Paper · 2026 · Plants

Physiological and Morphological Response Mechanisms of Theobroma cacao L. Rootstocks Under Flooding and Evaluation of Their Adaptability

Maria Luiza Pereira Barbosa Pinto; Vinicius de Souza Oliveira; Jeane Crasque; et al.

1
claims
2
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The response of cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) to low oxygen availability in the soil and the possibility of recovery after stress relief are associated with the plasticity capacity of each genotype; however, studies evaluating the influence of rootstock on stress response are scarce. Thus, in the northern region of the state of Espírito Santo, municipality of São Mateus, the physiological, biochemical, and anatomical responses and recovery capacity of cocoa PS-1319 grafted onto the rootstocks TSH-1188, Cepec-2002, Pará, Esfip-02, and SJ-02 were evaluated under flooded conditions. The plants were subjected to flooding for 60 days, and their recovery capacity was assessed after this period. The gas exchange, relative chlorophyll content, stem and leaf anatomy, photosynthetic pigments, and carbohydrates were evaluated. All genotypes showed reductions in net photosynthetic assimilation, stomatal conductance, and transpiration rate in the flooded environment compared to the non-flooded environment. All pigments were degraded, with average values of Chl a, Chl b, total Chl, and total carotenoids of 9.33, 10.418, 19.75, and 590.75 μg.mL−1 in the non-flooded environment and 6.43, 7.69, 14.12, and 500.33 μg.mL−1 in the flooded environment. The rootstocks Cepec-2002 and Esfip-02 showed the highest carotenoid accumulation, with 585.78 and 650.47 μg.mL−1, respectively, when compared to SJ-02 (474.03 μg.mL−1), Pará (491.58 μg.mL−1), and TSH-1188 (525.86 491.58 μg.mL−1). The Pará rootstock did not show differences in stomatal density between environments, with values of 32.25 in flooding, 34.83 in non-flooding, and 31.61 in recovery. During flooding, lenticels formed in all rootstocks. After recovery, all rootstocks normalized their gas exchange, carbohydrate levels, and anatomy, showing that the root system was able to re-establish its functions, making these rootstocks suitable for areas at risk of flooding.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 1

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All cocoa genotypes had reduced net photosynthetic assimilation under flooding.

Taxon
Theobroma cacao L.Theobroma cacaot0
Treatment
flooded environmente0
Outcome
net photosynthetic assimilatione0
Direction
reductionse0
Comparator
non-flooded environmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All genotypes showed reductions in net photosynthetic assimilation, stomatal conductance, and transpiration rate in the flooded environment compared to the non-flooded environment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–1005 · show in text ↑
t0

“Theobroma cacao L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–73 · show in text ↑

flooding · physiology: photosynthesis · Theobroma cacao (cocoa)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.