Abstract
Field experiment conducted during 2003-06 to study the effects of 4 (0, 15, 30 and 45 kg/ha.) S levels in the absence and presence of 25 tonnes farmyard manure/ha in onion (Allium cepa L.) - maize (Zea mays L.) system. The results show the positive effects of 30 kg S/ha on bulb yield over the previous levels of 0 and 15 kg/ha (direct effect). Addition of sulphur beyond 30 kg/ha brought the yield to the level of 0 and 15 kg/ha. Application of farmyard manure @ 25 tonnes/ha significantly increased bulb and foliage yield. Sulphur-farmyard manure interaction was positive at low and negative at higher levels of S. Highest yield (yield) was observed either in treatment combination of 25 tonnes farmyard manure/ha without S or 30 kg S/ha without farmyard manure. Plant height significantly increased only by farmyard manure (from 57.4-59.1 cm) over without farmyard manure. In maize (residual effect) and also in onion-maize sequence as a whole (direct + residual effects) the same trend was visible except that the sulphur-farmyard manure interaction was significant only in the later. Sulphur addition beyond 30 kg/ha brought down the total economic yield and also the foliage yield of both the crops to the level of either 15 kg S/ha or even control.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Sulphur at 30 kg/ha increased bulb yield positively over 0 and 15 kg/ha (direct effect).
- Taxon
- onion
Allium cepae1 - Treatment
- 30 kg S/hae2
- Outcome
- bulb yielde2
- Direction
- positive effectse2
- Comparator
- 0 and 15 kg/hae2
- Setting
- Field experimente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Field experiment conducted during 2003-06”
e1“in onion (Allium cepa L.)”
e2“The results show the positive effects of 30 kg S/ha on bulb yield over the previous levels of 0 and 15 kg/ha (direct effect)”
Claim · model-written summary
Sulphur beyond 30 kg/ha brought the onion yield back to the level of 0 and 15 kg/ha.
- Taxon
- onion
Allium cepae1 - Treatment
- Addition of sulphur beyond 30 kg/hae3
- Outcome
- yielde3
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede3
- Comparator
- 0 and 15 kg/hae3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“in onion (Allium cepa L.)”
e3“Addition of sulphur beyond 30 kg/ha brought the yield to the level of 0 and 15 kg/ha”
Claim · model-written summary
Farmyard manure at 25 tonnes/ha significantly increased onion bulb and foliage yield relative to no manure.
- Taxon
- onion
Allium cepae1 - Treatment
- farmyard manure @ 25 tonnes/hae4
- Outcome
- bulb and foliage yielde4
- Direction
- increasede4
- Comparator
- without farmyard manuree7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“in onion (Allium cepa L.)”
e4“Application of farmyard manure @ 25 tonnes/ha significantly increased bulb and foliage yield”
e7“over without farmyard manure”
Claim · model-written summary
The sulphur-farmyard manure interaction was positive at low sulphur levels.
- Taxon
- onion
Allium cepae1 - Treatment
- lowe5
- Outcome
- Sulphur-farmyard manure interactione5
- Direction
- positivee5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“in onion (Allium cepa L.)”
e5“Sulphur-farmyard manure interaction was positive at low and negative at higher levels of S”
Claim · model-written summary
The sulphur-farmyard manure interaction was negative at higher sulphur levels.
- Taxon
- onion
Allium cepae1 - Treatment
- higher levels of Se5
- Outcome
- Sulphur-farmyard manure interactione5
- Direction
- negativee5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“in onion (Allium cepa L.)”
e5“Sulphur-farmyard manure interaction was positive at low and negative at higher levels of S”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest onion yield was observed with 25 tonnes farmyard manure/ha without sulphur.
- Taxon
- onion
Allium cepae1 - Treatment
- 25 tonnes farmyard manure/ha without Se6
- Outcome
- Highest yielde6
- Direction
- Higheste6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“in onion (Allium cepa L.)”
e6“Highest yield (yield) was observed either in treatment combination of 25 tonnes farmyard manure/ha without S or 30 kg S/ha without farmyard manure”
Claim · model-written summary
The highest onion yield was observed with 30 kg S/ha without farmyard manure.
- Taxon
- onion
Allium cepae1 - Treatment
- 30 kg S/ha without farmyard manuree6
- Outcome
- Highest yielde6
- Direction
- Higheste6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“in onion (Allium cepa L.)”
e6“Highest yield (yield) was observed either in treatment combination of 25 tonnes farmyard manure/ha without S or 30 kg S/ha without farmyard manure”
Claim · model-written summary
Farmyard manure significantly increased onion plant height, from 57.4-59.1 cm, over no manure.
- Taxon
- onion
Allium cepae1 - Treatment
- farmyard manuree7
- Outcome
- Plant heighte7
- Direction
- increasede7
- Value
- 57.4-59.1 cme7
- Comparator
- without farmyard manuree7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“in onion (Allium cepa L.)”
e7“Plant height significantly increased only by farmyard manure (from 57.4-59.1 cm) over without farmyard manure”
Claim · model-written summary
The sulphur-farmyard manure interaction was significant only for the onion-maize sequence as a whole, not for the maize residual effect.
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e6“In maize (residual effect) and also in onion-maize sequence as a whole (direct + residual effects) the same trend was visible except that the sulphur-farmyard manure interaction was significant only in the later”
Claim · model-written summary
The same yield trend seen for the direct effect was visible in maize as a residual effect.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e6“In maize (residual effect) and also in onion-maize sequence as a whole (direct + residual effects) the same trend was visible except that the sulphur-farmyard manure interaction was significant only in the later”
Claim · model-written summary
Sulphur beyond 30 kg/ha reduced total economic yield and foliage yield of both crops to the level of 15 kg S/ha or control.
- Taxon
- onion
Allium cepae1 - Treatment
- Sulphur addition beyond 30 kg/hae2
- Outcome
- total economic yield and also the foliage yielde2
- Direction
- brought downe2
- Comparator
- 15 kg S/hae2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“in onion (Allium cepa L.)”
e2“Sulphur addition beyond 30 kg/ha brought down the total economic yield and also the foliage yield of both the crops to the level of either 15 kg S/ha or even control”
The same questions in other papers
sulfur atom · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 38 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
41 papers more in this group
See all 45 papers →fertilization · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results
250 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
290 papers more in this group
See all 294 papers →fertilization · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results
463 papers in the same direction as this paper · 59 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
526 papers more in this group
See all 530 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.