Paper · 2012 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

An efficient and thermostable soluble starch synthase in developing maize (Zea mays) grains

RAKESH PANDEY; ANITA KUMARI; VIJAY PAUL; et al.

5
claims
6
verbatim quotes
4
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

High temperature during grain-filling stage is an important yield-limiting factor in wheat. It was reported earlier that a decrease in grain growth under high temperature is associated with a decrease in soluble starch synthase (SSS) activity, as this enzyme is extremely sensitive to high temperature. In attempt to identify thermostable SSS, a maize variety, in which grain development takes place under relatively warmer conditions, was compared with durum and aestivum wheat varieties in the present study. Maize was grown in rabi season so that grain development takes place in an increasing temperature as in wheat. The mean of maximum temperature during grain development period was highest for maize. In spite of such a high temperature exposure during grain development, the maize grains had a remarkably higher (3-4 times high) SSS activity as compared to wheat. Granule bound starch synthase (GBSS) activity was considerably lower than SSS activity, indicating SSS is the major enzyme for starch synthesis. High temperature exposure of excised developing grains showed no significant decrease in SSS activity in maize, whereas, T. aestivum var. Lok Bold showed a significant decrease. The present study reveals an efficient and relatively thermostable SSS in maize var. HQPM7 as compared to wheat, which could possibly be utilized in improving thermotolerance for grain growth in wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize grain had 3–4 times higher SSS activity than wheat despite high temperature during grain development.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Organ / stage
grainse0
Gene
SSSe0
Outcome
SSS activitye0
Direction
highere0
Value
3-4 times highe0
Comparator
wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the maize grains had a remarkably higher (3-4 times high) SSS activity as compared to wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–871 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GBSS activity was considerably lower than SSS activity.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Gene
Granule bound starch synthase (GBSS)e0
Outcome
Granule bound starch synthase (GBSS) activitye0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
SSS activitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Granule bound starch synthase (GBSS) activity was considerably lower than SSS activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–959 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays) grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High temperature exposure caused no significant decrease in SSS activity in excised developing maize grains.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Organ / stage
developing grainse0
Treatment
High temperature exposuree0
Gene
SSSe0
Outcome
SSS activitye0
Direction
no significant decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“High temperature exposure of excised developing grains showed no significant decrease in SSS activity in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1128 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High temperature exposure significantly decreased SSS activity in T. aestivum var. Lok Bold developing grain.

Taxon
T. aestivume0
Material
T. aestivum var. Lok Bolde0
Organ / stage
developing grainse0
Treatment
High temperature exposuree0
Outcome
SSS activitye0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“High temperature exposure of excised developing grains showed no significant decrease in SSS activity in maize, whereas, T. aestivum var. Lok Bold showed a significant decrease.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1195 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identify maize var. HQPM7 SSS as relatively thermostable compared with wheat.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Material
HQPM7e0
Gene
SSSe0
Outcome
relatively thermostable SSSe0
Comparator
wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an efficient and relatively thermostable SSS in maize var. HQPM7 as compared to wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1307 · show in text ↑

heat · quality: sugar starch · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

42 papers: 7 positive, 35 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

heat · quality: sugar starch · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 2 positive, 12 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.