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae1
Treatment
farmyard manuree7
Outcome
Plant heighte7
Direction
increasede7
Value
57.4-59.1 cme7
Comparator
without farmyard manuree7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“in onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 163–188 · show in text ↑
e7

“Plant height significantly increased only by farmyard manure (from 57.4-59.1 cm) over without farmyard manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–874 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The sulphur-farmyard manure interaction was significant only for the onion-maize sequence as a whole, not for the maize residual effect.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse6
Treatment
sulphur-farmyard manuree6
Outcome
interactione6
Qualifier
onion-maize sequence as a wholee6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“In maize (residual effect) and also in onion-maize sequence as a whole (direct + residual effects) the same trend was visible except that the sulphur-farmyard manure interaction was significant only in the later”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1087 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same yield trend seen for the direct effect was visible in maize as a residual effect.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse6
Outcome
the same trende6
Qualifier
residual effecte6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“In maize (residual effect) and also in onion-maize sequence as a whole (direct + residual effects) the same trend was visible except that the sulphur-farmyard manure interaction was significant only in the later”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1087 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur beyond 30 kg/ha reduced total economic yield and foliage yield of both crops to the level of 15 kg S/ha or control.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae1
Treatment
Sulphur addition beyond 30 kg/hae2
Outcome
total economic yield and also the foliage yielde2
Direction
brought downe2
Comparator
15 kg S/hae2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“in onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 163–188 · show in text ↑
e2

“Sulphur addition beyond 30 kg/ha brought down the total economic yield and also the foliage yield of both the crops to the level of either 15 kg S/ha or even control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1254 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

45 papers: 38 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 38 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Combined 30 kg/ha sulphur and 100 ppm GA3 gave maximum onion bulb yield of 17.10 t/ha.

    EFFECT OF SULPHUR AND GA3 ON THE GROWTH AND YIELD OF ONION · 2010 · compared with control treatment of sulphur with GA3

    Opposite directionCites this paper

  2. positive
  3. positive

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

fertilization · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

294 papers: 251 positive, 43 negative or no effect

250 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

290 papers more in this group

See all 294 papers →

fertilization · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

530 papers: 464 positive, 66 negative or no effect

463 papers in the same direction as this paper · 59 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

526 papers more in this group

See all 530 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.