Paper · 2025 · bonndoc (University of Bonn)

Rhizospheric Bacillus isolates control Fusarium wilt on cotton and enhance plant biomass and root development

Aslam, Seema; Baber, Muhammad; Naqqash, Tahir; et al.

17
claims
34
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Cotton is a globally significant crop, serving as a source of natural fiber for the textile industry and contributing to various other products. Its economic importance is substantial, impacting livelihoods and international trade. However, cotton production faces numerous challenges, including Fusarium wilt caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum (Fov), which can lead to significant yield and fiber quality losses. Plants alter their root exudate profiles in response to pathogens, often selectively enriching for beneficial rhizobacteria with antagonistic activity and plant growth-promoting traits. This study thus aims to characterize bacteria isolated from the rhizosphere of diseased cotton plants. The antifungal activity of 43 isolates was assessed against Fov in vitro. Eight of these inhibited Fov growth by 68.4 to 76.9%. 16S rRNA sequencing confirmed these isolates as Bacillus species. These eight Bacillus strains were further examined for their different modes of action in vitro, and their effect on cotton plants in greenhouse experiments challenged with Fov. All eight strains produced chitinases and pectinases, seven demonstrated cellulase and three protease activity, six produced urease, and five siderophores. Only B. subtilis SC11 exhibited phosphate solubilization activity. Seed treatments revealed that B. subtilis SC10 and B. subtilis SC11 were the standout treatments reducing Fov-caused symptoms by ~83% compared to Fov-inoculated control plants and most significantly improved plant growth and antioxidant activity. In detail, B. subtilis SC11 increased shoot and root dry weight by 160 and 250%, respectively. B. subtilis SC10 increased peroxidase activity by ~143% and ascorbate peroxidase activity by ~60%, while in B. subtilis SC11 treated plants superoxide dismutase activity increased by ~100%. Bacillus treatments effectively mitigated lipid peroxidation, achieving up to 91.4% reduction (B. subtilis SC10, B. halotolerans SC15), and decreased H2O2 accumulation by up to 58.4% (B. halotolerans SC32) compared to the Fov control. Principle component analysis revealed that regarding plant growth parameters, the treatments, and controls were distributed differentially across PC1 and PC2, with 60.30 and 15.62% data variance, respectively, showing the effectiveness of Bacillus isolates in greenhouse experiments. The findings of this study will contribute to the development of sustainable biocontrol strategies for managing Fusarium wilt in cotton.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eight isolates inhibited Fov growth by 68.4 to 76.9% in vitro.

Interactor
Fove0pathogen
Outcome
Fov growthe0
Direction
inhibitede0
Value
68.4 to 76.9%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Eight of these inhibited Fov growth by 68.4 to 76.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–842 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–62 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The eight inhibitory isolates were identified as Bacillus species.

Interactor
Bacillus speciese0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
confirmed these isolates as Bacillus speciese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“16S rRNA sequencing confirmed these isolates as Bacillus species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–908 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–62 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All eight Bacillus strains produced chitinases and pectinases.

Gene
chitinases and pectinasese0
Outcome
produced chitinases and pectinasese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All eight strains produced chitinases and pectinases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1140 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–62 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seven strains had cellulase activity, three had protease activity, six produced urease, and five produced siderophores.

Outcome
cellulase and three protease activity, six produced urease, and five siderophorese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seven demonstrated cellulase and three protease activity, six produced urease, and five siderophores”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1242 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–62 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only B. subtilis SC11 showed phosphate solubilization activity.

Interactor
B. subtilis SC11Bacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
phosphate solubilization activitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · InteractorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Only B. subtilis SC11 exhibited phosphate solubilization activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1309 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. subtilis SC10 seed treatment reduced Fov-caused symptoms by approximately 83% against Fov-inoculated controls.

Treatment
B. subtilis SC10e0
Interactor
Fove0pathogen
Second interactor
B. subtilis SC10Bacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Fov-caused symptomse0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
~83%e0
Comparator
Fov-inoculated control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · Second interactorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. subtilis SC10 and B. subtilis SC11 were the standout treatments reducing Fov-caused symptoms by ~83% compared to Fov-inoculated control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1486 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. subtilis SC11 seed treatment reduced Fov-caused symptoms by approximately 83% against Fov-inoculated controls.

Treatment
B. subtilis SC11e0
Interactor
Fove0pathogen
Second interactor
B. subtilis SC11Bacillus subtilise0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Fov-caused symptomse0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
~83%e0
Comparator
Fov-inoculated control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus subtilis
Bacillus subtilis · Second interactorY tambe (original uploader) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. subtilis SC10 and B. subtilis SC11 were the standout treatments reducing Fov-caused symptoms by ~83% compared to Fov-inoculated control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1486 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

B. subtilis SC10 and SC11 improved plant growth and antioxidant activity most significantly.

Treatment
B. subtilis SC10 and B. subtilis SC11e0
Outcome
plant growth and antioxidant activitye0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. subtilis SC10 and B. subtilis SC11 were the standout treatments reducing Fov-caused symptoms by ~83% compared to Fov-inoculated control plants and most significantly improved plant growth and antioxidant activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1556 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. subtilis SC11 increased shoot dry weight by 160%.

Treatment
B. subtilis SC11e0
Outcome
shoot and root dry weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
160e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. subtilis SC11 increased shoot and root dry weight by 160 and 250%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1569–1651 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. subtilis SC11 increased root dry weight by 250%.

Treatment
B. subtilis SC11e0
Outcome
root dry weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
250%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. subtilis SC11 increased shoot and root dry weight by 160 and 250%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1569–1651 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. subtilis SC10 increased peroxidase activity by approximately 143%.

Treatment
B. subtilis SC10e0
Gene
peroxidasee0
Outcome
peroxidase activitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
~143%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. subtilis SC10 increased peroxidase activity by ~143% and ascorbate peroxidase activity by ~60%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1653–1750 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. subtilis SC10 increased ascorbate peroxidase activity by approximately 60%.

Treatment
B. subtilis SC10e0
Gene
ascorbate peroxidasee0
Outcome
ascorbate peroxidase activitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
~60%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“B. subtilis SC10 increased peroxidase activity by ~143% and ascorbate peroxidase activity by ~60%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1653–1750 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. subtilis SC11 increased superoxide dismutase activity by approximately 100%.

Treatment
B. subtilis SC11e0
Gene
superoxide dismutasee0
Outcome
superoxide dismutase activitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
~100%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in B. subtilis SC11 treated plants superoxide dismutase activity increased by ~100%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1758–1841 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. subtilis SC10 reduced lipid peroxidation by up to 91.4%.

Treatment
B. subtilis SC10e0
Outcome
lipid peroxidatione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
91.4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bacillus treatments effectively mitigated lipid peroxidation, achieving up to 91.4% reduction (B. subtilis SC10, B. halotolerans SC15)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1843–1977 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. halotolerans SC15 reduced lipid peroxidation by up to 91.4%.

Treatment
B. halotolerans SC15e0
Outcome
lipid peroxidatione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
91.4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Bacillus treatments effectively mitigated lipid peroxidation, achieving up to 91.4% reduction (B. subtilis SC10, B. halotolerans SC15)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1843–1977 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

B. halotolerans SC32 reduced H2O2 accumulation by up to 58.4% against Fov controls.

Treatment
B. halotolerans SC32e0
Outcome
H2O2 accumulatione0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
58.4%e0
Comparator
Fov controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decreased H2O2 accumulation by up to 58.4% (B. halotolerans SC32) compared to the Fov control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1983–2076 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–62 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Principal component analysis separated treatments and controls for plant growth parameters across PC1 and PC2, accounting for 60.30% and 15.62% variance.

Outcome
plant growth parameterse0
Direction
distributed differentiallye0
Value
60.30 and 15.62%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“regarding plant growth parameters, the treatments, and controls were distributed differentially across PC1 and PC2, with 60.30 and 15.62% data variance, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2121–2286 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–62 · show in text ↑

Bacillus subtilis · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Bacillus halotolerans · physiology: oxidative · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Bacillus subtilis · quality: phytochemicals · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Bacillus subtilis · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Bacillus subtilis · physiology: oxidative · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Bacillus subtilis · disease · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.