Paper · 2019 · International Journal of Biosciences (IJB)

Morpho-agronomical and physiological response of cotton seedlings to low nitrogen supply

Asif Iqbal; Wang Zhun; Dong Qiang; et al.

9
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Among the crop production factors, nitrogen is the most important limiting factor of crop production. The relationship between photosynthesis and nitrogen nutrition has been widely studied in different crops. However, in cotton leaf photosynthetic traits and nitrogen use efficiency are less clear at the seedling stage. It was found that low nitrogen supply significantly reduced cotton growth, photosynthesis, nitrogen content and ultimately the nitrogen use efficiency except root morphological traits. Correspondingly, all the parameters related to gaseous exchange were very sensitive to nitrogen deficiency and therefore reduced. However, the intercellular CO2 concentration and nitrogen efficiency ratio were increased under low N supply. These results suggest the possibility of utilizing these traits as indicators for optimum nitrogen fertilization and development of nitrogen efficient genotypes. Further, this could lead to the development of sustainable agriculture for better crop productivity and profitability as well as environmental protection.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Low nitrogen significantly reduced cotton growth.

Treatment
low nitrogen supplye0
Outcome
cotton growthe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“low nitrogen supply significantly reduced cotton growth, photosynthesis, nitrogen content and ultimately the nitrogen use efficiency except root morphological traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 339–504 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Low nitrogen significantly reduced cotton photosynthesis.

Treatment
low nitrogen supplye0
Outcome
photosynthesise0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“low nitrogen supply significantly reduced cotton growth, photosynthesis, nitrogen content and ultimately the nitrogen use efficiency except root morphological traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 339–504 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Low nitrogen significantly reduced cotton nitrogen content.

Treatment
low nitrogen supplye0
Outcome
nitrogen contente0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“low nitrogen supply significantly reduced cotton growth, photosynthesis, nitrogen content and ultimately the nitrogen use efficiency except root morphological traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 339–504 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Low nitrogen significantly reduced cotton nitrogen use efficiency.

Treatment
low nitrogen supplye0
Outcome
nitrogen use efficiencye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“low nitrogen supply significantly reduced cotton growth, photosynthesis, nitrogen content and ultimately the nitrogen use efficiency except root morphological traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 339–504 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root morphological traits were an exception to the reported low nitrogen reductions.

Treatment
low nitrogen supplye0t0
Outcome
root morphological traitse0t0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“low nitrogen supply significantly reduced cotton growth, photosynthesis, nitrogen content and ultimately the nitrogen use efficiency except root morphological traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 339–504 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gas exchange parameters were reduced under nitrogen deficiency.

Treatment
nitrogen deficiencye0t0
Outcome
parameters related to gaseous exchangee0t0
Direction
reducede0t0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all the parameters related to gaseous exchange were very sensitive to nitrogen deficiency and therefore reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–634 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercellular CO2 concentration increased under low nitrogen.

Treatment
low N supplye0t0
Outcome
intercellular CO2 concentratione0t0
Direction
increasede0t0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the intercellular CO2 concentration and nitrogen efficiency ratio were increased under low N supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–744 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen efficiency ratio increased under low nitrogen.

Treatment
low N supplye0t0
Outcome
nitrogen efficiency ratioe0t0
Direction
increasede0t0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the intercellular CO2 concentration and nitrogen efficiency ratio were increased under low N supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–744 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–55 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest these traits as indicators for optimum nitrogen fertilization and development of nitrogen efficient genotypes.

Outcome
indicators for optimum nitrogen fertilization and development of nitrogen efficient genotypese0t0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“utilizing these traits as indicators for optimum nitrogen fertilization and development of nitrogen efficient genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–906 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–55 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · physiology: photosynthesis · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 22 positive, 9 negative or no effect

21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 27 positive, 9 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

79 papers: 71 positive, 8 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
    Nitrate at 9 meq/liter was less effective for N accumulation relative to vegetative parts.

    Growth of Cotton Plants on Nitrate and Ammonium Nitrogen1 · 1975 · compared with lower concentrations of either source, or their combination

    Opposite direction

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

153 papers: 129 positive, 24 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

149 papers more in this group

See all 153 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.