Paper · 2016 · Journal of Biological Chemistry and Environmental Sciences

EFFECT OF ROW SPACING, SEED RATE AND NITROGEN FFERTILIZATION ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF SUUGARCANE

10
claims
21
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The present work was conducted at Shandaweel Agricultural Research Station, Sohag Governorate (26.5013° N, 31.7651° E)during 2013/2014 and 2014/2015 seasons to investigate the effect of three row spacing (80, 90 and 100 cm), two seed rates (37800 and 50400 buds/fed) and three nitrogen levels (180, 200 and 220 kg N/fed) on yield and quality of sugarcane. Each experiment was carried out in a randomized complete block design using a split-split plot arrangement with three replications.The results showed that planting sugarcane in rows spaced at 90 cm apart attained a significant increase in cane stalk height, number of millable canes, cane yield/fed, as well as brix, sucrose, sugar recovery percentages and sugar yield/fed compared with those planted at 80 and 100 cm. Significant increase in stalk diameter was recorded at 100 cm row spacing in both seasons.The results indicated that the two seed rates differed significantly in cane stalk height, stalk diameter, number of millable canes, cane and sugar yields, as well as brix, sucrose percentages in both seasons.Raising N fertilization level from 180 to 220 kg N/fed resulted in a significant increase in cane stalk height, stalk diameter, number of millable canes, cane and sugar yields /fed in both seasons0Under conditions of the present work, growing promising sugarcane variety G. 2003-47 in rows of 90 cm apart and fertilized with 220 kg N/fed can be recommended to get the maximum cane and sugar yields/fed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane planted in rows 90 cm apart had a significant increase in cane stalk height, number of millable canes and cane yield per fed.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
rows spaced at 90 cm aparte2
Outcome
cane stalk height, number of millable canes, cane yield/fede2
Direction
significant increasee2
Comparator
those planted at 80 and 100 cme2
Setting
Shandaweel Agricultural Research Station, Sohag Governoratee0

Verbatim

e0

“conducted at Shandaweel Agricultural Research Station, Sohag Governorate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 21–93 · show in text ↑
e1

“on yield and quality of sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 321–354 · show in text ↑
e2

“planting sugarcane in rows spaced at 90 cm apart attained a significant increase in cane stalk height, number of millable canes, cane yield/fed, as well as brix, sucrose, sugar recovery percentages and sugar yield/fed compared with those planted at 80 and 100 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–773 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane planted in rows 90 cm apart had a significant increase in brix, sucrose and sugar recovery percentages.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
rows spaced at 90 cm aparte2
Outcome
brix, sucrose, sugar recovery percentagese2
Direction
significant increasee2
Comparator
those planted at 80 and 100 cme2

Verbatim

e1

“on yield and quality of sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 321–354 · show in text ↑
e2

“planting sugarcane in rows spaced at 90 cm apart attained a significant increase in cane stalk height, number of millable canes, cane yield/fed, as well as brix, sucrose, sugar recovery percentages and sugar yield/fed compared with those planted at 80 and 100 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–773 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane planted in rows 90 cm apart had a significant increase in sugar yield per fed.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
rows spaced at 90 cm aparte2
Outcome
sugar yield/fede2
Direction
significant increasee2
Comparator
those planted at 80 and 100 cme2

Verbatim

e1

“on yield and quality of sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 321–354 · show in text ↑
e2

“planting sugarcane in rows spaced at 90 cm apart attained a significant increase in cane stalk height, number of millable canes, cane yield/fed, as well as brix, sucrose, sugar recovery percentages and sugar yield/fed compared with those planted at 80 and 100 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–773 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane stalk diameter had a significant increase at 100 cm row spacing.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
100 cm row spacinge4
Outcome
stalk diametere4
Direction
Significant increasee4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“on yield and quality of sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 321–354 · show in text ↑
e4

“Significant increase in stalk diameter was recorded at 100 cm row spacing in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–864 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The two seed rates differed significantly in cane stalk height, stalk diameter and number of millable canes.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
the two seed ratese5
Outcome
cane stalk height, stalk diameter, number of millable canese5
Direction
differed significantlye5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“on yield and quality of sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 321–354 · show in text ↑
e5

“the two seed rates differed significantly in cane stalk height, stalk diameter, number of millable canes, cane and sugar yields, as well as brix, sucrose percentages in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1073 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The two seed rates differed significantly in cane and sugar yields.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
the two seed ratese5
Outcome
cane and sugar yieldse5
Direction
differed significantlye5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“on yield and quality of sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 321–354 · show in text ↑
e5

“the two seed rates differed significantly in cane stalk height, stalk diameter, number of millable canes, cane and sugar yields, as well as brix, sucrose percentages in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1073 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The two seed rates differed significantly in brix and sucrose percentages.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
the two seed ratese5
Outcome
brix, sucrose percentagese5
Direction
differed significantlye5

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“on yield and quality of sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 321–354 · show in text ↑
e5

“the two seed rates differed significantly in cane stalk height, stalk diameter, number of millable canes, cane and sugar yields, as well as brix, sucrose percentages in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1073 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Raising N from 180 to 220 kg N/fed significantly increased cane stalk height, stalk diameter and number of millable canes.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
Raising N fertilization level from 180 to 220 kg N/fede6
Outcome
cane stalk height, stalk diameter, number of millable canese6
Direction
significant increasee6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“on yield and quality of sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 321–354 · show in text ↑
e6

“Raising N fertilization level from 180 to 220 kg N/fed resulted in a significant increase in cane stalk height, stalk diameter, number of millable canes, cane and sugar yields /fed in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1270 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Raising N from 180 to 220 kg N/fed significantly increased cane and sugar yields per fed.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
Raising N fertilization level from 180 to 220 kg N/fede6
Outcome
cane and sugar yields /fede6
Direction
significant increasee6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“on yield and quality of sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 321–354 · show in text ↑
e6

“Raising N fertilization level from 180 to 220 kg N/fed resulted in a significant increase in cane stalk height, stalk diameter, number of millable canes, cane and sugar yields /fed in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1074–1270 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane variety G. 2003-47 in rows 90 cm apart fertilized with 220 kg N/fed is recommended for maximum cane and sugar yields.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Material
G. 2003-47e7
Treatment
rows of 90 cm apart and fertilized with 220 kg N/fede7
Outcome
cane and sugar yields/fede7

Verbatim

e1

“on yield and quality of sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 321–354 · show in text ↑
e7

“growing promising sugarcane variety G. 2003-47 in rows of 90 cm apart and fertilized with 220 kg N/fed can be recommended to get the maximum cane and sugar yields/fed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1309–1475 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

47 papers: 40 positive, 7 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

137 papers: 118 positive, 19 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

133 papers more in this group

See all 137 papers →

density · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 15 positive, 3 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

fertilization · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

147 papers: 129 positive, 18 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

143 papers more in this group

See all 147 papers →

fertilization · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

346 papers: 312 positive, 34 negative or no effect

311 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

342 papers more in this group

See all 346 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.