Paper · 2010 · View

Effect of transpiration inhibitors on June fruit drop of apple trees.

Markus Kelderer; E. Lardschneider; A. Topp

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In organic apple growing, yield control is commonly achieved by removing buds and flowers with mechanical thinning machines and/or lime sulphur sprays. To allow for thinning also later in the season, trials with shading nets have been carried out over several years. By shading trees with close-meshed nets before June fruit drop, photosynthesis in the leaves can be drastically reduced. Regardless the good trial results, the method is not used in the field, because shading trees with nets is labour-intensive and expensive. We therefore tested different substances as alternatives to shading nets. First promising results were obtained with different oily substances. However, based on our current knowledge, negative side effects such as leaf burn and fruit russeting, can not be excluded.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading apple trees before June fruit drop drastically reduced leaf photosynthesis.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
shading trees with close-meshed netse0
Outcome
photosynthesis in the leavese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“By shading trees with close-meshed nets before June fruit drop, photosynthesis in the leaves can be drastically reduced.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 267–387 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–68 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trials with shading nets gave good results for apple thinning.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
shading trees with netse0
Outcome
good trial resultse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Regardless the good trial results, the method is not used in the field, because shading trees with nets is labour-intensive and expensive.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–526 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading nets are not used in the field because they are labour intensive and expensive.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Outcome
not used in the fielde0
Qualifier
labour-intensive and expensivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the method is not used in the field, because shading trees with nets is labour-intensive and expensive.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–526 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Different oily substances gave promising early results as alternatives to shading nets.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
different oily substancese0
Outcome
promising resultse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“First promising results were obtained with different oily substances.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–670 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–68 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf burn and fruit russeting remain possible negative side effects.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Outcome
leaf burn and fruit russetinge0
Qualifier
can not be excludede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“negative side effects such as leaf burn and fruit russeting, can not be excluded.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–793 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–68 · show in text ↑

shade · physiology: photosynthesis · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

trap barrier · physiology: photosynthesis · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.