Paper · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics

Reversing Agro-Based Land Degradation through Conservation Agriculture: Emerging Experiences from Zambia’s Smallholder Farming Sector

Bridget, Bwalya Umar

10
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This study reports on the land degradation minimizing effects of Conservation Agriculture (CA) as promoted among smallholder Zambian farmers. It found no evidence of CA associated improvements in soil fertility after five years of CA practice, most probably because crop residues were removed from the fields. The study reports high phosphorus (15.53 mg kg-1) and potassium (0.75 cmol kg-1) levels, low nitrogen (0.12 %) and organic carbon (1.19 %) levels, and no plough/hoe pans in soils from both CA and conventionally (CV) managed fields. This is in part contrary to the dominant land degradation narratives which have been the basis for promoting CA in the study areas. Faidherbia albida, a leguminous tree promoted as part of the CA package in Zambia, is associated with significantly higher levels of nitrogen, organic carbon and potassium under its canopy. Its planting by CA farmers is linked to the incentives provided by CA promoters. Average maize yields of 3.8 t ha-1 and 2.8 t ha-1 were reported under CA and CV systems respectively. Government subsidies for mineral fertilizer and hybrid seed promote maize mono-cropping and remain unsupportive of CA. It is concluded that the dominant land degradation narrative, which posits population induced land degradation, may not hold in this case. Instead, the removal of crop residues and low levels of mineral fertilizer and manure amendments may better explain the soil fertility status of the study areas. More nutrient replacement strategies are required if the benefits of CA on soil fertility are to be actualized in the immediate future.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After five years, Conservation Agriculture practice gave no evidence of improved soil fertility relative to conventionally managed fields.

Treatment
CA practicee1
Outcome
soil fertilitye1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1
Comparator
conventionally (CV) managed fieldse4

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e1

“It found no evidence of CA associated improvements in soil fertility after five years of CA practice, most probably because crop residues were removed from the fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 142–308 · show in text ↑
e4

“no plough/hoe pans in soils from both CA and conventionally (CV) managed fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–540 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil phosphorus is high at 15.53 mg kg-1.

Outcome
phosphoruse2
Direction
highe2
Value
15.53 mg kg-1e2

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e2

“The study reports high phosphorus (15.53 mg kg-1) and potassium (0.75 cmol kg-1) levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–397 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil potassium is high at 0.75 cmol kg-1.

Outcome
potassiume2
Direction
highe2
Value
0.75 cmol kg-1e2

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e2

“The study reports high phosphorus (15.53 mg kg-1) and potassium (0.75 cmol kg-1) levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–397 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil nitrogen is low at 0.12 %.

Outcome
nitrogene3
Direction
lowe3
Value
0.12 %e3

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e3

“low nitrogen (0.12 %) and organic carbon (1.19 %) levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–455 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil organic carbon is low at 1.19 %.

Outcome
organic carbone3
Direction
lowe3
Value
1.19 %e3

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e3

“low nitrogen (0.12 %) and organic carbon (1.19 %) levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–455 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No plough or hoe pans occur in soils of either CA or conventionally managed fields.

Outcome
plough/hoe panse4

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e4

“no plough/hoe pans in soils from both CA and conventionally (CV) managed fields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–540 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Faidherbia albida canopies have significantly higher nitrogen, organic carbon and potassium levels.

Taxon
Faidherbia albidaFaidherbia albidae5
Outcome
levels of nitrogen, organic carbon and potassiume5
Direction
highere5
Setting
under its canopye5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Faidherbia albida
Faidherbia albida · TaxonMarco Schmidt [1] · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Faidherbia albida, a leguminous tree promoted as part of the CA package in Zambia, is associated with significantly higher levels of nitrogen, organic carbon and potassium under its canopy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–862 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average maize yield was about 3.8 t ha-1 under Conservation Agriculture and 2.8 t ha-1 under conventional systems.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse6
Treatment
CAe6
Outcome
maize yieldse6
Direction
higherinferrede6
Value
3.8 t ha-1 and 2.8 t ha-1e6
Comparator
CV systemse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Average maize yields of 3.8 t ha-1 and 2.8 t ha-1 were reported under CA and CV systems respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1045 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Removal of crop residues and low mineral fertilizer and manure use may better explain soil fertility status than population-induced degradation.

Outcome
soil fertility statuse7
Qualifier
the removal of crop residues and low levels of mineral fertilizer and manure amendmentse7

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e7

“the removal of crop residues and low levels of mineral fertilizer and manure amendments may better explain the soil fertility status of the study areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1314–1465 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

More nutrient replacement strategies are required for Conservation Agriculture benefits on soil fertility.

Outcome
nutrient replacement strategiese1

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e1

“More nutrient replacement strategies are required if the benefits of CA on soil fertility are to be actualized in the immediate future”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1467–1601 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.