Paper · 2022 · UPM Digital Archive (Technical University of Madrid)

Nitrous oxide emissions and microbial communities during the transition to conservation agriculture using N-enhanced efficiency fertilisers in a semiarid climate

Montoya Novillo, Mónica; Juhanson, Jaanis; Hallin, Sara; et al.

15
claims
32
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The transition year from tillage to no tillage in semiarid areas and its effects on nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions and related microbial communities, as well as the potential interaction with N management, including enhanced-efficiency fertilisers, are not well studied despite their economic and environmental implications. In tilled and nontilled plots, the effectiveness of the double DMPSA + NBPT inhibitor (applied with urea at basal fertilisation) and that of DMPSA (applied with calcium ammonium nitrate at top-dressing) in the mitigation of N2O emissions were evaluated in a rainfed barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) crop in central Spain. Crop yield, nitrogen (N) uptake, the abundances of key genes involved in nitrification and denitrification processes and meteorological conditions and soil ancillary properties were monitored. In addition, the composition of bacterial communities was determined by sequencing the 16S rRNA gene. Fertilisers with inhibitors decreased cumulative N2O emissions and yield-scaled N2O emissions by 53% and 56%, respectively, with respect to those without inhibitors, which coincided with a trend of increasing grain and biomass yield and aboveground N uptake (by 11.3%, 9.2% and 7.2%, respectively). The highest N2O emissions were measured 49 days after harvest (immediately after a rainfall event that like reactivated soil microorganisms), reaching 15 mg N m−2 d−1 for the treatment with fertiliser without inhibitor combined with tillage. This peak was linked to a remarkable increase in the abundance of denitrifiers. The abundance of nitrifiers and denitrifiers successfully explained the N2O dynamics observed after basal fertilisation (i.e. an increase in the amoA/nosZ ratio in fertilised plots with inhibitors, where the highest emissions were observed). Our results also showed a reduction in the abundance of the phylum Nitrospirae throughout the cropping period in the plots that received inhibitors. No tillage led to a higher abundance of Cyanobacteria, Verrucomicrobia and Bacteroidetes and resulted in better implantation of the crop and higher plant density compared with tillage, thus increasing yields and N use efficiency and decreasing N2O emissions. Under the conditions of our study, shifting from conventional tillage to no tillage enhanced the balance between N use efficiency and yield-scaled N2O emissions in the first year of conversion, particularity with the use of the double inhibitor with urea at basal fertilisation and DMPSA with CAN at dressing.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizers with inhibitors reduced cumulative N2O emissions by 53%.

Taxon
barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)Hordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
Fertilisers with inhibitorse0
Outcome
cumulative N2O emissionse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
53%e0
Comparator
those without inhibitorse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilisers with inhibitors decreased cumulative N2O emissions and yield-scaled N2O emissions by 53% and 56%, respectively, with respect to those without inhibitors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1100 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–622 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizers with inhibitors reduced yield scaled N2O emissions by 56%.

Taxon
barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)Hordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
Fertilisers with inhibitorse0
Outcome
yield-scaled N2O emissionse0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
56%e0
Comparator
those without inhibitorse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fertilisers with inhibitors decreased cumulative N2O emissions and yield-scaled N2O emissions by 53% and 56%, respectively, with respect to those without inhibitors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1100 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–622 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inhibitor use coincided with an 11.3% upward trend in grain yield.

Taxon
barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)Hordeum vulgaret0
Outcome
graine0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
11.3%e0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a trend of increasing grain and biomass yield and aboveground N uptake (by 11.3%, 9.2% and 7.2%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1233 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–622 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inhibitor use coincided with a 9.2% upward trend in biomass yield.

Taxon
barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)Hordeum vulgaret0
Outcome
biomass yielde0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
9.2%e0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a trend of increasing grain and biomass yield and aboveground N uptake (by 11.3%, 9.2% and 7.2%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1233 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–622 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inhibitor use coincided with a 7.2% upward trend in aboveground nitrogen uptake.

Taxon
barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)Hordeum vulgaret0
Outcome
aboveground N uptakee0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
7.2%e0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a trend of increasing grain and biomass yield and aboveground N uptake (by 11.3%, 9.2% and 7.2%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1233 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–622 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The greatest N2O emission peak was 15 mg N m−2 d−1 after harvest following rainfall, with fertilization without inhibitor and tillage.

Taxon
barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)Hordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
fertiliser without inhibitor combined with tillagee0
Outcome
N2O emissionse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
15 mg N m−2 d−1e0
Qualifier
49 days after harveste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest N2O emissions were measured 49 days after harvest (immediately after a rainfall event that like reactivated soil microorganisms), reaching 15 mg N m−2 d−1 for the treatment with fertiliser without inhibitor combined with tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1475 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–622 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The emission peak was linked to increased denitrifier abundance.

Taxon
barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)Hordeum vulgaret0
Outcome
abundance of denitrifierse0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
This peake0
Setting
central Spaine1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This peak was linked to a remarkable increase in the abundance of denitrifiers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1477–1555 · show in text ↑
e1

“in central Spain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 623–639 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–622 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrifier and denitrifier abundances explained N2O dynamics after basal fertilization.

Taxon
barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)Hordeum vulgaret0
Outcome
N2O dynamicse0
Qualifier
abundance of nitrifiers and denitrifierse0
Setting
central Spaine1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The abundance of nitrifiers and denitrifiers successfully explained the N2O dynamics observed after basal fertilisation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1557–1676 · show in text ↑
e1

“in central Spain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 623–639 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–622 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The amoA to nosZ ratio increased in inhibitor fertilized plots where emissions were highest.

Taxon
barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)Hordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
fertilised plots with inhibitorse0
Outcome
amoA/nosZ ratioe0
Direction
increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an increase in the amoA/nosZ ratio in fertilised plots with inhibitors, where the highest emissions were observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1683–1796 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–622 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inhibitor plots showed reduced Nitrospirae abundance during cropping.

Taxon
barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)Hordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
inhibitorse0
Outcome
abundance of the phylum Nitrospiraee0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a reduction in the abundance of the phylum Nitrospirae throughout the cropping period in the plots that received inhibitors”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1823–1946 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–622 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No tillage increased Cyanobacteria, Verrucomicrobia and Bacteroidetes abundance.

Taxon
barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)Hordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
No tillagee0
Outcome
abundance of Cyanobacteria, Verrucomicrobia and Bacteroidetese0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No tillage led to a higher abundance of Cyanobacteria, Verrucomicrobia and Bacteroidetes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1948–2036 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–622 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No tillage improved crop establishment and increased plant density relative to tillage.

Taxon
barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)Hordeum vulgaret0
Treatment
No tillagee0
Outcome
implantation of the crop and higher plant densitye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No tillage led to a higher abundance of Cyanobacteria, Verrucomicrobia and Bacteroidetes and resulted in better implantation of the crop and higher plant density compared with tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1948–2131 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–622 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No tillage increased yield and nitrogen use efficiency.

Taxon
barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)Hordeum vulgaret0
Outcome
yields and N use efficiencye0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“thus increasing yields and N use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2133–2176 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–622 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No tillage decreased N2O emissions.

Taxon
barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)Hordeum vulgaret0
Outcome
N2O emissionse0
Direction
decreasinge0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decreasing N2O emissions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2181–2205 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–622 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conversion to no tillage improved the balance of nitrogen use efficiency and yield scaled emissions in the first year, especially with the specified inhibitor regime.

Taxon
barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)Hordeum vulgaret0
Outcome
balance between N use efficiency and yield-scaled N2O emissionse0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
first year of conversione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shifting from conventional tillage to no tillage enhanced the balance between N use efficiency and yield-scaled N2O emissions in the first year of conversion, particularity with the use of the double inhibitor with urea at basal fertilisation and DMPSA with CAN at dressing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2242–2515 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–622 · show in text ↑

fertilization · environment: emissions · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

fertilization · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 473 positive, 77 negative or no effect

472 papers in the same direction as this paper · 66 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.